Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Liana Mikaelyan

dblp:235/0491 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2788-3777ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 41% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 41% Information extraction and text analysis · 18%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
knowledge-augmented language models
0.912025
KBLaM: Knowledge Base augmented Language Model · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base enrichment
0.912025
KBLaM: Knowledge Base augmented Language Model · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering › knowledge integration
knowledge base integration
0.912025
KBLaM: Knowledge Base augmented Language Model · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
KBLaM: Knowledge Base augmented Language Model · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sentence encoder · 0.9attention mechanism · 0.9multistage extraction · 0.8language model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 KBLaM: Knowledge Base augmented Language Model
abstract
In this paper, we propose Knowledge Base augmented Language Model (KBLAM), a new method for augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge. KBLAM works with a knowledge base (KB) constructed from a corpus of documents, transforming each piece of knowledge in the KB into continuous key-value vector pairs via pre-trained sentence encoders with linear adapters and integrating them into pre-trained LLMs via a specialized rectangular attention mechanism. Unlike Retrieval-Augmented Generation, KBLAM eliminates external retrieval modules, and unlike in-context learning, its computational overhead scales linearly with KB size rather than quadratically. Our approach enables integrating a large KB of more than 10K triples into an 8B pre-trained LLM of only 8K context window on one single A100 80GB GPU and allows for dynamic updates without model fine-tuning or retraining. Experiments demonstrate KBLAM’s effectiveness in various tasks, including question-answering and open-ended reasoning, while providing interpretable insights into its use of the augmented knowledge. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/microsoft/KBLaM/
Taketomo Isazawa, Liana Mikaelyan, James Hensman
ICLR3
2024 Learning to Extract Structured Entities Using Language Models
abstract
Recent advances in machine learning have significantly impacted the field of information extraction, with Language Models (LMs) playing a pivotal role in extracting structured information from unstructured text.Prior works typically represent information extraction as triplet-centric and use classical metrics such as precision and recall for evaluation.We reformulate the task to be entity-centric, enabling the use of diverse metrics that can provide more insights from various perspectives.We contribute to the field by introducing Structured Entity Extraction and proposing the Approximate Entity Set OverlaP (AESOP) metric, designed to appropriately assess model performance.Later, we introduce a new Multistage Structured Entity Extraction (MuSEE) model that harnesses the power of LMs for enhanced effectiveness and efficiency by decomposing the extraction task into multiple stages.Quantitative and human side-by-side evaluations confirm that our model outperforms baselines, offering promising directions for future advancements in structured entity extraction.Our source code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/Structured- Entity-Extraction.
Haolun Wu, Ye Yuan 0017, Liana Mikaelyan, Alexander Meulemans, Xue Liu 0004, James Hensman, Bhaskar Mitra 0001
EMNLP3
2020 Synthesizing and optimizing FDIR recovery strategies from fault trees
abstract
Redundancy concepts are major design drivers in fault-tolerant space systems. It can be a difficult task to decide when to activate which redundancy, and which component should be replaced. In this paper, we refine a methodology where recovery strategies are synthesized from a model of non-deterministic dynamic fault trees. The synthesis is performed by transforming non-deterministic dynamic fault trees into Markov automata that represent all possible choices between recovery actions. From the corresponding scheduler, optimized for maximum expected long-term reachability of failure states, a recovery strategy, optimal with respect to mean time to failure, can then be derived and represented by a model we call recovery automaton. We discuss techniques for reducing the state space of this recovery automaton, and analyze their soundness and completeness. We show that they do not generally guarantee recovery automata with the minimal number of states and derive a class where this guarantee holds. Implementation details for our approach are given and its effectiveness is verified on the basis of three case studies.
Sascha Müller 0005, Liana Mikaelyan, Andreas Gerndt, Thomas Noll 0001
Sci. Comput. Program.2