Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Melisa A. Martinez-Paniagua

dblp:236/1386 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis
microscopy image analysis
1.022023
Automated detection of apoptotic bodies and cells in label-free time-lapse high-throughput video microscopy using deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2023
TIMING 2.0: high-throughput single-cell profiling of dynamic cell-cell interactions by time-lapse imaging microscopy in nanowell grids · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell segmentation
0.412019
TIMING 2.0: high-throughput single-cell profiling of dynamic cell-cell interactions by time-lapse imaging microscopy in nanowell grids · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis
0.412019
TIMING 2.0: high-throughput single-cell profiling of dynamic cell-cell interactions by time-lapse imaging microscopy in nanowell grids · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

resnet50 · 0.7image segmentation · 0.7convolutional neural network · 0.7time-lapse imaging · 0.4graphical processing unit · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Automated detection of apoptotic bodies and cells in label-free time-lapse high-throughput video microscopy using deep convolutional neural networks
abstract
MOTIVATION: Reliable label-free methods are needed for detecting and profiling apoptotic events in time-lapse cell-cell interaction assays. Prior studies relied on fluorescent markers of apoptosis, e.g. Annexin-V, that provide an inconsistent and late indication of apoptotic onset for human melanoma cells. Our motivation is to improve the detection of apoptosis by directly detecting apoptotic bodies in a label-free manner. RESULTS: Our trained ResNet50 network identified nanowells containing apoptotic bodies with 92% accuracy and predicted the onset of apoptosis with an error of one frame (5 min/frame). Our apoptotic body segmentation yielded an IoU accuracy of 75%, allowing associative identification of apoptotic cells. Our method detected apoptosis events, 70% of which were not detected by Annexin-V staining. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Open-source code and sample data provided at https://github.com/kwu14victor/ApoBDproject.
Kwan-Ling Wu, Melisa A. Martinez-Paniagua, Kate Reichel, Prashant Menon, Shravani Deo, Badrinath Roysam, Navin Varadarajan
Bioinform.2
2019 TIMING 2.0: high-throughput single-cell profiling of dynamic cell-cell interactions by time-lapse imaging microscopy in nanowell grids
abstract
MOTIVATION: Automated profiling of cell-cell interactions from high-throughput time-lapse imaging microscopy data of cells in nanowell grids (TIMING) has led to fundamental insights into cell-cell interactions in immunotherapy. This application note aims to enable widespread adoption of TIMING by (i) enabling the computations to occur on a desktop computer with a graphical processing unit instead of a server; (ii) enabling image acquisition and analysis to occur in the laboratory avoiding network data transfers to/from a server and (iii) providing a comprehensive graphical user interface. RESULTS: On a desktop computer, TIMING 2.0 takes 5 s/block/image frame, four times faster than our previous method on the same computer, and twice as fast as our previous method (TIMING) running on a Dell PowerEdge server. The cell segmentation accuracy (f-number = 0.993) is superior to our previous method (f-number = 0.821). A graphical user interface provides the ability to inspect the video analysis results, make corrective edits efficiently (one-click editing of an entire nanowell video sequence in 5-10 s) and display a summary of the cell killing efficacy measurements. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Open source Python software (GPL v3 license), instruction manual, sample data and sample results are included with the Supplement (https://github.com/RoysamLab/TIMING2). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hengyang Lu, Jiabing Li, Melisa A. Martinez-Paniagua, Irfan N. Bandey, Amit Amritkar, Harjeet Singh, David Mayerich, Navin Varadarajan, Badrinath Roysam
Bioinform.3