Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Takuo Kaneko

dblp:236/4441 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 70% Learning paradigms · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
complementary label learning
0.412020
Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
estimation error bounds
0.412020
Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › risk estimation
unbiased risk estimator
0.412020
Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification
0.112020
Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wrapper decomposition · 0.4unbiased risk estimator · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels
abstract
A complementary label (CL) simply indicates an incorrect class of an example, but learning with CLs results in multi-class classifiers that can predict the correct class. Unfortunately, the problem setting only allows a single CL for each example, which notably limits its potential since our labelers may easily identify multiple CLs (MCLs) to one example. In this paper, we propose a novel problem setting to allow MCLs for each example and two ways for learning with MCLs. In the first way, we design two wrappers that decompose MCLs into many single CLs, so that we could use any method for learning with CLs. However, the supervision information that MCLs hold is conceptually diluted after decomposition. Thus, in the second way, we derive an unbiased risk estimator; minimizing it processes each set of MCLs as a whole and possesses an estimation error bound. We further improve the second way into minimizing properly chosen upper bounds. Experiments show that the former way works well for learning with MCLs but the latter is even better.
Lei Feng 0006, Takuo Kaneko, Bo Han 0003, Gang Niu 0001, Bo An 0001, Masashi Sugiyama
ICML2