Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Takuo Kaneko
dblp:236/4441
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 70% Learning paradigms · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
complementary label learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
estimation error bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › risk estimation
unbiased risk estimator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Learning with Multiple Complementary Labels · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wrapper decomposition · 0.4unbiased risk estimator · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Learning with Multiple Complementary LabelsabstractA complementary label (CL) simply indicates an incorrect class of an example, but learning with CLs results in multi-class classifiers that can predict the correct class. Unfortunately, the problem setting only allows a single CL for each example, which notably limits its potential since our labelers may easily identify multiple CLs (MCLs) to one example. In this paper, we propose a novel problem setting to allow MCLs for each example and two ways for learning with MCLs. In the first way, we design two wrappers that decompose MCLs into many single CLs, so that we could use any method for learning with CLs. However, the supervision information that MCLs hold is conceptually diluted after decomposition. Thus, in the second way, we derive an unbiased risk estimator; minimizing it processes each set of MCLs as a whole and possesses an estimation error bound. We further improve the second way into minimizing properly chosen upper bounds. Experiments show that the former way works well for learning with MCLs but the latter is even better. Lei Feng 0006, Takuo Kaneko, Bo Han 0003, Gang Niu 0001, Bo An 0001, Masashi Sugiyama |
ICML | 2 |