Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siddhartha Nalluri
dblp:236/4988
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › temporal planning
temporal logic planning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hyperproperties for Robotics: Planning via HyperLTL · ICRA 2020 |
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
HyperLTL |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Hyperproperties for Robotics: Planning via HyperLTL · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic synthesis · 0.9linear temporal logic · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Statistical Model Checking for HyperpropertiesabstractHyperproperties have shown to be a powerful tool for expressing and reasoning about information-flow security policies. In this paper, we investigate the problem of statistical model checking (SMC) for hyperproperties. Unlike exhaustive model checking, SMC works based on drawing samples from the system at hand and evaluate the specification with statistical confidence. The main benefit of applying SMC over exhaustive techniques is its efficiency and scalability. To reason about probabilistic hyperproperties, we first propose the temporal logic HyperPCTL* that extends PCTL* and HyperPCTL. We show that HyperPCTL* can express important probabilistic information-flow security policies that cannot be expressed with HyperPCTL. Then, we introduce SMC algorithms for verifying HyperPCTL* formulas on discrete-time Markov chains, based on sequential probability ratio tests (SPRT) with a new notion of multidimensional indifference region. Our SMC algorithms can handle both non-nested and nested probability operators for any desired significance level. To show the effectiveness of our technique, we evaluate our SMC algorithms on four case studies focused on information security: timing side-channel vulnerability in encryption, probabilistic anonymity in dining cryptographers, probabilistic noninterference of parallel programs, and the performance of a randomized cache replacement policy that acts as a countermeasure against cache flush attacks. Yu Wang 0044, Siddhartha Nalluri, Borzoo Bonakdarpour, Miroslav Pajic |
CSF | 2 |
| 2020 | Hyperproperties for Robotics: Planning via HyperLTLabstractThere is a growing interest on formal methods-based robotic planning for temporal logic objectives. In this work, we extend the scope of existing synthesis methods to hyper-temporal logics. We are motivated by the fact that important planning objectives, such as optimality, robustness, and privacy, (maybe implicitly) involve the interrelation between multiple paths. Such objectives are thus hyperproperties, and cannot be expressed with usual temporal logics like the linear temporal logic (LTL). We show that such hyperproperties can be expressed by HyperLTL, an extension of LTL to multiple paths. To handle the complexity of planning with HyperLTL specifications, we introduce a symbolic approach for synthesizing planning strategies on discrete transition systems. Our planning method is evaluated on several case studies. Yu Wang 0044, Siddhartha Nalluri, Miroslav Pajic |
ICRA | 2 |