Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tiera Tanksley
dblp:236/5322
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6595-0440ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 77% Accessibility and assistive technology · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction › responsible AI
responsible AI design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | "Ethics is not neutral": Understanding Ethical and Responsible AI Design from the Lenses of Black Youth · CHI 2025 |
Accessibility and assistive technology
inclusive design |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | "Ethics is not neutral": Understanding Ethical and Responsible AI Design from the Lenses of Black Youth · CHI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative study · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | "Ethics is not neutral": Understanding Ethical and Responsible AI Design from the Lenses of Black Youth
Tiera Tanksley, Angela D. R. Smith, Saloni Sharma, Earl W. Huff Jr. |
CHI | 1 |
| 2020 | Minoritized Students' Engagement, Identity, and Agency in Computer Science: Listening to the Students ThemselvesabstractThis panel focuses on the voices of computer science (CS) high school students who come from communities historically underrepresented in CS. Our UCLA team worked in research-practice partnership with teachers and students from the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) to understand how youth engagement, agency, and identity are being impacted, if at all, by efforts to broaden participation in computing. Going beyond a "numbers" approach, we define equity as attending to the cultural wealth, funds of knowledge, and perspectives youth bring to their CS learning experiences, amplifying minoritized youth's visions of what CS education should be in the CS for All movement. This panel begins by sharing findings from our year-long qualitative study in four CS classrooms, followed by hearing from the students themselves about what impacts their motivation to learn CS. Student panelists will explain how and why they choose to engage in CS learning toward empowering themselves and their communities, as well as how they are developing CS identities. Together, we will explore what it takes for youth to acquire a sense of "rightful presence" [1] in a field dominated by people who do not look like them or come from their communities. Jean J. Ryoo, Jane Margolis, Tiera Tanksley, Cynthia Estrada, Alicia Morris |
SIGCSE | 3 |
| 2019 | Going Beyond the Platitudes of Equity: Developing a Shared Vision for Equity in Computer Science EducationabstractEfforts to broaden participation in computing address how systemic school structures, educator preparation, and curriculum can provide inclusive learning spaces for all students. The emerging multiplicity of scholarship in computer science (CS) education forwards diverse voices, perspectives, and positionalities, and together, provide a rich set of evidence-based narratives that can transform K-12 policies and practices. The four projects featured in this panel bring together CS education efforts with varying methodologies focused on equity-oriented pedagogies and learning for all youth across the US. This panel will focus not only on sharing the multi-pronged efforts of the featured projects, but also on developing a shared vision among participants and panelists for what equity" can and should be in the future of both SIGCSE and CS education as we celebrate SIGCSE's 50th anniversary. By highlighting the work of projects rather than individuals in this panel, audience members will have the opportunity to learn about how collaborative efforts create and examine contexts for equity in CS education across diverse stakeholders, while also providing a richer base for constructing visions of equity that go beyond mere platitudes, toward action items for broadening participation in computing. Jean J. Ryoo, Gail Chapman, Julie Flapan, Joanna Goode, Jane Margolis, Christine Ong, Cynthia Estrada, Makseem Skorodinsky, Tiera Tanksley, Jamika D. Burge, Ryoko Yamaguchi, Frieda McAlear, Allison Scott, Alexis Martin, Sonia Koshy, Kamau Bobb, Lien Diaz |
SIGCSE | 9 |