Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jing Nathan Yan

dblp:236/5688 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3886-8687ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
3D vision · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Language models and text generation · 24%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 40% Recommender systems · 29% Spatial and temporal data management · 17%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Visual content generation and editing · 70% Visualization and visual analytics · 30%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 77% Usability and user experience research · 23%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.932026
Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems · CHI 2026
Understanding User Sensemaking in Machine Learning Fairness Assessment Systems · WWW 2021
Silva: Interactively Assessing Machine Learning Fairness Using Causality · CHI 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.022025
Diffusion Models Without Attention · CVPR 2024
EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation · ICLR 2025
Recommender systems
fairness-aware recommendation
1.012026
Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems · CHI 2026
Computer vision › 3D vision › neural rendering
3d gaussian splatting
0.912025
EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.912025
EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene reconstruction
dynamic scene reconstruction
0.912025
EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation · ICLR 2025
Visual content generation and editing
3d content generation
0.912025
EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation · ICLR 2025
Visual content generation and editing › video generation
multi-view video generation
0.912025
EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
comparative reasoning
0.812024
Predicting Text Preference Via Structured Comparative Reasoning · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.812024
Explanation-aware Soft Ensemble Empowers Large Language Model In-context Learning · ACL (1) 2024
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial search
0.612022
Example-based Spatial Search at Scale · ICDE 2022
Mathematical optimization › large-scale optimization › decomposition methods
hierarchical decomposition
0.612022
Example-based Spatial Search at Scale · ICDE 2022
Computational geometry › spatial data structures
spatial indexing
0.612022
Example-based Spatial Search at Scale · ICDE 2022
Data integration and cleaning
data preprocessing
0.512021
DataPrep.EDA: Task-Centric Exploratory Data Analysis for Statistical Modeling in Python · SIGMOD Conference 2021
Data mining
exploratory data analysis
0.512021
DataPrep.EDA: Task-Centric Exploratory Data Analysis for Statistical Modeling in Python · SIGMOD Conference 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › causal fairness
causal fairness analysis
0.412020
Silva: Interactively Assessing Machine Learning Fairness Using Causality · CHI 2020
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing
data cleaning
0.412020
SCODED: Statistical Constraint Oriented Data Error Detection · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Empirical software engineering › practitioner studies
practitioner interview study
0.312026
Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems · CHI 2026
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
video diffusion model
0.312025
EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation · ICLR 2025
Empirical software engineering › software analytics
interaction log analysis
0.112021
Tessera: Discretizing Data Analysis Workflows on a Task Level · CHI 2021
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics › visual analysis
causality visualization
0.112020
Silva: Interactively Assessing Machine Learning Fairness Using Causality · CHI 2020
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics
interactive visual analysis
0.112020
Silva: Interactively Assessing Machine Learning Fairness Using Causality · CHI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 4.0thematic analysis · 3.0score distillation sampling · 1.7gaussian splatting · 1.7diffusion prior · 1.7attention injection · 1.7hierarchical partitioning · 1.1LoRA · 1.1sequence segmentation · 1.0clustering · 1.0soft ensemble · 0.8large language model · 0.8explanation-aware ensemble · 0.8attention mechanism · 0.8think-aloud study · 0.5log analysis · 0.5statistical constraint · 0.4interactive visualization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems
abstract
Recommender systems (RS), which are widely deployed across high-stakes domains, are susceptible to biases that can cause large-scale societal impacts. Researchers have proposed methods to measure and mitigate such biases—but translating academic theory into practice is inherently challenging. Through a semi-structured interview study (N=11), we map the RS practitioner workflow within large technology companies, focusing on how technical teams consider fairness internally and in collaboration with legal, data, and fairness teams. We identify key challenges to incorporating fairness into existing RS workflows: defining fairness in RS contexts, balancing multi-stakeholder interests, and navigating dynamic environments. We also identify key organization-wide challenges: making time for fairness work and facilitating cross-team communication. Finally, we offer actionable recommendations for the RS community, including practitioners and HCI researchers.
Jing Nathan Yan, Emma Harvey, Junxiong Wang, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski, Allison Koenecke
CHI1
2025 EG4D: Explicit Generation of 4D Object without Score Distillation
abstract
In recent years, the increasing demand for dynamic 3D assets in design and gaming applications has given rise to powerful generative pipelines capable of synthesizing high-quality 4D objects. Previous methods generally rely on score distillation sampling (SDS) algorithm to infer the unseen views and motion of 4D objects, thus leading to unsatisfactory results with defects like over-saturation and Janus problem. Therefore, inspired by recent progress of video diffusion models, we propose to optimize a 4D representation by explicitly generating multi-view videos from one input image. However, it is far from trivial to handle practical challenges faced by such a pipeline, including dramatic temporal inconsistency, inter-frame geometry and texture diversity, and semantic defects brought by video generation results. To address these issues, we propose EG4D, a novel multi-stage framework that generates high-quality and consistent 4D assets without score distillation. Specifically, collaborative techniques and solutions are developed, including an attention injection strategy to synthesize temporal-consistent multi-view videos, a robust and efficient dynamic reconstruction method based on Gaussian Splatting, and a refinement stage with diffusion prior for semantic restoration. The qualitative comparisons and quantitative results demonstrate that our framework outperforms the baselines in generation quality by a considerable margin.
Qi Sun 0005, Zhiyang Guo, Ziyu Wan, Jing Nathan Yan, Shengming Yin, Wengang Zhou 0001, Jing Liao 0001, Houqiang Li
ICLR4
2024 Predicting Text Preference Via Structured Comparative Reasoning
abstract
Jing Nathan Yan, Tianqi Liu, Justin Chiu, Jiaming Shen, Zhen Qin, Yue Yu, Charumathi Lakshmanan, Yair Kurzion, Alexander Rush, Jialu Liu, Michael Bendersky. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Jing Nathan Yan, Tianqi Liu 0002, Justin T. Chiu, Zhen Qin 0001, Yue Yu 0001, Charumathi Lakshmanan, Yair Kurzion, Alexander M. Rush, Michael Bendersky
ACL (1)1
2024 Explanation-aware Soft Ensemble Empowers Large Language Model In-context Learning
abstract
Yue Yu, Jiaming Shen, Tianqi Liu, Zhen Qin, Jing Nathan Yan, Jialu Liu, Chao Zhang, Michael Bendersky. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Yue Yu 0001, Tianqi Liu 0002, Zhen Qin 0001, Jing Nathan Yan, Chao Zhang 0014, Michael Bendersky
ACL (1)5
2024 Diffusion Models Without Attention
abstract
In recent advancements in high-fidelity image generation, Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) have emerged as a key player. However, their application at high resolutions presents significant computational challenges. Current methods, such as patchifying, expedite processes in UNet and Transformer architectures but at the expense of rep-resentational capacity. Addressing this, we introduce the Dif-fusion State Space Model (DIFFUSSM), an architecture that supplants attention mechanisms with a more scalable state space model backbone. This approach effectively handles higher resolutions without resorting to global compression, thus preserving detailed image representation throughout the diffusion process. Our focus on FLOP-efficient architectures in diffusion training marks a significant step forward. Comprehensive evaluations on both ImageNet and LSUN datasets at two resolutions demonstrate that DiffuSSMs are on par or even outperform existing diffusion models with attention modules in FID and Inception Score metrics while significantly reducing total FLOP usage.
Jing Nathan Yan, Jiatao Gu, Alexander M. Rush
CVPR1
2022 Example-based Spatial Search at Scale
abstract
Searching spatial objects is a fundamental task in spatial services such as online maps. Traditional search methods are based on filtering conditions, burdening users to specify their requirements. This paper focuses on spatial search via examples. Particularly, the user can specify an example, which is a set of objects of interest, and the purpose is to find a list of results, each containing a set of objects with similar properties to the given example. We conducted a user study, showing that a search interface based on examples can effectively complement existing approaches. However, the existing example-based search is not scalable, hindering its applications to larger datasets. To address this challenge, we propose two new algorithms, namely HSP and LORA, to efficiently answer example-based spatial queries. HSP is an algorithm based on a hierarchical partitioning of the search space, and it achieves up to 20 times faster than the state-of-the-art algorithm. LORA further improves the efficiency, running up to 5000 times faster than the state-of-the-art algorithm. We present a systematic evaluation to demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithms.
Siqiang Luo, Jieming Shi 0001, Jing Nathan Yan, Weiwei Sun 0008
ICDE4
2021 Tessera: Discretizing Data Analysis Workflows on a Task Level
abstract
Researchers have investigated a number of strategies for capturing and analyzing data analyst event logs in order to design better tools, identify failure points, and guide users. However, this remains challenging because individual- and session-level behavioral differences lead to an explosion of complexity and there are few guarantees that log observations map to user cognition. In this paper we introduce a technique for segmenting sequential analyst event logs which combines data, interaction, and user features in order to create discrete blocks of goal-directed activity. Using measures of inter-dependency and comparisons between analysis states, these blocks identify patterns in interaction logs coupled with the current view that users are examining. Through an analysis of publicly available data and data from a lab study across a variety of analysis tasks, we validate that our segmentation approach aligns with users’ changing goals and tasks. Finally, we identify several downstream applications for our approach.
Jing Nathan Yan, Ziwei Gu, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski
CHI1
2021 DataPrep.EDA: Task-Centric Exploratory Data Analysis for Statistical Modeling in Python
abstract
Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is a crucial step in any data science project. However, existing Python libraries fall short in supporting data scientists to complete common EDA tasks for statistical modeling. Their API design is either too low level, which is optimized for plotting rather than EDA, or too high level, which is hard to specify more fine-grained EDA tasks. In response, we propose DataPrep.EDA, a novel task-centric EDA system in Python. DataPrep.EDA allows data scientists to declaratively specify a wide range of EDA tasks in different granularity with a single function call. We identify a number of challenges to implement DataPrep.EDA, and propose effective solutions to improve the scalability, usability, customizability of the system. In particular, we discuss some lessons learned from using Dask to build the data processing pipelines for EDA tasks and describe our approaches to accelerate the pipelines. We conduct extensive experiments to compare DataPrep.EDA with Pandas-profiling, the state-of-the-art EDA system in Python. The experiments show that DataPrep.EDA significantly outperforms Pandas-profiling in terms of both speed and user experience. DataPrep.EDA is open-sourced as an EDA component of DataPrep: https://github.com/sfu-db/dataprep.
Jinglin Peng, Weiyuan Wu, Brandon Lockhart, Song Bian 0002, Jing Nathan Yan, Linghao Xu, Zhixuan Chi, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski, Jiannan Wang 0001
SIGMOD Conference5
2021 Understanding User Sensemaking in Machine Learning Fairness Assessment Systems
abstract
A variety of systems have been proposed to assist users in detecting machine learning (ML) fairness issues. These systems approach bias reduction from a number of perspectives, including recommender systems, exploratory tools, and dashboards. In this paper, we seek to inform the design of these systems by examining how individuals make sense of fairness issues as they use different de-biasing affordances. In particular, we consider the tension between de-biasing recommendations which are quick but may lack nuance and ”what-if” style exploration which is time consuming but may lead to deeper understanding and transferable insights. Using logs, think-aloud data, and semi-structured interviews we find that exploratory systems promote a rich pattern of hypothesis generation and testing, while recommendations deliver quick answers which satisfy participants at the cost of reduced information exposure. We highlight design requirements and trade-offs in the design of ML fairness systems to promote accurate and explainable assessments.
Ziwei Gu, Jing Nathan Yan, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski
WWW2
2020 Silva: Interactively Assessing Machine Learning Fairness Using Causality
abstract
Machine learning models risk encoding unfairness on the part of their developers or data sources. However, assessing fairness is challenging as analysts might misidentify sources of bias, fail to notice them, or misapply metrics. In this paper we introduce Silva, a system for exploring potential sources of unfairness in datasets or machine learning models interactively. Silva directs user attention to relationships between attributes through a global causal view, provides interactive recommendations, presents intermediate results, and visualizes metrics. We describe the implementation of Silva, identify salient design and technical challenges, and provide an evaluation of the tool in comparison to an existing fairness optimization tool.
Jing Nathan Yan, Ziwei Gu, Hubert Lin, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski
CHI1
2020 SCODED: Statistical Constraint Oriented Data Error Detection
abstract
Statistical Constraints (SCs) play an important role in statistical modeling and analysis. This paper brings the concept to data cleaning and studies how to leverage SCs for error detection. SCs provide a novel approach that has various application scenarios and works harmoniously with downstream statistical modeling. Entailment relationships between SCs and integrity constraints provide analytical insight into SCs. We develop SCODED, an SC-Oriented Data Error Detection system, comprising two key components: (1) SC Violation Detection : checks whether an SC is violated on a given dataset, and (2) Error Drill Down : identifies the top-k records that contribute most to the violation of an SC. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data show that SCs are effective in detecting data errors that violate them, compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
Jing Nathan Yan, Oliver Schulte, Mohan Zhang, Jiannan Wang 0001, Reynold Cheng
SIGMOD Conference1