EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chaoyue He
dblp:236/5689
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5728-9672ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 44% Question answering and dialogue systems · 44% Language models and text generation · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 77% Computational finance and economics · 23% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
document question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMESGBench: Pioneering Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning Benchmark for ESG Tasks · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
multimodal document understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMESGBench: Pioneering Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning Benchmark for ESG Tasks · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ESGenius: Benchmarking LLMs on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainability Knowledge · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 1.7multimodal LLM · 1.7human-AI collaborative annotation · 1.7benchmark construction · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ESGenius: Benchmarking LLMs on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainability KnowledgeabstractChaoyue He, Xin Zhou, Yi Wu, Xinjia Yu, Yan Zhang, Lei Zhang, Di Wang, Shengfei Lyu, Hong Xu, Wang Xiaoqiao, Wei Liu, Chunyan Miao. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Chaoyue He, Xin Zhou 0008, Xinjia Yu, Lei Zhang 0199, Di Wang 0004, Shengfei Lyu, Hong Xu 0004, Xiaoqiao Wang, Chunyan Miao |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | MMESGBench: Pioneering Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning Benchmark for ESG TasksabstractEnvironmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports are essential for assessing sustainability, regulatory compliance, and financial transparency. However, these documents are typically long, multimodal, and structurally complex, combining dense text, tables, figures, and layout-sensitive semantics. Existing AI systems often struggle to perform reliable document-level reasoning in such settings, and no dedicated benchmark currently exists in ESG domain. To fill the gap, we introduce MMESGBench, a first-of-its-kind benchmark dataset targeted to evaluate multimodal understanding and reasoning across multi-source ESG documents. This dataset is constructed via a human-AI collaborative, multi-stage pipeline. First, a multimodal LLM generates candidate question-answer (QA) pairs by jointly interpreting textual, tabular, and visual information from layout-aware document pages. Second, an LLM verifies the semantic accuracy, completeness, and reasoning complexity of each QA pair. This automated process is followed by an expert-in-the-loop validation, where domain specialists validate and calibrate QA pairs to ensure quality, relevance, and diversity. MMESGBench comprises 933 validated QA pairs derived from 45 ESG documents, spanning across seven distinct document types and three major ESG source categories. Questions are categorized as single-page, cross-page, or unanswerable, with each accompanied by fine-grained multimodal evidence. Initial experiments validate that multimodal and retrieval-augmented models substantially outperform text-only baselines. MMESGBench is publicly available as an open-source dataset at https://github.com/Zhanglei1103/MMESGBench. Lei Zhang 0199, Xin Zhou 0008, Chaoyue He, Di Wang 0004, Hong Xu 0004, Chunyan Miao |
ACM Multimedia | 3 |