Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Chaoyue He

dblp:236/5689 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5728-9672ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 44% Question answering and dialogue systems · 44% Language models and text generation · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 77% Computational finance and economics · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
document question answering
0.912025
MMESGBench: Pioneering Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning Benchmark for ESG Tasks · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
multimodal document understanding
0.912025
MMESGBench: Pioneering Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning Benchmark for ESG Tasks · ACM Multimedia 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312025
ESGenius: Benchmarking LLMs on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainability Knowledge · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 1.7multimodal LLM · 1.7human-AI collaborative annotation · 1.7benchmark construction · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ESGenius: Benchmarking LLMs on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainability Knowledge
abstract
Chaoyue He, Xin Zhou, Yi Wu, Xinjia Yu, Yan Zhang, Lei Zhang, Di Wang, Shengfei Lyu, Hong Xu, Wang Xiaoqiao, Wei Liu, Chunyan Miao. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Chaoyue He, Xin Zhou 0008, Xinjia Yu, Lei Zhang 0199, Di Wang 0004, Shengfei Lyu, Hong Xu 0004, Xiaoqiao Wang, Chunyan Miao
EMNLP1
2025 MMESGBench: Pioneering Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning Benchmark for ESG Tasks
abstract
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports are essential for assessing sustainability, regulatory compliance, and financial transparency. However, these documents are typically long, multimodal, and structurally complex, combining dense text, tables, figures, and layout-sensitive semantics. Existing AI systems often struggle to perform reliable document-level reasoning in such settings, and no dedicated benchmark currently exists in ESG domain. To fill the gap, we introduce MMESGBench, a first-of-its-kind benchmark dataset targeted to evaluate multimodal understanding and reasoning across multi-source ESG documents. This dataset is constructed via a human-AI collaborative, multi-stage pipeline. First, a multimodal LLM generates candidate question-answer (QA) pairs by jointly interpreting textual, tabular, and visual information from layout-aware document pages. Second, an LLM verifies the semantic accuracy, completeness, and reasoning complexity of each QA pair. This automated process is followed by an expert-in-the-loop validation, where domain specialists validate and calibrate QA pairs to ensure quality, relevance, and diversity. MMESGBench comprises 933 validated QA pairs derived from 45 ESG documents, spanning across seven distinct document types and three major ESG source categories. Questions are categorized as single-page, cross-page, or unanswerable, with each accompanied by fine-grained multimodal evidence. Initial experiments validate that multimodal and retrieval-augmented models substantially outperform text-only baselines. MMESGBench is publicly available as an open-source dataset at https://github.com/Zhanglei1103/MMESGBench.
Lei Zhang 0199, Xin Zhou 0008, Chaoyue He, Di Wang 0004, Hong Xu 0004, Chunyan Miao
ACM Multimedia3