Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Naren Manoj

dblp:236/5698 · also Naren Sarayu Manoj · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9353-4882ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 41% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 27% Mathematical optimization · 15%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 54% Learning theory · 46%

Topics — the 25 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
1.322024
Near-Optimal Streaming Ellipsoidal Rounding for General Convex Polytopes · STOC 2024
Streaming Algorithms for Ellipsoidal Approximation of Convex Polytopes · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.922021
Excess Capacity and Backdoor Poisoning · NeurIPS 2021
Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify L∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Images · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Mathematical optimization
importance sampling
0.912025
The Change-of-Measure Method, Block Lewis Weights, and Approximating Matrix Block Norms · SODA 2025
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
iterative solver
0.912025
The Change-of-Measure Method, Block Lewis Weights, and Approximating Matrix Block Norms · SODA 2025
Algorithms and data structures
lewis weights
0.912025
The Change-of-Measure Method, Block Lewis Weights, and Approximating Matrix Block Norms · SODA 2025
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
linear system solving
0.912025
The Change-of-Measure Method, Block Lewis Weights, and Approximating Matrix Block Norms · SODA 2025
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix norm estimation
0.912025
The Change-of-Measure Method, Block Lewis Weights, and Approximating Matrix Block Norms · SODA 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection
0.812024
On the Robustness of Spectral Algorithms for Semirandom Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2024
Computational geometry › polytopes
convex polytope
0.812024
Near-Optimal Streaming Ellipsoidal Rounding for General Convex Polytopes · STOC 2024
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
geometric streaming
0.812024
Near-Optimal Streaming Ellipsoidal Rounding for General Convex Polytopes · STOC 2024
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph clustering
0.812024
On the Robustness of Spectral Algorithms for Semirandom Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2024
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
spectral clustering
0.812024
On the Robustness of Spectral Algorithms for Semirandom Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2024
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering › community detection
stochastic block model
0.812024
On the Robustness of Spectral Algorithms for Semirandom Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.722024
Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify L∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Images · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
On the Robustness of Spectral Algorithms for Semirandom Stochastic Block Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
agnostic learning
0.712023
Shortest Program Interpolation Learning · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
minimum description length
0.712023
Shortest Program Interpolation Learning · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › overfitting
tempered overfitting
0.712023
Shortest Program Interpolation Learning · COLT 2023
Computational geometry › convex geometry
convex body approximation
0.612022
Streaming Algorithms for Ellipsoidal Approximation of Convex Polytopes · COLT 2022
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
geometric approximation
0.612022
Streaming Algorithms for Ellipsoidal Approximation of Convex Polytopes · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.512021
Excess Capacity and Backdoor Poisoning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › backdoor defense
backdoor detection
0.512021
Excess Capacity and Backdoor Poisoning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › network capacity
memorization capacity
0.512021
Excess Capacity and Backdoor Poisoning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.512021
Excess Capacity and Backdoor Poisoning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
0.412020
Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify L∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Images · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
randomized smoothing
0.412020
Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify L∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Images · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral bisection · 1.5laplacian eigenvectors · 1.5change-of-measure method · 0.9john's theorem · 0.8coreset construction · 0.8robust generalization · 0.5adversarial training · 0.5randomized smoothing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The Change-of-Measure Method, Block Lewis Weights, and Approximating Matrix Block Norms
abstract
Given a matrix A ∈ ℝn×d, a partitioning of [n] into groups S1,…, Sm, an outer norm p, and inner norms such that either p ≥ 1 and p1,. ..,pm ≥ 2 or p1 = · · · = pm = p ≥ 1/ log d, we prove that there is a sparse weight vector ß ∈ ℝm such that , where the number of nonzero entries of ß is at most . When p1 …,pm ≥ 2, this weight vector arises from an importance sampling procedure based on the block Lewis weights, a recently proposed generalization of Lewis weights. Additionally, we give efficient algorithms to find the sparse weight vector ß in several regimes of p and p1,…, pm. Our results imply an algorithm for minimizing sums of Euclidean norms in linear system solves, improving over the previously known iteration complexity when m » d.
Naren Manoj, Max Ovsiankin
SODA1
2024 Dueling Optimization with a Monotone Adversary
abstract
We introduce and study the problem of \textit{dueling optimization with a monotone adversary}, which is a generalization of (noiseless) dueling convex optimization. The goal is to design an online algorithm to find a minimizer $\bm{x}^{\star}$ for a function $f\colon \mathcal{X} \to \mathbb{R}$, where $\mathcal{X} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$. In each round, the algorithm submits a pair of guesses, i.e., $\bm{x}^{(1)}$ and $\bm{x}^{(2)}$, and the adversary responds with \textit{any} point in the space that is at least as good as both guesses. The cost of each query is the suboptimality of the worse of the two guesses; i.e., ${\max} \left( f(\bm{x}^{(1)}), f(\bm{x}^{(2)}) \right) - f(\bm{x}^{\star})$. The goal is to minimize the number of iterations required to find an $\eps$-optimal point and to minimize the total cost (regret) of the guesses over many rounds. Our main result is an efficient randomized algorithm for several natural choices of the function $f$ and set $\mathcal{X}$ that incurs cost $O(d)$ and iteration complexity $O(d\log(1/\varepsilon)^2)$. Moreover, our dependence on $d$ is asymptotically optimal, as we show examples in which any randomized algorithm for this problem must incur $\Omega(d)$ cost and iteration complexity.
Avrim Blum, Meghal Gupta, Gene Li, Naren Manoj, Aadirupa Saha
ALT4
2024 On the Robustness of Spectral Algorithms for Semirandom Stochastic Block Models
abstract
In a graph bisection problem, we are given a graph $G$ with two equally-sized unlabeled communities, and the goal is to recover the vertices in these communities. A popular heuristic, known as spectral clustering, is to output an estimated community assignment based on the eigenvector corresponding to the second-smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian of $G$. Spectral algorithms can be shown to provably recover the cluster structure for graphs generated from probabilistic models, such as the Stochastic Block Model (SBM). However, spectral clustering is known to be non-robust to model mis-specification. Techniques based on semidefinite programming have been shown to be more robust, but they incur significant computational overheads. In this work, we study the robustness of spectral algorithms against semirandom adversaries. Informally, a semirandom adversary is allowed to ``helpfully'' change the specification of the model in a way that is consistent with the ground-truth solution. Our semirandom adversaries in particular are allowed to add edges inside clusters or increase the probability that an edge appears inside a cluster. Semirandom adversaries are a useful tool to determine the extent to which an algorithm has overfit to statistical assumptions on the input. On the positive side, we identify a wide range of semirandom adversaries under which spectral bisection using the _unnormalized_ Laplacian is strongly consistent, i.e., it exactly recovers the planted partitioning. On the negative side, we show that in many of these settings, _normalized_ spectral bisection outputs a partitioning that makes a classification mistake on a constant fraction of the vertices. Finally, we demonstrate numerical experiments that complement our theoretical findings.
Aditya Bhaskara, Agastya Vibhuti Jha, Michael Kapralov, Naren Manoj, Davide Mazzali, Weronika Wrzos-Kaminska
NeurIPS4
2024 Near-Optimal Streaming Ellipsoidal Rounding for General Convex Polytopes
abstract
We give near-optimal algorithms for computing an ellipsoidal rounding of a convex polytope whose vertices are given in a stream. The approximation factor is linear in the dimension (as in John's theorem) and only loses an excess logarithmic factor in the aspect ratio of the polytope. Our algorithms are nearly optimal in two senses: first, their runtimes nearly match those of the most efficient known algorithms for the offline version of the problem. Second, their approximation factors nearly match a lower bound we show against a natural class of geometric streaming algorithms. In contrast to existing works in the streaming setting that compute ellipsoidal roundings only for centrally symmetric convex polytopes, our algorithms apply to general convex polytopes. We also show how to use our algorithms to construct coresets from a stream of points that approximately preserve both the ellipsoidal rounding and the convex hull of the original set of points.
Yury Makarychev, Naren Manoj, Max Ovsiankin
STOC2
2023 Shortest Program Interpolation Learning
abstract
We prove that the Minimum Program Length learning rule exhibits tempered overfitting. We obtain tempered agnostic finite sample learning guarantees and characterize the asymptotic behavior in the presence of random label noise.
Naren Manoj, Nathan Srebro
COLT1
2022 Streaming Algorithms for Ellipsoidal Approximation of Convex Polytopes
abstract
We give efficient deterministic one-pass streaming algorithms for finding an ellipsoidal approximation of a symmetric convex polytope. The algorithms are near-optimal in that their approximation factors differ from that of the optimal offline solution only by a factor sub-logarithmic in the aspect ratio of the polytope.
Yury Makarychev, Naren Manoj, Max Ovsiankin
COLT2
2021 Excess Capacity and Backdoor Poisoning
abstract
A backdoor data poisoning attack is an adversarial attack wherein the attacker injects several watermarked, mislabeled training examples into a training set. The watermark does not impact the test-time performance of the model on typical data; however, the model reliably errs on watermarked examples.To gain a better foundational understanding of backdoor data poisoning attacks, we present a formal theoretical framework within which one can discuss backdoor data poisoning attacks for classification problems. We then use this to analyze important statistical and computational issues surrounding these attacks.On the statistical front, we identify a parameter we call the memorization capacity that captures the intrinsic vulnerability of a learning problem to a backdoor attack. This allows us to argue about the robustness of several natural learning problems to backdoor attacks. Our results favoring the attacker involve presenting explicit constructions of backdoor attacks, and our robustness results show that some natural problem settings cannot yield successful backdoor attacks.From a computational standpoint, we show that under certain assumptions, adversarial training can detect the presence of backdoors in a training set. We then show that under similar assumptions, two closely related problems we call backdoor filtering and robust generalization are nearly equivalent. This implies that it is both asymptotically necessary and sufficient to design algorithms that can identify watermarked examples in the training set in order to obtain a learning algorithm that both generalizes well to unseen data and is robust to backdoors.
Naren Manoj, Avrim Blum
NeurIPS1
2020 Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify L∞ Robustness for High-Dimensional Images
Avrim Blum, Travis Dick, Naren Manoj, Hongyang Zhang 0001
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3