Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matt Jordan
dblp:236/5728
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 34% Generative modeling · 21% Language models and text generation · 10% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.9 | 4 | 2022 | Zonotope Domains for Lagrangian Neural Network Verification · NeurIPS 2022 Provable Lipschitz Certification for Generative Models · ICML 2021 Exactly Computing the Local Lipschitz Constant of ReLU Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditional Generative Models are Sufficient to Sample from Any Causal Effect Estimand · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditional Generative Models are Sufficient to Sample from Any Causal Effect Estimand · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditional Generative Models are Sufficient to Sample from Any Causal Effect Estimand · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint optimization
lagrangian decomposition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Zonotope Domains for Lagrangian Neural Network Verification · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Zonotope Domains for Lagrangian Neural Network Verification · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
lipschitz certification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Provable Lipschitz Certification for Generative Models · ICML 2021 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Inverse Problems Leveraging Pre-trained Contrastive Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Inverse Problems Leveraging Pre-trained Contrastive Representations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Provable Certificates for Adversarial Examples: Fitting a Ball in the Union of Polytopes · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 1.0push-forward computation · 0.8model-based filtering · 0.8deduplication · 0.8causal identification · 0.8dual ascent · 0.6abstract interpretation · 0.6zonotope approximation · 0.5vector-jacobian product · 0.5linear probe · 0.5convex relaxation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Datasets, Documents, and Repetitions: The Practicalities of Unequal Data QualityabstractData filtering has become a powerful tool for improving model performance while reducing computational cost. However, as large language model compute budgets continue to grow, the limited data volume provided by heavily filtered and deduplicated datasets will become a practical constraint. In efforts to better understand how to proceed, we study model performance at various compute budgets and across multiple pre-training datasets created through data filtering and deduplication. We find that, given appropriate modifications to the training recipe, repeating existing aggressively filtered datasets for up to ten epochs can outperform training on the ten times larger superset for a single epoch across multiple compute budget orders of magnitude. While this finding relies on repeating the dataset for many epochs, we also investigate repeats within these datasets at the document level. We find that not all documents within a dataset are equal, and we can create better datasets relative to a token budget by explicitly manipulating the counts of individual documents. We conclude by arguing that even as large language models scale, data filtering remains an important direction of research. Alex Fang, Hadi Pouransari, Matt Jordan, Alexander Toshev, Vaishaal Shankar, Ludwig Schmidt, Tom Gunter |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelsabstractWe introduce DataComp for Language Models, a testbed for controlled dataset experiments with the goal of improving language models.As part of DCLM, we provide a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations.Participants in the DCLM benchmark can experiment with data curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing atmodel scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters.As a baseline for DCLM, we conduct extensive experiments and find that model-based filtering is key to assembling a high-quality training set.The resulting dataset, DCLM-Baseline, enables training a 7B parameter language model from scratch to 63% 5-shot accuracy on MMLU with 2T training tokens.Compared to MAP-Neo, the previous state-of-the-art in open-data language models, DCLM-Baseline represents a 6 percentage point improvement on MMLU while being trained with half the compute.Our results highlight the importance of dataset design for training language models and offer a starting point for further research on data curation. We release the \dclm benchmark, framework, models, and datasets at https://www.datacomp.ai/dclm/ Jeffrey Li, Alex Fang, Georgios Smyrnis, Maor Ivgi, Matt Jordan, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Hritik Bansal, Etash Kumar Guha, Sedrick Keh, Kushal Arora, Niklas Muennighoff, Reinhard Heckel, Jean Mercat, Mayee F. Chen, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Alon Albalak, Yonatan Bitton, Marianna Nezhurina, Amro Abbas, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Dhruba Ghosh, Josh Gardner 0001, Maciej Kilian, Hanlin Zhang 0002, Rulin Shao, Sarah M. Pratt, Sunny Sanyal, Gabriel Ilharco, Giannis Daras, Kalyani Marathe, Aaron Gokaslan, Jieyu Zhang 0001, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Igor Vasiljevic, Sham M. Kakade, Shuran Song, Sujay Sanghavi, Fartash Faghri, Sewoong Oh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Kyle Lo, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Hadi Pouransari, Alexander Toshev, Stephanie Wang, Dirk Groeneveld, Luca Soldaini, Pang Wei Koh, Jenia Jitsev, Thomas Kollar, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Yair Carmon, Achal Dave, Ludwig Schmidt, Vaishaal Shankar |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | Conditional Generative Models are Sufficient to Sample from Any Causal Effect EstimandabstractCausal inference from observational data plays critical role in many applications in trustworthy machine learning.
While sound and complete algorithms exist to compute causal effects, many of them assume access to conditional likelihoods,
which is difficult to estimate for high-dimensional (particularly image) data. Researchers have alleviated this issue by simulating causal relations with neural models. However, when we have high-dimensional variables in the causal graph along with some unobserved confounders, no existing work can effectively sample from the un/conditional interventional distributions. In this work, we show how to sample from any identifiable interventional distribution given an arbitrary causal graph through a sequence of push-forward computations of conditional generative models, such as diffusion models. Our proposed algorithm follows the recursive steps of the existing likelihood-based identification algorithms to train a set of feed-forward models, and connect them in a specific way to sample from the desired distribution. We conduct experiments on a Colored MNIST dataset having both the treatment ($X$) and the target variables ($Y$) as images and sample from $P(y|do(x))$. Our algorithm also enables us to conduct a causal analysis to evaluate spurious correlations among input features of generative models pre-trained on the CelebA dataset. Finally, we generate high-dimensional interventional samples from the MIMIC-CXR dataset involving text and image variables. Md. Musfiqur Rahman, Matt Jordan, Murat Kocaoglu |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Zonotope Domains for Lagrangian Neural Network VerificationabstractNeural network verification aims to provide provable bounds for the output of a neural network for a given input range. Notable prior works in this domain have either generated bounds using abstract domains, which preserve some dependency between intermediate neurons in the network; or framed verification as an optimization problem and solved a relaxation using Lagrangian methods. A key drawback of the latter technique is that each neuron is treated independently, thereby ignoring important neuron interactions. We provide an approach that merges these two threads and uses zonotopes within a Lagrangian decomposition. Crucially, we can decompose the problem of verifying a deep neural network into the verification of many 2-layer neural networks. While each of these problems is provably hard, we provide efficient relaxation methods that are amenable to efficient dual ascent procedures. Our technique yields bounds that improve upon both linear programming and Lagrangian-based verification techniques in both time and bound tightness. Matt Jordan, Jonathan Hayase, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Sewoong Oh |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Provable Lipschitz Certification for Generative ModelsabstractWe present a scalable technique for upper bounding the Lipschitz constant of generative models. We relate this quantity to the maximal norm over the set of attainable vector-Jacobian products of a given generative model. We approximate this set by layerwise convex approximations using zonotopes. Our approach generalizes and improves upon prior work using zonotope transformers and we extend to Lipschitz estimation of neural networks with large output dimension. This provides efficient and tight bounds on small networks and can scale to generative models on VAE and DCGAN architectures. Matt Jordan, Alexandros G. Dimakis |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Inverse Problems Leveraging Pre-trained Contrastive RepresentationsabstractWe study a new family of inverse problems for recovering representations of corrupted data. We assume access to a pre-trained representation learning network R(x) that operates on clean images, like CLIP. The problem is to recover the representation of an image R(x), if we are only given a corrupted version A(x), for some known forward operator A. We propose a supervised inversion method that uses a contrastive objective to obtain excellent representations for highly corrupted images. Using a linear probe on our robust representations, we achieve a higher accuracy than end-to-end supervised baselines when classifying images with various types of distortions, including blurring, additive noise, and random pixel masking. We evaluate on a subset of ImageNet and observe that our method is robust to varying levels of distortion. Our method outperforms end-to-end baselines even with a fraction of the labeled data in a wide range of forward operators. Sriram Ravula, Georgios Smyrnis, Matt Jordan, Alexandros G. Dimakis |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Exactly Computing the Local Lipschitz Constant of ReLU NetworksabstractThe local Lipschitz constant of a neural network is a useful metric with applications in robustness, generalization, and fairness evaluation. We provide novel analytic results relating the local Lipschitz constant of nonsmooth vector-valued functions to a maximization over the norm of the generalized Jacobian. We present a sufficient condition for which backpropagation always returns an element of the generalized Jacobian, and reframe the problem over this broad class of functions. We show strong inapproximability results for estimating Lipschitz constants of ReLU networks, and then formulate an algorithm to compute these quantities exactly. We leverage this algorithm to evaluate the tightness of competing Lipschitz estimators and the effects of regularized training on the Lipschitz constant. Matt Jordan, Alexandros G. Dimakis |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Provable Certificates for Adversarial Examples: Fitting a Ball in the Union of PolytopesabstractWe propose a novel method for computing exact pointwise robustness of deep neural networks for all convex lp norms. Our algorithm, GeoCert, finds the largest lp ball centered at an input point x0, within which the output class of a given neural network with ReLU nonlinearities remains unchanged. We relate the problem of computing pointwise robustness of these networks to that of computing the maximum norm ball with a fixed center that can be contained in a non-convex polytope. This is a challenging problem in general, however we show that there exists an efficient algorithm to compute this for polyhedral complices. Further we show that piecewise linear neural networks partition the input space into a polyhedral complex. Our algorithm has the ability to almost immediately output a nontrivial lower bound to the pointwise robustness which is iteratively improved until it ultimately becomes tight. We empirically show that our approach generates a distance lower bounds that are tighter compared to prior work, under moderate time constraints. Matt Jordan, Justin Lewis, Alexandros G. Dimakis |
NeurIPS | 1 |