Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ibrahim Ekren
dblp:236/5884
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 44% Multi-agent systems · 17% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | A PDE approach for regret bounds under partial monitoring · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Prediction against a limited adversary · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural operator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Neural Operators Can Play Dynamic Stackelberg Games · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › game theory
stackelberg game |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Neural Operators Can Play Dynamic Stackelberg Games · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
partial monitoring |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A PDE approach for regret bounds under partial monitoring · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A PDE approach for regret bounds under partial monitoring · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › data corruption
adversarial corruption |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prediction against a limited adversary · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
prediction with expert advice |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prediction against a limited adversary · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
partial differential equations |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A PDE approach for regret bounds under partial monitoring · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
viscosity solutions |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A PDE approach for regret bounds under partial monitoring · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wasserstein space · 1.3viscosity solutions · 1.3partial differential equations · 1.3viscosity theory · 1.0universal approximation theorem · 0.9neural operator · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Neural Operators Can Play Dynamic Stackelberg GamesabstractDynamic Stackelberg games are a broad class of two-player games in which the leader acts first, and the follower chooses a response strategy to the leader's strategy. Unfortunately, only stylized Stackelberg games are explicitly solvable since the follower's best-response operator (as a function of the control of the leader) is typically analytically intractable. This paper addresses this issue by showing that the follower's best-response operator can be approximately implemented by an attention-based neural operator, uniformly on compact subsets of adapted open-loop controls for the leader. We further show that the value of the Stackelberg game where the follower uses the approximate best-response operator approximates the value of the original Stackelberg game. Our main result is obtained using our universal approximation theorem for attention-based neural operators between spaces of square-integrable adapted stochastic processes, as well as stability results for a general class of Stackelberg games. Guillermo A. Alvarez, Ibrahim Ekren, Anastasis Kratsios, Xuwei Yang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | A PDE approach for regret bounds under partial monitoringabstractIn this paper, we study a learning problem in which a forecaster only observes partial information. By properly rescaling the problem, we heuristically derive a limiting PDE on Wasserstein space which characterizes the asymptotic behavior of the regret of the forecaster. Using a verification type argument, we show that the problem of obtaining regret bounds and efficient algorithms can be tackled by finding appropriate smooth sub/supersolutions of this parabolic PDE. Erhan Bayraktar, Ibrahim Ekren, Xin Zhang 0080 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2021 | Prediction against a limited adversaryabstractWe study the problem of prediction with expert advice with adversarial corruption where the adversary can at most corrupt one expert. Using tools from viscosity theory, we characterize the long-time behavior of the value function of the game between the forecaster and the adversary. We provide lower and upper bounds for the growth rate of regret without relying on a comparison result. We show that depending on the description of regret, the limiting behavior of the game can significantly differ. Erhan Bayraktar, Ibrahim Ekren, Xin Zhang 0080 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |