Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson

dblp:236/6273 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2444-7048ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 31% Language models and text generation · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 16%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
inference-time intervention
0.912025
Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning
0.912025
Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.512021
PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
shape-constrained regression
0.512021
PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives · AAAI 2021
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization
0.512021
PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
neural network compression
0.412020
Tensor Regression Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
parameter reduction
0.412020
Tensor Regression Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Computational finance and economics › pricing
dynamic pricing
0.412019
Dynamic Pricing for Airline Ancillaries with Customer Context · KDD 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing
0.312025
Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

penalized derivatives · 1.0model compression · 0.9machine unlearning · 0.9knowledge editing · 0.9dynamic pricing model · 0.8customer context modeling · 0.8tensor regression · 0.4tensor contraction · 0.4low-rank multilinear mapping · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Composable Interventions for Language Models
abstract
Test-time interventions for language models can enhance factual accuracy, mitigate harmful outputs, and improve model efficiency without costly retraining. But despite a flood of new methods, different types of interventions are largely developing independently. In practice, multiple interventions must be applied sequentially to the same model, yet we lack standardized ways to study how interventions interact. We fill this gap by introducing composable interventions, a framework to study the effects of using multiple interventions on the same language models, featuring new metrics and a unified codebase. Using our framework, we conduct extensive experiments and compose popular methods from three emerging intervention categories---knowledge editing, model compression, and machine unlearning. Our results over 417 different compositions uncover meaningful interactions: compression hinders editing and unlearning, composing interventions hinges on their order of application, and popular general-purpose metrics are inadequate for assessing composability. Taken together, our findings showcase clear gaps in composability, suggesting a need for new multi-objective interventions.
Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Kyle O'Brien, Tianjin Huang, Shanghua Gao, Shiwei Liu 0003, Jonathan Schwarz, Anurag Vaidya, Faisal Mahmood 0001, Marinka Zitnik, Tianlong Chen 0001, Thomas Hartvigsen
ICLR1
2022 Deep Contrastive Anomaly Detection for Airline Ancillaries Prediction
abstract
The increasing range of ancillary products offered by airlines is making existing, static frameworks obsolete. The changing expectations of customers have created a need for more dynamic and reactive offers. In order to tailor an offer to an individual journey, it is possible to leverage similar journeys and the observed outcomes using a semi-supervised approach. In this paper, a multi-stage deep learning framework, namely Deep Ancillaries Prediction (DAP), is developed to understand personalised demand for airline ancillaries and enhance pricing strategies. DAP solves the overlapping distribution problem and class imbalances observed in real-world airline datasets. The framework incorporates a contrastive learning module to learn richer feature embeddings and an autoencoder for semi-supervised learning into one framework, and outperforms current ancillary prediction systems. The modules can be trained separately and hence, are suitable for an online learning setting. This framework is designed to be transferable to different prediction tasks. Significant performance enhancements are attained compared to the current state-of-the-art algorithms.
Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Naman Shukla, Javier A. Barria
ICMLA2
2021 PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives
Akhil Gupta, Lavanya Marla, Ruoyu Sun 0001, Naman Shukla, Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson
AAAI5
2020 Tensor Regression Networks
abstract
Convolutional neural networks typically consist of many convolutional layers followed by one or more fully connected layers. While convolutional layers map between high-order activation tensors, the fully connected layers operate on flattened activation vectors. Despite empirical success, this approach has notable drawbacks. Flattening followed by fully connected layers discards multilinear structure in the activations and requires many parameters. We address these problems by incorporating tensor algebraic operations that preserve multilinear structure at every layer. First, we introduce Tensor Contraction Layers (TCLs) that reduce the dimensionality of their input while preserving their multilinear structure using tensor contraction. Next, we introduce Tensor Regression Layers (TRLs), which express outputs through a low-rank multilinear mapping from a high-order activation tensor to an output tensor of arbitrary order. We learn the contraction and regression factors end-to-end, and produce accurate nets with fewer parameters. Additionally, our layers regularize networks by imposing low-rank constraints on the activations (TCL) and regression weights (TRL). Experiments on ImageNet show that, applied to VGG and ResNet architectures, TCLs and TRLs reduce the number of parameters compared to fully connected layers by more than 65% while maintaining or increasing accuracy. In addition to the space savings, our approach's ability to leverage topological structure can be crucial for structured data such as MRI. In particular, we demonstrate significant performance improvements over comparable architectures on three tasks associated with the UK Biobank dataset.
Jean Kossaifi, Zachary C. Lipton, Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Aran Khanna, Tommaso Furlanello, Anima Anandkumar
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2019 Dynamic Pricing for Airline Ancillaries with Customer Context
abstract
Ancillaries have become a major source of revenue and profitability in the travel industry. Yet, conventional pricing strategies are based on business rules that are poorly optimized and do not respond to changing market conditions. This paper describes the dynamic pricing model developed by Deepair solutions, an AI technology provider for travel suppliers. We present a pricing model that provides dynamic pricing recommendations specific to each customer interaction and optimizes expected revenue per customer. The unique nature of personalized pricing provides the opportunity to search over the market space to find the optimal price-point of each ancillary for each customer, without violating customer privacy.
Naman Shukla, Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Ken Otwell, Lavanya Marla, Kartik Yellepeddi
KDD2