Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson
dblp:236/6273
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2444-7048ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 31% Language models and text generation · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
inference-time intervention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
shape-constrained regression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
neural network compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Regression Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
parameter reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Regression Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Computational finance and economics › pricing
dynamic pricing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Dynamic Pricing for Airline Ancillaries with Customer Context · KDD 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
penalized derivatives · 1.0model compression · 0.9machine unlearning · 0.9knowledge editing · 0.9dynamic pricing model · 0.8customer context modeling · 0.8tensor regression · 0.4tensor contraction · 0.4low-rank multilinear mapping · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language ModelsabstractTest-time interventions for language models can enhance factual accuracy, mitigate harmful outputs, and improve model efficiency without costly retraining. But despite a flood of new methods, different types of interventions are largely developing independently.
In practice, multiple interventions must be applied sequentially to the same model, yet we lack standardized ways to study how interventions interact. We fill this gap by introducing composable interventions, a framework to study the effects of using multiple interventions on the same language models, featuring new metrics and a unified codebase. Using our framework, we conduct extensive experiments and compose popular methods from three emerging intervention categories---knowledge editing, model compression, and machine unlearning. Our results over 417 different compositions uncover meaningful interactions: compression hinders editing and unlearning, composing interventions hinges on their order of application, and popular general-purpose metrics are inadequate for assessing composability. Taken together, our findings showcase clear gaps in composability, suggesting a need for new multi-objective interventions. Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Kyle O'Brien, Tianjin Huang, Shanghua Gao, Shiwei Liu 0003, Jonathan Schwarz, Anurag Vaidya, Faisal Mahmood 0001, Marinka Zitnik, Tianlong Chen 0001, Thomas Hartvigsen |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Deep Contrastive Anomaly Detection for Airline Ancillaries PredictionabstractThe increasing range of ancillary products offered by airlines is making existing, static frameworks obsolete. The changing expectations of customers have created a need for more dynamic and reactive offers. In order to tailor an offer to an individual journey, it is possible to leverage similar journeys and the observed outcomes using a semi-supervised approach. In this paper, a multi-stage deep learning framework, namely Deep Ancillaries Prediction (DAP), is developed to understand personalised demand for airline ancillaries and enhance pricing strategies. DAP solves the overlapping distribution problem and class imbalances observed in real-world airline datasets. The framework incorporates a contrastive learning module to learn richer feature embeddings and an autoencoder for semi-supervised learning into one framework, and outperforms current ancillary prediction systems. The modules can be trained separately and hence, are suitable for an online learning setting. This framework is designed to be transferable to different prediction tasks. Significant performance enhancements are attained compared to the current state-of-the-art algorithms. Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Naman Shukla, Javier A. Barria |
ICMLA | 2 |
| 2021 | PenDer: Incorporating Shape Constraints via Penalized Derivatives
Akhil Gupta, Lavanya Marla, Ruoyu Sun 0001, Naman Shukla, Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2020 | Tensor Regression NetworksabstractConvolutional neural networks typically consist of many convolutional layers followed by one or more fully connected layers. While convolutional layers map between high-order activation tensors, the fully connected layers operate on flattened activation vectors. Despite empirical success, this approach has notable drawbacks. Flattening followed by fully connected layers discards multilinear structure in the activations and requires many parameters. We address these problems by incorporating tensor algebraic operations that preserve multilinear structure at every layer. First, we introduce Tensor Contraction Layers (TCLs) that reduce the dimensionality of their input while preserving their multilinear structure using tensor contraction. Next, we introduce Tensor Regression Layers (TRLs), which express outputs through a low-rank multilinear mapping from a high-order activation tensor to an output tensor of arbitrary order. We learn the contraction and regression factors end-to-end, and produce accurate nets with fewer parameters. Additionally, our layers regularize networks by imposing low-rank constraints on the activations (TCL) and regression weights (TRL). Experiments on ImageNet show that, applied to VGG and ResNet architectures, TCLs and TRLs reduce the number of parameters compared to fully connected layers by more than 65% while maintaining or increasing accuracy. In addition to the space savings, our approach's ability to leverage topological structure can be crucial for structured data such as MRI. In particular, we demonstrate significant performance improvements over comparable architectures on three tasks associated with the UK Biobank dataset. Jean Kossaifi, Zachary C. Lipton, Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Aran Khanna, Tommaso Furlanello, Anima Anandkumar |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2019 | Dynamic Pricing for Airline Ancillaries with Customer ContextabstractAncillaries have become a major source of revenue and profitability in the travel industry. Yet, conventional pricing strategies are based on business rules that are poorly optimized and do not respond to changing market conditions. This paper describes the dynamic pricing model developed by Deepair solutions, an AI technology provider for travel suppliers. We present a pricing model that provides dynamic pricing recommendations specific to each customer interaction and optimizes expected revenue per customer. The unique nature of personalized pricing provides the opportunity to search over the market space to find the optimal price-point of each ancillary for each customer, without violating customer privacy. Naman Shukla, Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Ken Otwell, Lavanya Marla, Kartik Yellepeddi |
KDD | 2 |