Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chinmay Talegaonkar
dblp:236/6869
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Rendering · 57% Computational photography and imaging · 24% Image and video coding · 19% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 70% Generative modeling · 30% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Repurposing Marigold for Zero-Shot Metric Depth Estimation via Defocus Blur Cues · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › monocular depth estimation
metric depth estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Repurposing Marigold for Zero-Shot Metric Depth Estimation via Defocus Blur Cues · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Repurposing Marigold for Zero-Shot Metric Depth Estimation via Defocus Blur Cues · NeurIPS 2025 |
Rendering
gaussian splatting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Volumetrically Consistent 3D Gaussian Rasterization · CVPR 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging › event-based vision
high-speed video reconstruction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RnGCam: High-Speed Video from Rolling & Global Shutter Measurements · ICCV 2025 |
Image and video coding
neural video representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RnGCam: High-Speed Video from Rolling & Global Shutter Measurements · ICCV 2025 |
Rendering
rasterization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Volumetrically Consistent 3D Gaussian Rasterization · CVPR 2025 |
Rendering
volume rendering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Volumetrically Consistent 3D Gaussian Rasterization · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Volumetrically Consistent 3D Gaussian Rasterization · CVPR 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging › depth of field
defocus blur |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Repurposing Marigold for Zero-Shot Metric Depth Estimation via Defocus Blur Cues · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
volume rendering equation · 1.7gradient-based optimization · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7analytic transmittance · 1.7rolling-shutter imaging · 0.9implicit neural representation · 0.9diffuser-based multiplexing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Volumetrically Consistent 3D Gaussian RasterizationabstractRecently, 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has enabled photorealistic view synthesis at high inference speeds. However, its splatting-based rendering model makes several approximations to the rendering equation, reducing physical accuracy. We show that the core approximations in splatting are unnecessary, even within a rasterizer; we instead volumetrically integrate 3D Gaussians directly to compute the transmittance across them analytically. We use this analytic transmittance to derive more physically-accurate alpha values than 3DGS, which can directly be used within their framework. The result is a method that more closely follows the volume rendering equation (similar to ray-tracing) while enjoying the speed benefits of rasterization. Our method represents opaque surfaces with higher accuracy and fewer points than 3DGS. This enables it to outperform 3DGS for view synthesis (measured in SSIM and LPIPS). Being volumetrically consistent also enables our method to work out of the box for tomography. We match the state-of-the-art 3DGS-based tomography method with fewer points. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/chinmay0301ucsd/Vol3DGS Chinmay Talegaonkar, Yash Belhe, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Nicholas Antipa |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | RnGCam: High-Speed Video from Rolling & Global Shutter MeasurementsabstractCompressive video capture encodes a short high-speed video into a single measurement using a low-speed sensor, then computationally reconstructs the original video. Prior implementations rely on expensive hardware and are restricted to imaging sparse scenes with empty backgrounds. We propose RnGCam, a system that fuses measurements from low-speed consumer-grade rolling-shutter (RS) and global-shutter (GS) sensors into video at kHz frame rates. The RS sensor is combined with a pseudorandom optic, called a diffuser, which spatially multiplexes scene information. The GS sensor is coupled with a conventional lens. The RS-diffuser provides low spatial detail and high temporal detail, complementing the GS-lens system's high spatial detail and low temporal detail. We propose a reconstruction method using implicit neural representations (INR) to fuse the measurements into a high-speed video. Our INR method separately models the static and dynamic scene components, while explicitly regularizing dynamics. In simulation, we show that our approach significantly outperforms previous RS compressive video methods, as well as state-of-the-art frame interpolators. We validate our approach in a dual-camera hardware setup, which generates 230 frames of video at 4,800 frames per second for dense scenes, using hardware that costs $10 \times$ less than previous compressive video systems. Kevin Tandi, Chinmay Talegaonkar, Gal Mishne, Nicholas Antipa |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2025 | Repurposing Marigold for Zero-Shot Metric Depth Estimation via Defocus Blur CuesabstractRecent monocular metric depth estimation (MMDE) methods have made notable progress towards zero-shot generalization. However, they still exhibit a significant performance drop on out-of-distribution datasets. We address this limitation by injecting defocus blur cues at inference time into Marigold, a \textit{pre-trained} diffusion model for zero-shot, scale-invariant monocular depth estimation (MDE). Our method effectively turns Marigold into a metric depth predictor in a training-free manner. To incorporate defocus cues, we capture two images with a small and a large aperture from the same viewpoint. To recover metric depth, we then optimize the metric depth scaling parameters and the noise latents of Marigold at inference time using gradients from a loss function based on the defocus-blur image formation model. We compare our method against existing state-of-the-art zero-shot MMDE methods on a self-collected real dataset, showing quantitative and qualitative improvements. Chinmay Talegaonkar, Nikhil Gandudi Suresh, Zachary Novack, Yash Belhe, Priyanka Nagasamudra, Nicholas Antipa |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Compressive Phase Retrieval under Poisson Noise
Chinmay Talegaonkar, Parthasarathi Khirwadkar, Ajit Rajwade 0001 |
ICIP | 1 |