Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neelkanth Mishra

dblp:236/6991 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 67% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › conditional independence
conditional independence testing
1.012026
Optimal Sample Complexity Lower Bounds on Conditional Independence Testing · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
property testing
1.012026
Optimal Sample Complexity Lower Bounds on Conditional Independence Testing · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
sample complexity lower bounds
1.012026
Optimal Sample Complexity Lower Bounds on Conditional Independence Testing · COLT 2026
Information theory › information measures
mutual information
1.012026
Optimal Sample Complexity Lower Bounds on Conditional Independence Testing · COLT 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample complexity analysis · 2.0KL divergence · 2.0l1-distance · 1.0l1 distance · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimal Sample Complexity Lower Bounds on Conditional Independence Testing
abstract
We study the sample complexity of conditional independence testing. In this problem, given i.i.d. samples from a discrete distribution $P_{ABC}$, the goal is to distinguish whether $A$ and $C$ are conditionally independent with respect to $B$, i.e., $P_{ABC}=P_{A|B}P_BP_{C|B}$, or whether $A$ and $C$ are conditionally dependent, $\Delta(P_{ABC},P_{A|B}P_BP_{C|B})\geq \varepsilon$ for some fixed threshold $\varepsilon$ and distance measure $\Delta$. We are interested in the cases where $\Delta$ is either the $\ell_1$ distance or the KL-divergence. The study for the case of $\ell_1$ distance was initiated by (Canonne et al., STOC 2018), and the KL-divergence was recently studied by (Seyfried et al., COLT 2025). Both works design algorithms whose sample complexities scale sublinearly in the dimensions of the subsystems, and showed tight lower bounds in some parameter regimes. While Canonne et al. derived partial lower bounds for the remaining regimes as well, the problem of fully resolving the sample complexity in all parameters remained open. In this work, we settle these open questions and prove optimal sample complexity lower bounds for both of these problems, thereby completely settling the sample complexities up to polylogarithmic factors.
Jan Seyfried, Neelkanth Mishra, Sayantan Sen, Marco Tomamichel
COLT2
2000 Conceptual description of visual scenes from linguistic models
Amitabha Mukerjee, Siddharth Nautiyal, Mukesh P. Singh, Neelkanth Mishra
Image Vis. Comput.5