Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noemi Di Nanni
dblp:237/0771
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6399-321XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
multi-omics analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
network analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
network propagation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer driver gene identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
network diffusion · 0.4multi-layer network analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | scMuffin: an R package to disentangle solid tumor heterogeneity by single-cell gene expression analysisabstractINTRODUCTION: Single-cell (SC) gene expression analysis is crucial to dissect the complex cellular heterogeneity of solid tumors, which is one of the main obstacles for the development of effective cancer treatments. Such tumors typically contain a mixture of cells with aberrant genomic and transcriptomic profiles affecting specific sub-populations that might have a pivotal role in cancer progression, whose identification eludes bulk RNA-sequencing approaches. We present scMuffin, an R package that enables the characterization of cell identity in solid tumors on the basis of a various and complementary analyses on SC gene expression data. RESULTS: scMuffin provides a series of functions to calculate qualitative and quantitative scores, such as: expression of marker sets for normal and tumor conditions, pathway activity, cell state trajectories, Copy Number Variations, transcriptional complexity and proliferation state. Thus, scMuffin facilitates the combination of various evidences that can be used to distinguish normal and tumoral cells, define cell identities, cluster cells in different ways, link genomic aberrations to phenotypes and identify subtle differences between cell subtypes or cell states. We analysed public SC expression datasets of human high-grade gliomas as a proof-of-concept to show the value of scMuffin and illustrate its user interface. Nevertheless, these analyses lead to interesting findings, which suggest that some chromosomal amplifications might underlie the invasive tumor phenotype and the presence of cells that possess tumor initiating cells characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses offered by scMuffin and the results achieved in the case study show that our tool helps addressing the main challenges in the bioinformatics analysis of SC expression data from solid tumors. Valentina Nale, Alice Chiodi, Noemi Di Nanni, Ingrid Cifola, Marco Moscatelli, Cinzia Cocola, Matteo Gnocchi, Eleonora Piscitelli, Ada Sula, Ileana Zucchi, Rolland A. Reinbold, Luciano Milanesi, Alessandra Mezzelani, Paride Pelucchi, Ettore Mosca |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2021 | Characterization and comparison of gene-centered human interactomesabstractThe complex web of macromolecular interactions occurring within cells-the interactome-is the backbone of an increasing number of studies, but a clear consensus on the exact structure of this network is still lacking. Different genome-scale maps of human interactome have been obtained through several experimental techniques and functional analyses. Moreover, these maps can be enriched through literature-mining approaches, and different combinations of various 'source' databases have been used in the literature. It is therefore unclear to which extent the various interactomes yield similar results when used in the context of interactome-based approaches in network biology. We compared a comprehensive list of human interactomes on the basis of topology, protein complexes, molecular pathways, pathway cross-talk and disease gene prediction. In a general context of relevant heterogeneity, our study provides a series of qualitative and quantitative parameters that describe the state of the art of human interactomes and guidelines for selecting interactomes in future applications. Ettore Mosca, Matteo Bersanelli, Tommaso Matteuzzi, Noemi Di Nanni, Gastone C. Castellani, Luciano Milanesi, Daniel Remondini |
Briefings Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2020 | Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networksabstractMOTIVATION: Multi-omics approaches offer the opportunity to reconstruct a more complete picture of the molecular events associated with human diseases, but pose challenges in data analysis. Network-based methods for the analysis of multi-omics leverage the complex web of macromolecular interactions occurring within cells to extract significant patterns of molecular alterations. Existing network-based approaches typically address specific combinations of omics and are limited in terms of the number of layers that can be jointly analysed. In this study, we investigate the application of network diffusion to quantify gene relevance on the basis of multiple evidences (layers). RESULTS: We introduce a gene score (mND) that quantifies the relevance of a gene in a biological process taking into account the network proximity of the gene and its first neighbours to other altered genes. We show that mND has a better performance over existing methods in finding altered genes in network proximity in one or more layers. We also report good performances in recovering known cancer genes. The pipeline described in this article is broadly applicable, because it can handle different types of inputs: in addition to multi-omics datasets, datasets that are stratified in many classes (e.g., cell clusters emerging from single cell analyses) or a combination of the two scenarios. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package 'mND' is available at URL: https://www.itb.cnr.it/mnd. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Noemi Di Nanni, Matteo Gnocchi, Marco Moscatelli, Luciano Milanesi, Ettore Mosca |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2019 | isma: an R package for the integrative analysis of mutations detected by multiple pipelinesabstractBACKGROUND: Recent comparative studies have brought to our attention how somatic mutation detection from next-generation sequencing data is still an open issue in bioinformatics, because different pipelines result in a low consensus. In this context, it is suggested to integrate results from multiple calling tools, but this operation is not trivial and the burden of merging, comparing, filtering and explaining the results demands appropriate software. RESULTS: We developed isma (integrative somatic mutation analysis), an R package for the integrative analysis of somatic mutations detected by multiple pipelines for matched tumor-normal samples. The package provides a series of functions to quantify the consensus, estimate the variability, underline outliers, integrate evidences from publicly available mutation catalogues and filter sites. We illustrate the capabilities of isma analysing breast cancer somatic mutations generated by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) using four pipelines. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing different "points of view" on the same data, isma generates a unique mutation catalogue and a series of reports that underline common patterns, variability, as well as sites already catalogued by other studies (e.g. TCGA), so as to design and apply filtering strategies to screen more reliable sites. The package is available for non-commercial users at the URL https://www.itb.cnr.it/isma . Noemi Di Nanni, Marco Moscatelli, Matteo Gnocchi, Luciano Milanesi, Ettore Mosca |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |