Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Howard Heaton

dblp:237/5344 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5560-750XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 75% Deep learning architectures and training · 25%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer
1.732023
Safeguarded Learned Convex Optimization · AAAI 2023
Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Learning A Minimax Optimizer: A Pilot Study · ICLR 2021
Mathematical optimization
learning to optimize
1.222023
Safeguarded Learned Convex Optimization · AAAI 2023
Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Mathematical optimization
smoothing
0.912025
Laplace Meets Moreau: Smooth Approximation to Infimal Convolutions Using Laplace's Method · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep generative model
implicit models
0.612022
JFB: Jacobian-Free Backpropagation for Implicit Networks · AAAI 2022
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.612022
Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

safeguard · 1.3proximal gradient · 1.3convex optimization · 1.3machine learning · 1.1benchmarking · 1.1proximal algorithm · 0.9laplace's method · 0.9implicit function theorem · 0.6fixed-point iteration · 0.6minimax optimization · 0.5meta-learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Laplace Meets Moreau: Smooth Approximation to Infimal Convolutions Using Laplace's Method
abstract
We study approximations to the Moreau envelope---and infimal convolutions more broadly---based on Laplace's method, a classical tool in analysis which ties certain integrals to suprema of their integrands. We believe the connection between Laplace's method and infimal convolutions is generally deserving of more attention in the study of optimization and partial differential equations, since it bears numerous potentially important applications, from proximal-type algorithms to Hamilton-Jacobi equations.
Ryan J. Tibshirani, Samy Wu Fung, Howard Heaton, Stanley J. Osher
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2023 Safeguarded Learned Convex Optimization
abstract
Applications abound in which optimization problems must be repeatedly solved, each time with new (but similar) data. Analytic optimization algorithms can be hand-designed to provably solve these problems in an iterative fashion. On one hand, data-driven algorithms can "learn to optimize" (L2O) with much fewer iterations and similar cost per iteration as general-purpose optimization algorithms. On the other hand, unfortunately, many L2O algorithms lack converge guarantees. To fuse the advantages of these approaches, we present a Safe-L2O framework. Safe-L2O updates incorporate a safeguard to guarantee convergence for convex problems with proximal and/or gradient oracles. The safeguard is simple and computationally cheap to implement, and it is activated only when the data-driven L2O updates would perform poorly or appear to diverge. This yields the numerical benefits of employing machine learning to create rapid L2O algorithms while still guaranteeing convergence. Our numerical examples show convergence of Safe-L2O algorithms, even when the provided data is not from the distribution of training data.
Howard Heaton, Xiaohan Chen 0001, Zhangyang Wang, Wotao Yin
AAAI1
2022 JFB: Jacobian-Free Backpropagation for Implicit Networks
abstract
A promising trend in deep learning replaces traditional feedforward networks with implicit networks. Unlike traditional networks, implicit networks solve a fixed point equation to compute inferences. Solving for the fixed point varies in complexity, depending on provided data and an error tolerance. Importantly, implicit networks may be trained with fixed memory costs in stark contrast to feedforward networks, whose memory requirements scale linearly with depth. However, there is no free lunch --- backpropagation through implicit networks often requires solving a costly Jacobian-based equation arising from the implicit function theorem. We propose Jacobian-Free Backpropagation (JFB), a fixed-memory approach that circumvents the need to solve Jacobian-based equations. JFB makes implicit networks faster to train and significantly easier to implement, without sacrificing test accuracy. Our experiments show implicit networks trained with JFB are competitive with feedforward networks and prior implicit networks given the same number of parameters.
Samy Wu Fung, Howard Heaton, Qiuwei Li, Daniel McKenzie, Stanley J. Osher, Wotao Yin
AAAI2
2022 Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark
abstract
Learning to optimize (L2O) is an emerging approach that leverages machine learning to develop optimization methods, aiming at reducing the laborious iterations of hand engineering. It automates the design of an optimization method based on its performance on a set of training problems. This data-driven procedure generates methods that can efficiently solve problems similar to those in training. In sharp contrast, the typical and traditional designs of optimization methods are theory-driven, so they obtain performance guarantees over the classes of problems specified by the theory. The difference makes L2O suitable for repeatedly solving a particular optimization problem over a specific distribution of data, while it typically fails on out-of-distribution problems. The practicality of L2O depends on the type of target optimization, the chosen architecture of the method to learn, and the training procedure. This new paradigm has motivated a community of researchers to explore L2O and report their findings. This article is poised to be the first comprehensive survey and benchmark of L2O for continuous optimization. We set up taxonomies, categorize existing works and research directions, present insights, and identify open challenges. We benchmarked many existing L2O approaches on a few representative optimization problems. For reproducible research and fair benchmarking purposes, we released our software implementation and data in the package Open-L2O at https://github.com/VITA-Group/Open-L2O.
Tianlong Chen 0001, Xiaohan Chen 0001, Wuyang Chen 0001, Howard Heaton, Jialin Liu 0003, Zhangyang Wang, Wotao Yin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2021 Learning A Minimax Optimizer: A Pilot Study
Xiaohan Chen 0001, Howard Heaton, Tianlong Chen 0001, Jialin Liu 0003, Wotao Yin, Zhangyang Wang
ICLR3
2019 Asynchronous sequential inertial iterations for common fixed points problems with an application to linear systems
Howard Heaton, Yair Censor
J. Glob. Optim.1