Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul Muentener

dblp:237/8650 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 56% Human-AI interaction · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › virtual agents
human-like agents
0.412019
Children's Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley · HRI 2019
Human-robot interaction › anthropomorphism
uncanny valley
0.412019
Children's Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley · HRI 2019
Human-robot interaction
child-robot interaction
0.112019
Children's Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley · HRI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Children's Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley
abstract
Both perceptual mechanisms (e.g., threat detection/avoidance) and social mechanisms (e.g., fears fostered via negative media) may explain the existence of the uncanny valley; however, existing literature lacks sufficient evidence to decide whether one, the other, or a combination best accounts for the valley's effects. As perceptually oriented explanations imply the valley should be evident early in development, we investigated whether it presents in the responding of children ( N=80; ages 5-10) to agents of varying human similarity. We found that, like adults, children were most averse to highly humanlike robots (relative to less humanlike robots and humans). But, unlike adults, children's aversion did not translate to avoidance. The findings thus indicate, consistent with perceptual explanations, that the valley effect manifests well before adulthood. However, further research is needed to understand the emergence of the valley's behavioral consequences.
Megan K. Strait, Heather L. Urry, Paul Muentener
HRI3