EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ben Lonnqvist
dblp:237/9526
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0538-7526ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 41% Segmentation and scene understanding · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contour Integration Underlies Human-Like Vision · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape bias |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contour Integration Underlies Human-Like Vision · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
perceptual grouping |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Latent Noise Segmentation: How Neural Noise Leads to the Emergence of Segmentation and Grouping · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
unsupervised segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Latent Noise Segmentation: How Neural Noise Leads to the Emergence of Segmentation and Grouping · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Latent Noise Segmentation: How Neural Noise Leads to the Emergence of Segmentation and Grouping · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model benchmarking · 0.9controlled psychophysics experiments · 0.9neural noise injection · 0.8deep neural network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Contour Integration Underlies Human-Like VisionabstractDespite the tremendous success of deep learning in computer vision, models still fall behind humans in generalizing to new input distributions. Existing benchmarks do not investigate the specific failure points of models by analyzing performance under many controlled conditions. Our study systematically dissects where and why models struggle with contour integration - a hallmark of human vision – by designing an experiment that tests object recognition under various levels of object fragmentation. Humans (n=50) perform at high accuracy, even with few object contours present. This is in contrast to models which exhibit substantially lower sensitivity to increasing object contours, with most of the over 1,000 models we tested barely performing above chance. Only at very large scales ($\sim5B$ training dataset size) do models begin to approach human performance. Importantly, humans exhibit an integration bias - a preference towards recognizing objects made up of directional fragments over directionless fragments. We find that not only do models that share this property perform better at our task, but that this bias also increases with model training dataset size, and training models to exhibit contour integration leads to high shape bias. Taken together, our results suggest that contour integration is a hallmark of object vision that underlies object recognition performance, and may be a mechanism learned from data at scale. Ben Lonnqvist, Elsa Scialom, Abdülkadir Gökce, Zehra Merchant, Michael H. Herzog, Martin Schrimpf |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Latent Noise Segmentation: How Neural Noise Leads to the Emergence of Segmentation and GroupingabstractHumans are able to segment images effortlessly without supervision using perceptual grouping. Here, we propose a counter-intuitive computational approach to solving unsupervised perceptual grouping and segmentation: that they arise *because* of neural noise, rather than in spite of it. We (1) mathematically demonstrate that under realistic assumptions, neural noise can be used to separate objects from each other; (2) that adding noise in a DNN enables the network to segment images even though it was never trained on any segmentation labels; and (3) that segmenting objects using noise results in segmentation performance that aligns with the perceptual grouping phenomena observed in humans, and is sample-efficient. We introduce the Good Gestalt (GG) datasets --- six datasets designed to specifically test perceptual grouping, and show that our DNN models reproduce many important phenomena in human perception, such as illusory contours, closure, continuity, proximity, and occlusion. Finally, we (4) show that our model improves performance on our GG datasets compared to other tested unsupervised models by $24.9$%. Together, our results suggest a novel unsupervised segmentation method requiring few assumptions, a new explanation for the formation of perceptual grouping, and a novel potential benefit of neural noise. Ben Lonnqvist, Frank Zhengqing Wu, Michael H. Herzog |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Crowding in humans is unlike that in convolutional neural networks
Ben Lonnqvist, Alasdair D. F. Clarke, Ramakrishna Chakravarthi |
Neural Networks | 1 |