Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mien Brabeeba Wang

dblp:237/9603 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Learning theory · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.412020
ODE-Inspired Analysis for the Biological Version of Oja's Rule in Solving Streaming PCA · COLT 2020
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
0.412020
ODE-Inspired Analysis for the Biological Version of Oja's Rule in Solving Streaming PCA · COLT 2020
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
streaming PCA
0.412020
ODE-Inspired Analysis for the Biological Version of Oja's Rule in Solving Streaming PCA · COLT 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stopping time · 0.9ordinary differential equation analysis · 0.9martingale · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 ODE-Inspired Analysis for the Biological Version of Oja's Rule in Solving Streaming PCA
abstract
Oja’s rule [Oja, Journal of mathematical biology 1982] is a well-known biologically-plausible algorithm using a Hebbian-type synaptic update rule to solve streaming principal component analysis (PCA). Computational neuroscientists have known that this biological version of Oja’s rule converges to the top eigenvector of the covariance matrix of the input in the limit. However, prior to this work, it was open to prove any convergence rate guarantee. In this work, we give the first convergence rate analysis for the biological version of Oja’s rule in solving streaming PCA. Moreover, our convergence rate matches the information theoretical lower bound up to logarithmic factors and outperforms the state-of-the-art upper bound for streaming PCA. Furthermore, we develop a novel framework inspired by ordinary differential equations (ODE) to analyze general stochastic dynamics. The framework abandons the traditional \textit{step-by-step} analysis and instead analyzes a stochastic dynamic in \textit{one-shot} by giving a closed-form solution to the entire dynamic. The one-shot framework allows us to apply stopping time and martingale techniques to have a flexible and precise control on the dynamic. We believe that this general framework is powerful and should lead to effective yet simple analysis for a large class of problems with stochastic dynamics.
Chi-Ning Chou, Mien Brabeeba Wang
COLT2
2019 Brief Announcement: Integrating Temporal Information to Spatial Information in a Neural Circuit
abstract
In this paper, we consider networks of deterministic spiking neurons, firing synchronously at discrete times. We consider the problem of translating temporal information into spatial information in such networks, an important task that is carried out by actual brains. Specifically, we define two problems: "First Consecutive Spikes Counting" and "Total Spikes Counting", which model temporal-coding and rate-coding aspects of temporal-to-spatial translation respectively. Assuming an upper bound of T on the length of the temporal input signal, we design two networks that solve two problems, each using O(log T) neurons and terminating in time T+1. We also prove that these bounds are tight.
Nancy A. Lynch, Mien Brabeeba Wang
DISC2