Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Konrad Czechowski

dblp:237/9612 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% Reinforcement learning · 37% Language models and text generation · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.712023
Fast and Precise: Adjusting Planning Horizon with Adaptive Subgoal Search · ICLR 2023
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated theorem proving
premise selection
0.612022
Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Provers · NeurIPS 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving
0.612022
Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Provers · NeurIPS 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
best-first search
0.512021
Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical search
0.512021
Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning › option discovery
subgoal discovery
0.512021
Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › hierarchical planning
subgoal planning
0.512021
Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.412020
Model Based Reinforcement Learning for Atari · ICLR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

language model · 1.1hammers · 1.1automated theorem prover · 1.1subgoal search · 0.7adaptive planning · 0.7transformer-based subgoal generation · 0.5best-first search · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Fast and Precise: Adjusting Planning Horizon with Adaptive Subgoal Search
Michal Zawalski, Michal Tyrolski, Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Damian Stachura, Piotr Piekos, Yuhuai Wu, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos
ICLR3
2022 Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Provers
abstract
In theorem proving, the task of selecting useful premises from a large library to unlock the proof of a given conjecture is crucially important. This presents a challenge for all theorem provers, especially the ones based on language models, due to their relative inability to reason over huge volumes of premises in text form. This paper introduces Thor, a framework integrating language models and automated theorem provers to overcome this difficulty. In Thor, a class of methods called hammers that leverage the power of automated theorem provers are used for premise selection, while all other tasks are designated to language models. Thor increases a language model's success rate on the PISA dataset from $39\%$ to $57\%$, while solving $8.2\%$ of problems neither language models nor automated theorem provers are able to solve on their own. Furthermore, with a significantly smaller computational budget, Thor can achieve a success rate on the MiniF2F dataset that is on par with the best existing methods. Thor can be instantiated for the majority of popular interactive theorem provers via a straightforward protocol we provide.
Albert Q. Jiang, Szymon Tworkowski, Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Piotr Milos, Yuhuai Wu, Mateja Jamnik
NeurIPS4
2021 Structure and Randomness in Planning and Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Planning in large state spaces inevitably needs to balance the depth and breadth of the search. It has a crucial impact on the performance of a planner and most manage this interplay implicitly. We present a novel method Shoot Tree Search (STS), which makes it possible to control this trade-off more explicitly. Our algorithm can be understood as an interpolation between two celebrated search mechanisms: MCTS and random shooting. It also lets the user control the bias-variance trade-off, akin to TD(n), but in the tree search context. In experiments on challenging domains, we show that STS can get the best of both worlds consistently achieving higher scores.
Konrad Czechowski, Piotr Januszewski, Piotr Kozakowski, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos
IJCNN1
2021 Trust, but Verify: Alleviating Pessimistic Errors in Model-Based Exploration
Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Michal Izworski, Marek Zbysinski, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos
IJCNN1
2021 Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks
abstract
Humans excel in solving complex reasoning tasks through a mental process of moving from one idea to a related one. Inspired by this, we propose Subgoal Search (kSubS) method. Its key component is a learned subgoal generator that produces a diversity of subgoals that are both achievable and closer to the solution. Using subgoals reduces the search space and induces a high-level search graph suitable for efficient planning. In this paper, we implement kSubS using a transformer-based subgoal module coupled with the classical best-first search framework. We show that a simple approach of generating $k$-th step ahead subgoals is surprisingly efficient on three challenging domains: two popular puzzle games, Sokoban and the Rubik's Cube, and an inequality proving benchmark INT. kSubS achieves strong results including state-of-the-art on INT within a modest computational budget.
Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzygózdz, Marek Zbysinski, Michal Zawalski, Krzysztof Olejnik, Yuhuai Wu, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos
NeurIPS1
2020 Model Based Reinforcement Learning for Atari
Lukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski, Roy H. Campbell, Konrad Czechowski, Dumitru Erhan, Chelsea Finn, Piotr Kozakowski, Sergey Levine, Afroz Mohiuddin, Ryan Sepassi, George Tucker, Henryk Michalewski
ICLR6