Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sharon Qian
dblp:237/9875
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 70% Computational complexity · 12% Algorithms and data structures · 10% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 80% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Instance Specific Approximations for Submodular Maximization · ICML 2021 The Adaptive Complexity of Maximizing a Gross Substitutes Valuation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
cardinality-constrained submodular maximization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Instance Specific Approximations for Submodular Maximization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › gender bias
gender bias in language models |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
mediation analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes › approximation classes › optimization complexity
adaptive complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Adaptive Complexity of Maximizing a Gross Substitutes Valuation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures
parallel algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fast Parallel Algorithms for Statistical Subset Selection Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fast Parallel Algorithms for Statistical Subset Selection Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
weakly submodular maximization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fast Parallel Algorithms for Statistical Subset Selection Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Instance Specific Approximations for Submodular Maximization · ICML 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
approximation guarantees |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Instance Specific Approximations for Submodular Maximization · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › matroid constraint
cardinality constraint |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Adaptive Complexity of Maximizing a Gross Substitutes Valuation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Adaptive Complexity of Maximizing a Gross Substitutes Valuation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Fast Parallel Algorithms for Statistical Subset Selection Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
experimental design |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Fast Parallel Algorithms for Statistical Subset Selection Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
greedy algorithm · 1.3differential submodularity · 0.8adaptive sampling · 0.8dual approach · 0.5neuron analysis · 0.4lower bound proof · 0.4causal mediation analysis · 0.4attention head analysis · 0.4adaptive rounds analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Instance Specific Approximations for Submodular MaximizationabstractThe predominant measure for the performance of an algorithm is its worst-case approximation guarantee. While worst-case approximations give desirable robustness guarantees, they can differ significantly from the performance of an algorithm in practice. For the problem of monotone submodular maximization under a cardinality constraint, the greedy algorithm is known to obtain a 1-1/e approximation guarantee, which is optimal for a polynomial-time algorithm. However, very little is known about the approximation achieved by greedy and other submodular maximization algorithms on real instances. We develop an algorithm that gives an instance-specific approximation for any solution of an instance of monotone submodular maximization under a cardinality constraint. This algorithm uses a novel dual approach to submodular maximization. In particular, it relies on the construction of a lower bound to the dual objective that can also be exactly minimized. We use this algorithm to show that on a wide variety of real-world datasets and objectives, greedy and other algorithms find solutions that approximate the optimal solution significantly better than the 1-1/e 0.63 worst-case approximation guarantee, often exceeding 0.9. Eric Balkanski, Sharon Qian, Yaron Singer |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | The Adaptive Complexity of Maximizing a Gross Substitutes ValuationabstractIn this paper, we study the adaptive complexity of maximizing a monotone gross substitutes function under a cardinality constraint. Our main result is an algorithm that achieves a 1-epsilon approximation in O(log n) adaptive rounds for any constant epsilon > 0, which is an exponential speedup in parallel running time compared to previously studied algorithms for gross substitutes functions. We show that the algorithmic results are tight in the sense that there is no algorithm that obtains a constant factor approximation in o(log n) rounds. Both the upper and lower bounds are under the assumption that queries are only on feasible sets (i.e., of size at most k). We also show that under a stronger model, where non-feasible queries are allowed, there is no non-adaptive algorithm that obtains an approximation better than 1/2 + epsilon. Both lower bounds extend to the class of OXS functions. Additionally, we conduct experiments on synthetic and real data sets to demonstrate the near-optimal performance and efficiency of the algorithm in practice. Ron Kupfer, Sharon Qian, Eric Balkanski, Yaron Singer |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation AnalysisabstractMany interpretation methods for neural models in natural language processing investigate how information is encoded inside hidden representations. However, these methods can only measure whether the information exists, not whether it is actually used by the model. We propose a methodology grounded in the theory of causal mediation analysis for interpreting which parts of a model are causally implicated in its behavior. The approach enables us to analyze the mechanisms that facilitate the flow of information from input to output through various model components, known as mediators. As a case study, we apply this methodology to analyzing gender bias in pre-trained Transformer language models. We study the role of individual neurons and attention heads in mediating gender bias across three datasets designed to gauge a model's sensitivity to gender bias. Our mediation analysis reveals that gender bias effects are concentrated in specific components of the model that may exhibit highly specialized behavior. Jesse Vig, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yonatan Belinkov, Sharon Qian, Daniel Nevo, Yaron Singer, Stuart M. Shieber |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2019 | Fast Parallel Algorithms for Statistical Subset Selection ProblemsabstractIn this paper, we propose a new framework for designing fast parallel algorithms for fundamental statistical subset selection tasks that include feature selection and experimental design. Such tasks are known to be weakly submodular and are amenable to optimization via the standard greedy algorithm. Despite its desirable approximation guarantees, however, the greedy algorithm is inherently sequential and in the worst case, its parallel runtime is linear in the size of the data. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in a parallel optimization technique called adaptive sampling which produces solutions with desirable approximation guarantees for submodular maximization in exponentially faster parallel runtime. Unfortunately, we show that for general weakly submodular functions such accelerations are impossible. The major contribution in this paper is a novel relaxation of submodularity which we call differential submodularity. We first prove that differential submodularity characterizes objectives like feature selection and experimental design. We then design an adaptive sampling algorithm for differentially submodular functions whose parallel runtime is logarithmic in the size of the data and achieves strong approximation guarantees. Through experiments, we show the algorithm's performance is competitive with state-of-the-art methods and obtains dramatic speedups for feature selection and experimental design problems. Sharon Qian, Yaron Singer |
NeurIPS | 1 |