Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sandesh Adhikary
dblp:237/9941
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 35% Motion planning and robot control · 5% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning › visual reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from pixels |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BeigeMaps: Behavioral Eigenmaps for Reinforcement Learning from Images · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
representation learning for reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BeigeMaps: Behavioral Eigenmaps for Reinforcement Learning from Images · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
state representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BeigeMaps: Behavioral Eigenmaps for Reinforcement Learning from Images · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
approximate bayesian computation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sampling Over Riemannian Manifolds Using Kernel Herding · ICRA 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sampling Over Riemannian Manifolds Using Kernel Herding · ICRA 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle filtering |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sampling Over Riemannian Manifolds Using Kernel Herding · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot state estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sampling Over Riemannian Manifolds Using Kernel Herding · ICRA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
similarity kernel · 0.8eigenfunctions · 0.8bisimulation metric · 0.8riemannian optimization · 0.6kernel herding · 0.6geometry-aware kernels · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BeigeMaps: Behavioral Eigenmaps for Reinforcement Learning from ImagesabstractTraining reinforcement learning (RL) agents directly from high-dimensional image observations continues to be a challenging problem. Recent line of work on behavioral distances proposes to learn representations that encode behavioral similarities quantified by the bisimulation metric. By learning an isometric mapping to a lower dimensional space that preserves this metric, such methods attempt to learn representations that group together functionally similar states. However, such an isometric mapping may not exist, making the learning objective ill-defined. We propose an alternative objective that allows distortions in long-range distances, while preserving local metric structure – inducing representations that highlight natural clusters in the state space. This leads to new representations, which we term Behavioral Eigenmaps (BeigeMaps), corresponding to the eigenfunctions of similarity kernels induced by behavioral distances. We empirically demonstrate that when added as a drop-in modification, BeigeMaps improve the policy performance of prior behavioral distance based RL algorithms. Sandesh Adhikary, Anqi Li 0001, Byron Boots |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Sampling Over Riemannian Manifolds Using Kernel HerdingabstractKernel herding is a deterministic sampling algorithm designed to draw ‘super samples' from probability distributions when provided with their kernel mean embeddings in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). Empirical expectations of functions in the RKHS formed using these super samples tend to converge even faster than random sampling from the true distribution itself. Standard implementations of kernel herding have been restricted to sampling over flat Euclidean spaces, which is not ideal for applications such as robotics where more general Riemannian manifolds may be appropriate. We propose to adapt kernel herding to Riemannian manifolds by (1) using geometry-aware kernels that incorporate the appropriate distance metric for the manifold and (2) using Riemannian optimization to constrain herded samples to lie on the manifold. We evaluate our approach on problems involving various manifolds commonly used in robotics including the SO(3) manifold of rotation matrices, the spherical manifold used to encode unit quaternions, and the manifold of symmetric positive definite matrices. We demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing alternatives on the task of resampling from empirical distributions of weighted particles, a problem encountered in applications such as particle filtering. We also demonstrate how Riemannian kernel herding can be used as part of the kernel recursive approximate Bayesian computation algorithm to estimate parameters of black-box simulators, including inertia matrices of an Adroit robot hand simulator. Our results confirm that exploiting geometric information through our approach to kernel herding yields better results than alternatives including standard kernel herding with heuristic projections. Sandesh Adhikary, Byron Boots |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2021 | Quantum Tensor Networks, Stochastic Processes, and Weighted AutomataabstractModeling joint probability distributions over sequences has been studied from many perspectives. The physics community developed matrix product states, a tensor-train decomposition for probabilistic modeling, motivated by the need to tractably model many-body systems. But similar models have also been studied in the stochastic processes and weighted automata literature, with little work on how these bodies of work relate to each other. We address this gap by showing how stationary or uniform versions of popular quantum tensor network models have equivalent representations in the stochastic processes and weighted automata literature, in the limit of infinitely long sequences. We demonstrate several equivalence results between models used in these three communities: (i) uniform variants of matrix product states, Born machines and locally purified states from the quantum tensor networks literature, (ii) predictive state representations, hidden Markov models, norm-observable operator models and hidden quantum Markov models from the stochastic process literature, and (iii) stochastic weighted automata, probabilistic automata and quadratic automata from the formal languages literature. Such connections may open the door for results and methods developed in one area to be applied in another. Sandesh Adhikary, Siddarth Srinivasan, Jacob Miller 0003, Guillaume Rabusseau, Byron Boots |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2020 | Expressiveness and Learning of Hidden Quantum Markov ModelsabstractExtending classical probabilistic reasoning using the quantum mechanical view of probability has been of recent interest, particularly in the development of hidden quantum Markov models (HQMMs) to model stochastic processes. However, there has been little progress in characterizing the expressiveness of such models and learning them from data. We tackle these problems by showing that HQMMs are a special subclass of the general class of observable operator models (OOMs) that do not suffer from the negative probability problem by design. We also provide a feasible retraction-based learning algorithm for HQMMs using constrained gradient descent on the Stiefel manifold of model parameters. We demonstrate that this approach is faster and scales to larger models than previous learning algorithms. Sandesh Adhikary, Siddarth Srinivasan, Geoffrey J. Gordon, Byron Boots |
AISTATS | 1 |