Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Krishnkant Swarnkar

dblp:238/1569 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
community question answering
0.412019
Improved Cross-Lingual Question Retrieval for Community Question Answering · WWW 2019
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval
0.412019
Improved Cross-Lingual Question Retrieval for Community Question Answering · WWW 2019
Information retrieval › question answering
question retrieval
0.412019
Improved Cross-Lingual Question Retrieval for Community Question Answering · WWW 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural question retrieval · 0.8neural machine translation · 0.8backtranslation · 0.4back-translation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Improved Cross-Lingual Question Retrieval for Community Question Answering
abstract
We perform cross-lingual question retrieval in community question answering (cQA), i.e., we retrieve similar questions for queries that are given in another language. The standard approach to cross-lingual information retrieval, which is to automatically translate the query to the target language and continue with a monolingual retrieval model, typically falls short in cQA due to translation errors. This is even more the case for specialized domains such as in technical cQA, which we explore in this work. To remedy, we propose two extensions to this approach that improve cross-lingual question retrieval: (1) we enhance an NMT model with monolingual cQA data to improve the translation quality, and (2) we improve the robustness of a state-of-the-art neural question retrieval model to common translation errors by adding back-translations during training. Our results show that we achieve substantial improvements over the baseline approach and considerably close the gap to a setup where we have access to an external commercial machine translation service (i.e., Google Translate), which is often not the case in many practical scenarios. Our source code and data is publicly available.1
Andreas Rücklé, Krishnkant Swarnkar, Iryna Gurevych
WWW2