Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark He

dblp:238/1611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9752-1256ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › quantitative trait locus mapping
expression quantitative trait loci analysis
0.712023
Finding Groups of Cross-Correlated Features in Bi-View Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.712023
Finding Groups of Cross-Correlated Features in Bi-View Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative testing · 1.3bimodule search procedure · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Finding Groups of Cross-Correlated Features in Bi-View Data
abstract
Datasets in which measurements of two (or more) types are obtained from a common set of samples arise in many scientific applications. A common problem in the exploratory analysis of such data is to identify groups of features of different data types that are strongly associated. A bimodule is a pair (A,B) of feature sets from two data types such that the aggregate cross-correlation between the features in A and those in B is large. A bimodule (A,B) is stable if A coincides with the set of features that have significant aggregate correlation with the features in B, and vice-versa. This paper proposes an iterative-testing based bimodule search procedure (BSP) to identify stable bimodules. Compared to existing methods for detecting cross-correlated features, BSP was the best at recovering true bimodules with sufficient signal, while limiting the false discoveries. In addition, we applied BSP to the problem of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis using data from the GTEx consortium. BSP identified several thousand SNP-gene bimodules. While many of the individual SNP-gene pairs appearing in the discovered bimodules were identified by standard eQTL methods, the discovered bimodules revealed genomic subnetworks that appeared to be biologically meaningful and worthy of further scientific investigation.
Miheer Dewaskar, John Palowitch, Mark He, Michael I. Love, Andrew B. Nobel
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2019 Scan-Time Corrections for 80-100-min Standardizetd Uptake Volume Ratios to Measure the 18F-AV-1451 Tracer for Tau Imaging
abstract
The18F-AV-1451 PET tracer binds to tau, an Alzheimer's disease biomarker. The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) 80-100 min window is widely used to quantify tau binding, although18F-AV-1451 continues increasing relative to a reference region in regions with tau deposition. Left uncorrected, acquisition time inaccuracies can lead to errors from -4% to 6% in 20-min SUVR measurements in subjects with Alzheimer's disease. In 40 subjects with scans from 75-115 min following18F-AV-1451 injection, we created 20-min reconstructions (4×5 min) of start-times ranging from 75-85 min, as proxies of offset scans and calculated the mean in regions of interest (ROIs). We developed a segmented least squares (SLS) method to obtain error-minimizing weighting coefficients for18F-AV-1451 ROIs that best predict SUVR 80-100 from weighted means of SUVRs from offset start-times. We compared residual errors of our SLS method to those in: 1) uncorrected offset 20-min-SUVRs; 2) the mean of five-min frames within the 80-100 window; and 3) a least-squares interpolation method. We evaluated errors induced by start-time offset on SUVRs for each method. TheSLS, which corrected using least-squares coefficients of 5-min components, consistently reduced errors across all offset starttimes. Effect size analysis for simulated clinical longitudinal18F-AV-1451 drug trials showed that uncorrected 20-min offset SUVRs would require up to 20% more participants to detect treatment effects compared with using SLS. Correction of SUVR scan-time errors by SLS minimizes errors compared with other correction methods and may be extended to other scanners and tracers.
Mark He, Suzanne L. Baker, Vyoma D. Shah, Samuel N. Lockhart, William J. Jagust
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging1