Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Masafumi Yamazaki
dblp:238/1644
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 77% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 23% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
batch normalization adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Efficient Technique for Large Mini-batch Challenge of DNNs Training on Large Scale Cluster · HPDC 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning › scalable training
large mini-batch training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Efficient Technique for Large Mini-batch Challenge of DNNs Training on Large Scale Cluster · HPDC 2020 |
Parallel and multicore computing
distributed deep learning training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Efficient Technique for Large Mini-batch Challenge of DNNs Training on Large Scale Cluster · HPDC 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hyperparameter tuning · 0.9final polishing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Performance Analysis of Quantum Computer Simulators Across Different EnvironmentsabstractQuantum computers can achieve extremely fast computations for certain problems using quantum properties. Due to these factors, research and development in the field of quantum computers have been vigorously pursued. It is crucial to develop a quantum computer that operates accurately and, concurrently, create applications compatible with quantum computing. Quantum computer simulators are tools that represent the behavior of a quantum computer on classical computers, and they are highly conducive to the development of quantum applications that can run on actual quantum computers. On the other hand, quantum computer simulators run on classical computers, which are extremely slow compared to quantum computers. Therefore, it is desirable for the development of quantum applications to be able to fully utilize the computational resources on a classical computer and run at high speed. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the Qiskit Aer simulator, the Qulacs simulator, and mpiQulacs on various types of single servers. We then compare the performance of these quantum computer simulators across different computer environments. Nozomi Aoki, Masafumi Yamazaki, Akira Hirai, Mari Yamaoka, Naoto Fukumoto, Akihiko Kasagi, Masato Oguchi |
SERA | 2 |
| 2021 | The 16, 384-node Parallelism of 3D-CNN Training on An Arm CPU based SupercomputerabstractAs the computational cost and datasets available for deep neural network training continue to increase, there is a significant demand for fast distributed training on supercomputers. However, porting and tuning applications for new advanced supercomputers requires tremendous amount of development efforts. Therefore, we present software tuning best practice for a 3D-CNN model training on a new Arm CPU based supercomputer, Fugaku. We (i) tune computation in DL by a JIT translator for aarch64, (ii) optimize collective communication such as Allreduce for 6D mesh/torus network topology, (iii) tune I/O by data staging with compression and data loader with caching, and (iv) parallelize training in data and model parallelism. We apply the proposed methods to a CosmoFlow 3D-CNN model, and achieve the training in 30 minutes using 16,384 nodes consisting of 4096 data- and 4 model-parallelism. This is the fastest result of any CPU-based systems in MLPerf HPC v0.7 in the world. Akihiro Tabuchi, Koichi Shirahata, Masafumi Yamazaki, Akihiko Kasagi, Takumi Honda, Kouji Kurihara, Kentaro Kawakami, Tsuguchika Tabaru, Naoto Fukumoto, Akiyoshi Kuroda, Takaaki Fukai, Kento Sato |
HiPC | 3 |
| 2020 | An Efficient Technique for Large Mini-batch Challenge of DNNs Training on Large Scale ClusterabstractDistributed deep learning using large mini-batches is a key strategy to perform the deep learning as fast as possible, but it represents a great challenge as it is difficult to achieve high scaling efficiency when using large clusters without compromising accuracy. The particular problem in this challenge is decreasing the number of model update iterations in whole of training. Thus, we need a technique which can converge the validation accuracy with a small number of iterations to address this challenge. In this paper, we introduce a novel technique, Final Polishing. This technique adjusts the means and variances in the batch normalization and mitigates the difference of normalization between validation datasets and augmented training datasets. By applying the technique, we achieved top-1 validation accuracy of 75.08% with mini-batch size of 81,920, with 2,048 GPUs and completed the training of ResNet-50 in 74.7 seconds.In addition, targeting top-1 validation accuracy of 75.9% or more, we tried additional parameters tuning. Then, we adjusted the number of GPUs and hyperparameters of DNNs with Final Polishing, and we also achieved top-1 validation accuracy of 75.97% with mini-batch size of 86,016, with 3,072 GPUs and completed the training of ResNet-50 in 62.1 seconds. Akihiko Kasagi, Akihiro Tabuchi, Masafumi Yamazaki, Takumi Honda, Masahiro Miwa, Naoto Fukumoto, Tsuguchika Tabaru, Atsushi Ike, Kohta Nakashima |
HPDC | 3 |