Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cuong Tran 0006
dblp:238/5457
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › attack resilience
attack mitigation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Assessing and Mitigating Impact of Time Delay Attack: Case Studies for Power Grid Controls · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020 |
Energy systems and smart grids
power system control |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Assessing and Mitigating Impact of Time Delay Attack: Case Studies for Power Grid Controls · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability-safety analysis · 0.9machine learning classification · 0.9PID control tuning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Assessing and Mitigating Impact of Time Delay Attack: Case Studies for Power Grid ControlsabstractDue to recent cyber attacks on various cyber-physical systems (CPSes), traditional isolation based security schemes in the critical systems are insufficient to deal with the smart adversaries in CPSes with advanced information and communication technologies (ICTs). In this paper, we develop real-time assessment and mitigation of an attack's impact as a system's built-in mechanisms. We study a general class of attacks, which we call time delay attack, that delays the transmissions of control data packets in the CPS control loops. Based on a joint stability-safety criterion, we propose the attack impact assessment consisting of (i) a machine learning (ML) based safety classification, and (ii) a tandem stability-safety classification that exploits a basic relationship between stability and safety, namely that an unstable system must be unsafe whereas a stable system may not be safe. In this assessment approach, the ML addresses a state explosion problem in the safety classification, whereas the tandem structure reduces false negatives in detecting unsafety arising from imperfect ML. We apply our approach to assess the impact of the attack on power grid automatic generation control, and accordingly develop a two-tiered mitigation that tunes the control gain automatically to restore safety where necessary and shed load only if the tuning is insufficient. We also apply our attack impact assessment approach to a thermal power plant control system consisting of two PID control loops. A mitigation approach by tuning the PID controller is also proposed. Extensive simulations based on a 37-bus system model and a thermal power plant control system are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of our assessment and mitigation approaches. Xin Lou 0005, Cuong Tran 0006, Rui Tan 0001, David K. Y. Yau, Zbigniew T. Kalbarczyk, Ambarish Kumar Banerjee, Prakhar Ganesh |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 2 |