EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gösta Stomberg
dblp:238/5481
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cooperative Distributed Model Predictive Control for Embedded Systems: Experiments with Hovercraft Formations · ICRA 2025 |
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded system design
embedded implementation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Cooperative Distributed Model Predictive Control for Embedded Systems: Experiments with Hovercraft Formations · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model predictive control · 0.9decentralized optimization · 0.9alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Cooperative Distributed Model Predictive Control for Embedded Systems: Experiments with Hovercraft FormationsabstractThis paper presents experiments for embedded cooperative distributed model predictive control applied to a team of hovercraft floating on an air hockey table. The hovercraft collectively solve a centralized optimal control problem in each sampling step via a stabilizing decentralized real-time iteration scheme using the alternating direction method of multipliers. The efficient implementation does not require a central coordinator, executes onboard the hovercraft, and facilitates sampling intervals in the millisecond range. The formation control experiments showcase the flexibility of the approach on scenarios with point-to-point transitions, trajectory tracking, collision avoidance, and moving obstacles. Gösta Stomberg, Roland Schwan, Andrea Grillo, Colin N. Jones, Timm Faulwasser |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2019 | Bottleneck Identification and Performance Modeling of OPC UA Communication ModelsabstractThe OPC UA communication architecture is currently becoming an integral part of industrial automation systems, which control complex production processes, such as electric power generation or paper production. With a recently released extension for pub/sub communication, OPC UA can now also support fast cyclic control applications, but the bottlenecks of OPC UA implementations and their scalability on resource-constrained industrial devices are not yet well understood. Former OPC UA performance evaluations mainly concerned client/server round-trip times or focused on jitter, but did not explore resource bottlenecks or create predictive performance models. We have carried out extensive performance measurements with OPC UA client/server and pub/sub communication and created a CPU utilization prediction model based on linear regression that can be used to size hardware environments. We found that the server CPU is the main bottleneck for OPC UA pub/sub communication, but allows a throughput of up to 40,000 signals per second on a Raspberry Pi Zero. We also found that the client/server session management overhead can severely impact performance, if more than 20 clients access a single server. Andreas Burger, Heiko Koziolek, Julius Rückert, Marie Platenius-Mohr, Gösta Stomberg |
ICPE | 5 |