Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nitzan Tur

dblp:238/8258 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8810-4581ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.912025
On Differentially Private Linear Algebra · STOC 2025
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › approximation algorithms for graph problems
0-extension
0.512021
The metric relaxation for 0-extension admits an Ω(log2/3k) gap · STOC 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.512021
The metric relaxation for 0-extension admits an Ω(log2/3k) gap · STOC 2021
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation
integrality gap
0.512021
The metric relaxation for 0-extension admits an Ω(log2/3k) gap · STOC 2021
Mathematical optimization
linear programming relaxation
0.512021
The metric relaxation for 0-extension admits an Ω(log2/3k) gap · STOC 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

differential privacy · 0.9metric relaxation · 0.5algebraic topology · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 On Differentially Private Linear Algebra
Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Uri Stemmer, Nitzan Tur
STOC5
2021 The metric relaxation for 0-extension admits an Ω(log2/3k) gap
abstract
We consider the 0-Extension problem, where we are given an undirected graph G=(V,E) equipped with non-negative edge weights w:E→ ℝ+, a collection T={ t1,…,tk}⊆ V of k special vertices called terminals, and a semi-metric D over T. The goal is to assign every non-terminal vertex to a terminal while minimizing the sum over all edges of the weight of the edge multiplied by the distance in D between the terminals to which the endpoints of the edge are assigned. 0-Extension admits two known algorithms, achieving approximations of O(logk) [Călinescu-Karloff-Rabani SICOMP ’05] and O(logk/loglogk) [Fakcharoenphol-Harrelson-Rao-Talwar SODA ’03]. Both known algorithms are based on rounding a natural linear programming relaxation called the metric relaxation, in which D is extended from T to the entire of V. The current best known integrality gap for the metric relaxation is Ω (√logk). In this work we present an improved integrality gap of Ω(log2/3k) for the metric relaxation. Our construction is based on the randomized extension of one graph by another, a notion that captures lifts of graphs as a special case and might be of independent interest. Inspired by algebraic topology, our analysis of the gap instance is based on proving no continuous section (in the topological sense) exists in the randomized extension.
Roy Schwartz 0002, Nitzan Tur
STOC2