Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Balint Kovacs
dblp:238/9253
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1191-0646ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
prompt-based segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › open-world segmentation
zero-shot segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation
lesion segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation › lesion segmentation
tumor segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Skeleton Recall Loss for Connectivity Conserving and Resource Efficient Segmentation of Thin Tubular Structures · ECCV (77) 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › medical image segmentation
tubular structure segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Skeleton Recall Loss for Connectivity Conserving and Resource Efficient Segmentation of Thin Tubular Structures · ECCV (77) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 1.7promptable segmentation · 1.74d tracking · 1.7skeletonization · 0.8connectivity-preserving loss · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body ImagingabstractIn this work, we present LesionLocator, a framework for zero-shot longitudinal lesion tracking and segmentation in 3D medical imaging, establishing the first end-to-end model capable of 4D tracking with dense spatial prompts. Our model leverages an extensive dataset of 23,262 annotated medical scans, as well as synthesized longitudinal data across diverse lesion types. The diversity and scale of our dataset significantly enhances model generalizability to real-world medical imaging challenges and addresses key limitations in longitudinal data availability. LesionLocator outperforms all existing promptable models in lesion segmentation by nearly 10 dice points, reaching human-level performance, and achieves state-of-the-art results in lesion tracking, with superior lesion retrieval and segmentation accuracy. LesionLocator not only sets a new benchmark in universal promptable lesion segmentation and automated longitudinal lesion tracking but also provides the first open-access solution of its kind, releasing our synthetic 4D dataset and model to the community, empowering future advancements in medical imaging. Code is available at: www.github.com/MIC-DKFZ/LesionLocator Maximilian Rokuss, Yannick Kirchhoff, Seval Akbal, Balint Kovacs, Saikat Roy, Constantin Ulrich, Tassilo Wald, Lukas T. Rotkopf, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Klaus H. Maier-Hein |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2025 | Cross-Modality Supervised Prostate Segmentation on CBCT for Adaptive Radiotherapy
Balint Kovacs, Goran Stanic, Fabian Weykamp, Florian Ebert, Dimitrios Bounias, Bouchra Tawk, Martin Niklas, Jakob Liermann, Oliver Jäkel, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Ralf Floca, Kristina Giske |
MICCAI (6) | 1 |
| 2025 | Including AI in diffusion-weighted breast MRI has potential to increase reader confidence and reduce workloadabstractOBJECTIVES: Breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown potential as a standalone imaging technique for certain indications, eg, supplemental screening of women with dense breasts. This study evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for clinical interpretation and workload reduction in breast DWI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective IRB-approved study included: n = 824 examinations for model development (2017-2020) and n = 235 for evaluation (01/2021-06/2021). Readings were performed by three readers using either the AI-CAD or manual readings. BI-RADS-like (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) classification was based on DWI. Histopathology served as ground truth. The model was nnDetection-based, trained using 5-fold cross-validation and ensembling. Statistical significance was determined using McNemar's test. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Model performance was calculated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: The AI-augmented approach significantly reduced BI-RADS-like 3 calls in breast DWI by 29% (P =.019) and increased interrater agreement (0.57 ± 0.10 vs 0.49 ± 0.11), while preserving diagnostic accuracy. Two of the three readers detected more malignant lesions (63/69 vs 59/69 and 64/69 vs 62/69) with the AI-CAD. The AI model achieved an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: [0.72, 0.85]; P <.001), which increased for women at screening age to 0.82 (95% CI: [0.73, 0.90]; P <.001), indicating a potential for workload reduction of 20.9% at 96% sensitivity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Breast DWI might benefit from AI support. In our study, AI showed potential for reduction of BI-RADS-like 3 calls and increase of inter-rater agreement. However, given the limited study size, further research is needed. Dimitrios Bounias, Lina Simons, Michael Baumgartner 0001, Chris Ehring, Peter Neher, Lorenz A. Kapsner, Balint Kovacs, Ralf Floca, Paul F. Jaeger, Jessica Eberle, Dominique Hadler, Frederik B. Laun, Sabine Ohlmeyer, Lena Maier-Hein, Michael Uder, Evelyn Wenkel, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Sebastian Bickelhaupt |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 7 |
| 2024 | Skeleton Recall Loss for Connectivity Conserving and Resource Efficient Segmentation of Thin Tubular Structures
Yannick Kirchhoff, Maximilian Rokuss, Saikat Roy, Balint Kovacs, Constantin Ulrich, Tassilo Wald, Maximilian Zenk, Philipp Vollmuth, Jens Kleesiek, Fabian Isensee, Klaus H. Maier-Hein |
ECCV (77) | 4 |
| 2023 | Anatomy-Informed Data Augmentation for Enhanced Prostate Cancer Detection
Balint Kovacs, Nils Netzer, Michael Baumgartner 0001, Carolin Eith, Dimitrios Bounias, Clara Meinzer, Paul F. Jaeger, Kevin S. Zhang, Ralf Floca, Adrian Schrader, Fabian Isensee, Regula Gnirs, Magdalena Görtz, Viktoria Schütz, Albrecht Stenzinger, Markus Hohenfellner, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Ivo Wolf, David Bonekamp, Klaus H. Maier-Hein |
MICCAI (7) | 1 |