Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Baris Serhan

dblp:239/0258 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4862-7008ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 51% Segmentation and scene understanding · 26% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 17%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration
0.812024
ToP-ToM: Trust-aware Robot Policy with Theory of Mind · ICRA 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
theory of mind
0.812024
ToP-ToM: Trust-aware Robot Policy with Theory of Mind · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation
0.612022
Push-to-See: Learning Non-Prehensile Manipulation to Enhance Instance Segmentation via Deep Q-Learning · ICRA 2022
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
interactive segmentation
0.612022
Push-to-See: Learning Non-Prehensile Manipulation to Enhance Instance Segmentation via Deep Q-Learning · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot manipulation
nonprehensile manipulation
0.612022
Push-to-See: Learning Non-Prehensile Manipulation to Enhance Instance Segmentation via Deep Q-Learning · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
robotic pushing
0.612022
Push-to-See: Learning Non-Prehensile Manipulation to Enhance Instance Segmentation via Deep Q-Learning · ICRA 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.212024
ToP-ToM: Trust-aware Robot Policy with Theory of Mind · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.212022
Push-to-See: Learning Non-Prehensile Manipulation to Enhance Instance Segmentation via Deep Q-Learning · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
singulation
0.212022
Push-to-See: Learning Non-Prehensile Manipulation to Enhance Instance Segmentation via Deep Q-Learning · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trust-aware reward function · 0.8theory of mind modeling · 0.8depth images · 0.6deep q-learning · 0.6Mask R-CNN · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 ToP-ToM: Trust-aware Robot Policy with Theory of Mind
abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) is a fundamental cognitive architecture that endows humans with the ability to attribute mental states to others. Humans infer the desires, beliefs, and intentions of others by observing their behavior and, in turn, adjust their actions to facilitate better interpersonal communication and team collaboration. In this paper, we investigated trust-aware robot policy with the theory of mind in a multi-agent setting where a human collaborates with a robot against another human opponent. We show that by only focusing on team performance, the robot may resort to the reverse psychology trick, which poses a significant threat to trust maintenance. The human’s trust in the robot will collapse when they discover deceptive behavior by the robot. To mitigate this problem, we adopt the robot theory of mind model to infer the human’s trust beliefs, including true belief and false belief (an essential element of ToM). We designed a dynamic trust-aware reward function based on different trust beliefs to guide the robot policy learning, which aims to balance between avoiding human trust collapse due to robot reverse psychology and leveraging its potential to boost team performance. The experimental results demonstrate the importance of the ToM-based robot policy for human-robot trust and the effectiveness of our robot ToM-based robot policy in multiagent interaction settings.
Chuang Yu 0001, Baris Serhan, Angelo Cangelosi
ICRA2
2022 Push-to-See: Learning Non-Prehensile Manipulation to Enhance Instance Segmentation via Deep Q-Learning
abstract
Efficient robotic manipulation of objects for sorting and searching often rely upon how well the objects are perceived and the available grasp poses. The challenge arises when the objects are irregular, have similar visual features (e.g., textureless objects) and the scene is densely cluttered. In such cases, non-prehensile manipulation (e.g., pushing) can facilitate grasping or searching by improving object perception and singulating the objects from the clutter via physical interaction. The current robotics literature in interactive segmentation focuses solely on isolated cases, where the central aim is on searching or singulating a single target object, or segmenting sparsely cluttered scenes, mainly through matching visual futures in successive scenes before and after the robotic interaction. On the other hand, in this paper, we introduce the first interactive segmentation model in the literature that can autonomously enhance the instance segmentation of such challenging scenes as a whole via optimising a Q-value function that predicts appropriate pushing actions for singulation. We achieved this by training a deep reinforcement learning model with reward signals generated by a Mask-RCNN trained solely on depth images. We evaluated our model in experiments by comparing its success on segmentation quality with a heuristic baseline, as well as the state-of-the-art Visual Pushing and Grasping (VPG) model [1]. Our model significantly outperformed both baselines in all benchmark scenarios. Furthermore, decreasing the segmentation error inherently enabled the autonomous singulation of the scene as a whole. Our evaluation experiments also serve as a benchmark for interactive segmentation research.
Baris Serhan, Harit Pandya, Ayse Küçükyilmaz, Gerhard Neumann
ICRA1
2018 Coupling Dynamical and Connectionist Models: Representation of Spatial Attention via Learned Deictic Gestures in Human-Robot Interaction
Baris Serhan, John P. Spencer, Angelo Cangelosi
CogSci1