Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Scheffler
dblp:239/3023
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-5572-731XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network performance modeling · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network performance modeling
network calculus |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Network Calculus With Flow Prolongation - A Feedforward FIFO Analysis Enabled by ML · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023 |
Network performance modeling › network calculus
worst-case delay bound |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Network Calculus With Flow Prolongation - A Feedforward FIFO Analysis Enabled by ML · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.7flow prolongation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Network Calculus With Flow Prolongation - A Feedforward FIFO Analysis Enabled by MLabstractThe derivation of upper bounds on data flows’ worst-case traversal times is an important task in many application areas. For accurate bounds, model simplifications should be avoided even in large networks. Network Calculus (NC) provides a modeling framework and different analyses for delay bounding. We investigate the analysis of feedforward networks where all queues implement First-In First-Out (FIFO) service. Correctly considering the effect of data flows onto each other under FIFO is already a challenging task. Yet, the fastest available NC FIFO analysis (called LUDB) suffers from limitations resulting in unnecessarily loose bounds. A feature called Flow Prolongation (FP) has been shown to improve delay bound accuracy significantly. Unfortunately, FP needs to be executed within this NC FIFO analysis very often and each time it creates an exponentially growing set of alternative networks with prolongations. FP therefore does not scale and has been out of reach for the exhaustive analysis of large networks. We introduce DeepFP, an approach to make FP scale by predicting prolongations using machine learning. In our evaluation, we show that DeepFP can improve results in FIFO networks considerably. Compared to the aforementioned LUDB analysis, DeepFP reduces delay bounds by$12.1 \;\%$on average at negligible additional computational cost. Fabien Geyer, Alexander Scheffler, Steffen Bondorf |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 2021 | Tightening Network Calculus Delay Bounds by Predicting Flow Prolongations in the FIFO AnalysisabstractNetwork calculus offers the means to compute worst-case traversal times based on interpreting a system as a queueing network. A major strength of network calculus is its strict separation of modeling and analysis frameworks. That is, a model is purely descriptive and can be put into multiple different analyses to derive a data flow's worst-case traversal time bound. One of the recent results in this category is the so-called flow prolongation. Flow prolongation actively manipulates the internal model of the analysis by virtually extending the path of flows, i.e., by deliberately creating a more pessimistic setting of resource contention between flows. It was shown that flow prolongation can theoretically decrease worst-case traversal time bounds under certain assumptions. Yet, due to its exhaustive search, it was also shown that flow prolongation does not scale and it might not even have an impact in larger queueing networks. In this paper we introduce DeepFP, an approach to make the analysis scale by predicting flow prolongations using a graph neural network. In our evaluation, we show that DeepFP can improve results in networks of FIFO queues considerably, where the delay bound can be reduced by 13.7% in large FIFO networks at negligible additional cost on the execution time of the analysis. Fabien Geyer, Alexander Scheffler, Steffen Bondorf |
RTAS | 2 |