Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hwalsuk Lee

dblp:239/4244 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 32% Image recognition and object detection · 27% Segmentation and scene understanding · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard: Evaluating Large Language Models in Korean with Ko-H5 Benchmark · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation › data-efficient image generation
few-shot image generation
0.412020
Few-Shot Compositional Font Generation with Dual Memory · ECCV (19) 2020
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
scene text segmentation
0.412020
Character Region Attention for Text Spotting · ECCV (29) 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene text spotting
0.412020
Character Region Attention for Text Spotting · ECCV (29) 2020
Visual content generation and editing
font generation
0.412020
Few-Shot Compositional Font Generation with Dual Memory · ECCV (19) 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene text detection
0.412019
Character Region Awareness for Text Detection · CVPR 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212024
Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard: Evaluating Large Language Models in Korean with Ko-H5 Benchmark · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dual memory · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.8convolutional neural network · 0.4attention mechanism · 0.4character-level annotation · 0.4affinity estimation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard: Evaluating Large Language Models in Korean with Ko-H5 Benchmark
abstract
Chanjun Park, Hyeonwoo Kim, Dahyun Kim, SeongHwan Cho, Sanghoon Kim, Sukyung Lee, Yungi Kim, Hwalsuk Lee. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Chanjun Park, Hyeonwoo Kim, Dahyun Kim 0001, Seonghwan Cho, Sukyung Lee, Hwalsuk Lee
ACL (1)8
2020 Scale down Transformer by Grouping Features for a Lightweight Character-level Language Model
abstract
This paper introduces a method that efficiently reduces the computational cost and parameter size of Transformer.The proposed model, refer to as Group-Transformer, splits feature space into multiple groups, factorizes the calculation paths, and reduces computations for the group interaction.Extensive experiments on two benchmark tasks, enwik8 and text8, prove our model's effectiveness and efficiency in small-scale Transformers.To the best of our knowledge, Group-Transformer is the first attempt to design Transformer with the group strategy, widely used for efficient CNN architectures.
Sungrae Park, Geewook Kim, Junyeop Lee, Junbum Cha, Jihoon Kim 0002, Hwalsuk Lee
COLING6
2020 Character Region Attention for Text Spotting
Youngmin Baek, Seung Shin, Jeonghun Baek, Sungrae Park, Junyeop Lee, Daehyun Nam, Hwalsuk Lee
ECCV (29)7
2020 Few-Shot Compositional Font Generation with Dual Memory
Junbum Cha, Sanghyuk Chun, Gayoung Lee, Bado Lee, Seonghyeon Kim, Hwalsuk Lee
ECCV (19)6
2019 Character Region Awareness for Text Detection
abstract
Scene text detection methods based on neural networks have emerged recently and have shown promising results. Previous methods trained with rigid word-level bounding boxes exhibit limitations in representing the text region in an arbitrary shape. In this paper, we propose a new scene text detection method to effectively detect text area by exploring each character and affinity between characters. To overcome the lack of individual character level annotations, our proposed framework exploits both the given character-level annotations for synthetic images and the estimated character-level ground-truths for real images acquired by the learned interim model. In order to estimate affinity between characters, the network is trained with the newly proposed representation for affinity. Extensive experiments on six benchmarks, including the TotalText and CTW-1500 datasets which contain highly curved texts in natural images, demonstrate that our character-level text detection significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art detectors. According to the results, our proposed method guarantees high flexibility in detecting complicated scene text images, such as arbitrarily-oriented, curved, or deformed texts.
Youngmin Baek, Bado Lee, Dongyoon Han, Sangdoo Yun, Hwalsuk Lee
CVPR5
2019 What Is Wrong With Scene Text Recognition Model Comparisons? Dataset and Model Analysis
abstract
Many new proposals for scene text recognition (STR) models have been introduced in recent years. While each claim to have pushed the boundary of the technology, a holistic and fair comparison has been largely missing in the field due to the inconsistent choices of training and evaluation datasets. This paper addresses this difficulty with three major contributions. First, we examine the inconsistencies of training and evaluation datasets, and the performance gap results from inconsistencies. Second, we introduce a unified four-stage STR framework that most existing STR models fit into. Using this framework allows for the extensive evaluation of previously proposed STR modules and the discovery of previously unexplored module combinations. Third, we analyze the module-wise contributions to performance in terms of accuracy, speed, and memory demand, under one consistent set of training and evaluation datasets. Such analyses clean up the hindrance on the current comparisons to understand the performance gain of the existing modules. Our code is publicly available.
Jeonghun Baek, Geewook Kim, Junyeop Lee, Sungrae Park, Dongyoon Han, Sangdoo Yun, Seong Joon Oh, Hwalsuk Lee
ICCV8