Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Stefanov
dblp:239/4331
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 62% Web and social media mining · 38% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining › user behavior analysis
political leaning prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020 |
Data mining › text mining › text classification
stance detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020 |
Data mining › clustering
unsupervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised learning · 0.4cascaded classification · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using TweetsabstractDiscovering the stances of media outlets and influential people on current, debatable topics is important for social statisticians and policy makers.Many supervised solutions exist for determining viewpoints, but manually annotating training data is costly.In this paper, we propose a cascaded method that uses unsupervised learning to ascertain the stance of Twitter users with respect to a polarizing topic by leveraging their retweet behavior; then, it uses supervised learning based on user labels to characterize both the general political leaning of online media and of popular Twitter users, as well as their stance with respect to the target polarizing topic.We evaluate the model by comparing its predictions to gold labels from the Media Bias/Fact Check website, achieving 82.6% accuracy. Peter Stefanov, Kareem Darwish, Atanas Atanasov, Preslav Nakov |
ACL | 1 |
| 2020 | Unsupervised User Stance Detection on Twitter
Kareem Darwish, Peter Stefanov, Michaël Aupetit 0001, Preslav Nakov |
ICWSM | 2 |