Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Stefanov

dblp:239/4331 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 62% Web and social media mining · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining › user behavior analysis
political leaning prediction
0.412020
Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020
Data mining › text mining › text classification
stance detection
0.412020
Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020
Data mining
clustering
0.112020
Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020
Data mining › clustering
unsupervised learning
0.112020
Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised learning · 0.4cascaded classification · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets
abstract
Discovering the stances of media outlets and influential people on current, debatable topics is important for social statisticians and policy makers.Many supervised solutions exist for determining viewpoints, but manually annotating training data is costly.In this paper, we propose a cascaded method that uses unsupervised learning to ascertain the stance of Twitter users with respect to a polarizing topic by leveraging their retweet behavior; then, it uses supervised learning based on user labels to characterize both the general political leaning of online media and of popular Twitter users, as well as their stance with respect to the target polarizing topic.We evaluate the model by comparing its predictions to gold labels from the Media Bias/Fact Check website, achieving 82.6% accuracy.
Peter Stefanov, Kareem Darwish, Atanas Atanasov, Preslav Nakov
ACL1
2020 Unsupervised User Stance Detection on Twitter
Kareem Darwish, Peter Stefanov, Michaël Aupetit 0001, Preslav Nakov
ICWSM2