Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Seongho Son

dblp:239/4949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Reinforcement learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
bradley-terry model
0.912025
Right Now, Wrong Then: Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimization under Preference Drift · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.912025
Right Now, Wrong Then: Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimization under Preference Drift · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
Right Now, Wrong Then: Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimization under Preference Drift · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
0.912025
Right Now, Wrong Then: Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimization under Preference Drift · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exponential weighting · 0.9dynamic bradley-terry model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Right Now, Wrong Then: Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimization under Preference Drift
abstract
Current Large Language Model (LLM) preference optimization algorithms do not account for temporal preference drift, which can lead to severe misalignment. To address this limitation, we propose **Non-Stationary Direct Preference Optimisation (NS-DPO)** that models time-dependent reward functions with a Dynamic Bradley-Terry model. NS-DPO proposes a computationally efficient solution by introducing only a single discount parameter in the loss function, which is used for exponential weighting that proportionally focuses learning on more time-relevant datapoints. We theoretically analyze the convergence of NS-DPO in a general setting where the exact nature of the preference drift is not known, providing upper bounds on the estimation error and regret caused by non-stationary preferences. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of NS-DPO for fine-tuning LLMs under drifting preferences. Using scenarios where various levels of preference drift is introduced, with popular LLM reward models and datasets, we show that NS-DPO fine-tuned LLMs remain robust under non-stationarity, significantly outperforming baseline algorithms that ignore temporal preference changes, without sacrificing performance in stationary cases.
Seongho Son, William Bankes, Sayak Ray Chowdhury, Brooks Paige, Ilija Bogunovic
ICML1
2022 Creating Pro-Level AI for a Real-Time Fighting Game Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) combined with deep neural networks has performed remarkably well in many genres of games recently. It has surpassed human-level performance in fixed game environments and turn-based two-player board games. However, to the best of our knowledge, current research has yet to produce a result that has surpassed human-level performance in modern complex fighting games. This is due to the inherent difficulties with real-time fighting games, including: vast action spaces, action dependencies, and imperfect information. We overcame these challenges and made 1v1 battle AI agents for the commercial gameBlade and Soul. The trained agents competed against five professional gamers and achieved a winning rate of 62%. This article presents a practical RL method that includes a novel self-play curriculum and data skipping techniques. Through the curriculum, three different styles of agents were created by reward shaping and were trained against each other. Additionally, this article suggests data-skipping techniques that could increase data efficiency and facilitate explorations in vast spaces. Since our method can be generally applied to all two-player competitive games with vast action spaces, we anticipate its application to game development including level design and automated balancing.
Inseok Oh, Seungeun Rho, Sangbin Moon, Seongho Son, Hyoil Lee, Jinyun Chung
IEEE Trans. Games4