Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ekin Öztürk
dblp:239/5690
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-4143-8725ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 62% Legged, aerial and field robots · 38% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 77% Geometric modeling and processing · 23% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer animation and physical simulation › performance capture
facial performance capture |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Practical and Scalable Desktop-Based High-Quality Facial Capture · ECCV (6) 2022 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Aggressive Online Control of a Quadrotor via Deep Network Representations of Optimality Principles · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Aggressive Online Control of a Quadrotor via Deep Network Representations of Optimality Principles · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robot control › UAV control
quadrotor control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Aggressive Online Control of a Quadrotor via Deep Network Representations of Optimality Principles · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Aggressive Online Control of a Quadrotor via Deep Network Representations of Optimality Principles · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
time-optimal control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Aggressive Online Control of a Quadrotor via Deep Network Representations of Optimality Principles · ICRA 2020 |
Geometric modeling and processing › 3d reconstruction › 3d human reconstruction
3d face reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Practical and Scalable Desktop-Based High-Quality Facial Capture · ECCV (6) 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
learning control |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Aggressive Online Control of a Quadrotor via Deep Network Representations of Optimality Principles · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
direct nonlinear optimal control · 0.4differential flatness · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Practical and Scalable Desktop-Based High-Quality Facial Capture
Alexander Lattas, Jayanth Kannan, Ekin Öztürk, Luca Filipi, Giuseppe Claudio Guarnera, Gaurav Chawla, Abhijeet Ghosh |
ECCV (6) | 4 |
| 2020 | Aggressive Online Control of a Quadrotor via Deep Network Representations of Optimality PrinciplesabstractOptimal control holds great potential to improve a variety of robotic applications. The application of optimal control on-board limited platforms has been severely hindered by the large computational requirements of current state of the art implementations. In this work, we make use of a deep neural network to directly map the robot states to control actions. The network is trained offline to imitate the optimal control computed by a time consuming direct nonlinear method. A mixture of time optimality and power optimality is considered with a continuation parameter used to select the predominance of each objective. We apply our networks (termed G&CNets) to aggressive quadrotor control, first in simulation and then in the real world. We give insight into the factors that influence the `reality gap' between the quadrotor model used by the offline optimal control method and the real quadrotor. Furthermore, we explain how we set up the model and the control structure on-board of the real quadrotor to successfully close this gap and perform time-optimal maneuvers in the real world. Finally, G&CNet's performance is compared to state-of-the-art differential-flatness-based optimal control methods. We show, in the experiments, that G&CNets lead to significantly faster trajectory execution due to, in part, the less restrictive nature of the allowed state-to-input mappings. Ekin Öztürk, Christophe De Wagter, Guido de Croon, Dario Izzo |
ICRA | 2 |