Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sujay Khandagale

dblp:239/5762 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Learning theory · 35% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
tabular data learning
0.712023
When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data? · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.612022
On the Generalizability and Predictability of Recommender Systems · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning and data management › automated machine learning
algorithm selection
0.612022
On the Generalizability and Predictability of Recommender Systems · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 1.1large-scale benchmarking · 1.1hyperparameter optimization · 1.1metafeature analysis · 0.7large-scale empirical comparison · 0.7hyperparameter tuning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?
abstract
Tabular data is one of the most commonly used types of data in machine learning. Despite recent advances in neural nets (NNs) for tabular data, there is still an active discussion on whether or not NNs generally outperform gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs) on tabular data, with several recent works arguing either that GBDTs consistently outperform NNs on tabular data, or vice versa. In this work, we take a step back and question the importance of this debate. To this end, we conduct the largest tabular data analysis to date, comparing 19 algorithms across 176 datasets, and we find that the 'NN vs. GBDT' debate is overemphasized: for a surprisingly high number of datasets, either the performance difference between GBDTs and NNs is negligible, or light hyperparameter tuning on a GBDT is more important than choosing between NNs and GBDTs. Next, we analyze dozens of metafeatures to determine what \emph{properties} of a dataset make NNs or GBDTs better-suited to perform well. For example, we find that GBDTs are much better than NNs at handling skewed or heavy-tailed feature distributions and other forms of dataset irregularities. Our insights act as a guide for practitioners to determine which techniques may work best on their dataset. Finally, with the goal of accelerating tabular data research, we release the TabZilla Benchmark Suite: a collection of the 36 'hardest' of the datasets we study. Our benchmark suite, codebase, and all raw results are available at https://github.com/naszilla/tabzilla.
Duncan C. McElfresh, Sujay Khandagale, Jonathan Valverde, Vishak Prasad C., Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Micah Goldblum, Colin White
NeurIPS2
2022 Unsupervised Stem-based Cross-lingual Part-of-Speech Tagging for Morphologically Rich Low-Resource Languages
abstract
Unsupervised cross-lingual projection for part-of-speech (POS) tagging relies on the use of parallel data to project POS tags from a source language for which a POS tagger is available onto a target language across word-level alignments. The projected tags then form the basis for learning a POS model for the target language. However, languages with rich morphology often yield sparse word alignments because words corresponding to the same citation form do not align well. We hypothesize that for morphologically complex languages, it is more efficient to use the stem rather than the word as the core unit of abstraction. Our contributions are: 1) we propose an unsupervised stem-based cross-lingual approach for POS tagging for low-resource languages of rich morphology; 2) we further investigate morpheme-level alignment and projection; and 3) we examine whether the use of linguistic priors for morphological segmentation improves POS tagging. We conduct experiments using six source languages and eight morphologically complex target languages of diverse typologies. Our results show that the stem-based approach improves the POS models for all the target languages, with an average relative error reduction of 10.3% in accuracy per target language, and outperforms the word-based approach that operates on three-times more data for about two thirds of the language pairs we consider. Moreover, we show that morpheme-level alignment and projection and the use of linguistic priors for morphological segmentation further improve POS tagging.
Ramy Eskander, Cass Lowry, Sujay Khandagale, Judith L. Klavans, Maria Polinsky, Smaranda Muresan
NAACL-HLT3
2022 On the Generalizability and Predictability of Recommender Systems
abstract
While other areas of machine learning have seen more and more automation, designing a high-performing recommender system still requires a high level of human effort. Furthermore, recent work has shown that modern recommender system algorithms do not always improve over well-tuned baselines. A natural follow-up question is, "how do we choose the right algorithm for a new dataset and performance metric?" In this work, we start by giving the first large-scale study of recommender system approaches by comparing 24 algorithms and 100 sets of hyperparameters across 85 datasets and 315 metrics. We find that the best algorithms and hyperparameters are highly dependent on the dataset and performance metric. However, there is also a strong correlation between the performance of each algorithm and various meta-features of the datasets. Motivated by these findings, we create RecZilla, a meta-learning approach to recommender systems that uses a model to predict the best algorithm and hyperparameters for new, unseen datasets. By using far more meta-training data than prior work, RecZilla is able to substantially reduce the level of human involvement when faced with a new recommender system application. We not only release our code and pretrained RecZilla models, but also all of our raw experimental results, so that practitioners can train a RecZilla model for their desired performance metric: https://github.com/naszilla/reczilla.
Duncan C. McElfresh, Sujay Khandagale, Jonathan Valverde, John Dickerson 0001, Colin White
NeurIPS2
2020 Why state-of-the-art deep learning barely works as good as a linear classifier in extreme multi-label text classification
Mohammad Reza Mohammadnia-Qaraei, Sujay Khandagale, Rohit Babbar
ESANN2
2020 Bonsai: diverse and shallow trees for extreme multi-label classification
abstract
Abstract Extreme multi-label classification ( XMC ) refers to supervised multi-label learning involving hundreds of thousands or even millions of labels. In this paper, we develop a suite of algorithms, called , which generalizes the notion of label representation in XMC, and partitions the labels in the representation space to learn shallow trees. We show three concrete realizations of this label representation space including: (i) the input space which is spanned by the input features, (ii) the output space spanned by label vectors based on their co-occurrence with other labels, and (iii) the joint space by combining the input and output representations. Furthermore, the constraint-free multi-way partitions learnt iteratively in these spaces lead to shallow trees. By combining the effect of shallow trees and generalized label representation, achieves the best of both worlds—fast training which is comparable to state-of-the-art tree-based methods in XMC, and much better prediction accuracy, particularly on tail-labels. On a benchmark Amazon-3M dataset with 3 million labels, outperforms a state-of-the-art one-vs-rest method in terms of prediction accuracy, while being approximately 200 times faster to train. The code for is available at https://github.com/xmc-aalto/bonsai .
Sujay Khandagale, Rohit Babbar
Mach. Learn.1
2019 A Simple and Effective Scheme for Data Pre-processing in Extreme Classification
Sujay Khandagale, Rohit Babbar
ESANN1