Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tal Ridnik
dblp:239/5966
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 39% Learning paradigms · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
asymmetric loss |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classification · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classification · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classification · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial annotation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Loss · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search › one-shot neural architecture search
differentiable architecture search |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | XNAS: Neural Architecture Search with Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | XNAS: Neural Architecture Search with Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | XNAS: Neural Architecture Search with Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
prediction with expert advice |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | XNAS: Neural Architecture Search with Expert Advice · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classification · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporary model for class distribution estimation · 0.6class-aware selective loss · 0.6negative sample down-weighting · 0.5hard thresholding · 0.5asymmetric loss · 0.5regret minimization · 0.4prediction with expert advice · 0.4gradient-based search · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ML-Decoder: Scalable and Versatile Classification HeadabstractIn this paper, we introduce ML-Decoder, a new attention-based classification head. ML-Decoder predicts the existence of class labels via queries, and enables better utilization of spatial data compared to global average pooling. By redesigning the decoder architecture, and using a novel group-decoding scheme, ML-Decoder is highly efficient, and can scale well to thousands of classes. Compared to using a larger backbone, ML-Decoder consistently provides a better speed-accuracy trade-off. ML-Decoder is also versatile - it can be used as a drop-in replacement for various classification heads, and generalize to unseen classes when operated with word queries. Novel query augmentations further improve its generalization ability. Using ML-Decoder, we achieve state-of-the-art results on several classification tasks: on MS-COCO multi-label, we reach 91.1% mAP; on NUS-WIDE zero-shot, we reach 31.1% ZSL mAP; and on ImageNet single-label, we reach with vanilla ResNet50 backbone a new top score of 80.7%, without extra data or distillation. Public code will be available. Tal Ridnik, Gilad Sharir, Avi Ben-Cohen, Emanuel Ben Baruch, Asaf Noy |
WACV | 1 |
| 2022 | Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective LossabstractLarge-scale multi-label classification datasets are commonly, and perhaps inevitably, partially annotated. That is, only a small subset of labels are annotated per sample. Different methods for handling the missing labels induce different properties on the model and impact its accuracy. In this work, we analyze the partial labeling problem, then propose a solution based on two key ideas. First, un-annotated labels should be treated selectively according to two probability quantities: the class distribution in the overall dataset and the specific label likelihood for a given data sample. We propose to estimate the class distribution using a dedicated temporary model, and we show its improved efficiency over a naive estimation computed using the dataset's partial annotations. Second, during the training of the target model, we emphasize the contribution of annotated labels over originally un-annotated labels by using a dedicated asymmetric loss. With our novel approach, we achieve state-of-the-art results on OpenImages dataset (e.g. reaching 87.3 mAP on V6). In addition, experiments conducted on LVIS and simulated-COCO demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Code is available at https://github.com/Alibaba-MIIL/PartialLabelingCSL. Emanuel Ben Baruch, Tal Ridnik, Itamar Friedman, Avi Ben-Cohen, Nadav Zamir, Asaf Noy, Lihi Zelnik-Manor |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label ClassificationabstractIn a typical multi-label setting, a picture contains on average few positive labels, and many negative ones. This positive-negative imbalance dominates the optimization process, and can lead to under-emphasizing gradients from positive labels during training, resulting in poor accuracy. In this paper, we introduce a novel asymmetric loss ("ASL"), which operates differently on positive and negative samples. The loss enables to dynamically down-weights and hard-thresholds easy negative samples, while also discarding possibly mislabeled samples. We demonstrate how ASL can balance the probabilities of different samples, and how this balancing is translated to better mAP scores. With ASL, we reach state-of-the-art results on multiple popular multi-label datasets: MS-COCO, Pascal-VOC, NUS-WIDE and Open Images. We also demonstrate ASL applicability for other tasks, such as single-label classification and object detection. ASL is effective, easy to implement, and does not increase the training time or complexity. Implementation is available at: https://github.com/Alibaba-MIIL/ASL. Tal Ridnik, Emanuel Ben Baruch, Nadav Zamir, Asaf Noy, Itamar Friedman, Matan Protter, Lihi Zelnik-Manor |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | TResNet: High Performance GPU-Dedicated ArchitectureabstractMany deep learning models, developed in recent years, reach higher ImageNet accuracy than ResNet50, with fewer or comparable FLOPs count. While FLOPs are often seen as a proxy for network efficiency, when measuring actual GPU training and inference throughput, vanilla ResNet50 is usually significantly faster than its recent competitors, offering better throughput-accuracy trade-off. In this work, we introduce a series of architecture modifications that aim to boost neural networks' accuracy, while retaining their GPU training and inference efficiency. We first demonstrate and discuss the bottlenecks induced by FLOPs oriented optimizations. We then suggest alternative designs that better utilize GPU structure and assets. Finally, we introduce a new family of GPU-dedicated models, called TResNet, which achieves better accuracy and efficiency than previous ConvNets1. Using a TResNet model, with similar GPU throughput to ResNet50, we reach 80.8% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet. Our TResNet models also transfer well and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on competitive single-label classification datasets such as Stanford Cars (96.0%), CIFAR-10 (99.0%), CIFAR-100 (91.5%) and Oxford-Flowers (99.1%). TResNet models also achieve state-of-the-art results on a multi-label classification task, and perform well on object detection. Tal Ridnik, Hussam Lawen, Asaf Noy, Emanuel Ben Baruch, Gilad Sharir, Itamar Friedman |
WACV | 1 |
| 2020 | ASAP: Architecture Search, Anneal and PruneabstractAutomatic methods for Neural ArchitectureSearch (NAS) have been shown to produce state-of-the-art network models, yet, their main drawback is the computational complexity of the search process. As some primal methods optimized over a discrete search space, thousands of days of GPU were required for convergence. A recent approach is based on constructing a differentiable search space that enables gradient-based optimization, thus reducing the search time to a few days. While successful, such methods still include some incontinuous steps, e.g., the pruning of many weak connections at once. In this paper, we propose a differentiable search space that allows the annealing of architecture weights, while gradually pruning inferior operations, thus the search converges to a single output network in a continuous manner. Experiments on several vision datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method with respect to the search cost, accuracy and the memory footprint of the achieved model. Asaf Noy, Niv Nayman, Tal Ridnik, Nadav Zamir, Sivan Doveh, Itamar Friedman, Raja Giryes, Lihi Zelnik-Manor |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2019 | XNAS: Neural Architecture Search with Expert AdviceabstractThis paper introduces a novel optimization method for differential neural architecture search, based on the theory of prediction with expert advice. Its optimization criterion is well fitted for an architecture-selection, i.e., it minimizes the regret incurred by a sub-optimal selection of operations. Unlike previous search relaxations, that require hard pruning of architectures, our method is designed to dynamically wipe out inferior architectures and enhance superior ones. It achieves an optimal worst-case regret bound and suggests the use of multiple learning-rates, based on the amount of information carried by the backward gradients. Experiments show that our algorithm achieves a strong performance over several image classification datasets. Specifically, it obtains an error rate of 1.6% for CIFAR-10, 23.9% for ImageNet under mobile settings, and achieves state-of-the-art results on three additional datasets. Niv Nayman, Asaf Noy, Tal Ridnik, Itamar Friedman, Rong Jin 0001, Lihi Zelnik-Manor |
NeurIPS | 3 |