Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marie-Laure Zollinger

dblp:239/7924 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-6401-045XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 68% Usable security · 32%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
electronic voting
0.512021
Investigating Usability and User Experience of Individually Verifiable Internet Voting Schemes · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
individual verifiability
0.512021
Investigating Usability and User Experience of Individually Verifiable Internet Voting Schemes · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
electronic voting security
0.112019
Security - Visible, Yet Unseen? · CHI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

standardized evaluation scales · 0.8semi-structured interviews · 0.8between-group experiment · 0.8user study · 0.5qualitative analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Investigating Usability and User Experience of Individually Verifiable Internet Voting Schemes
abstract
Internet voting can afford more inclusive and inexpensive elections. The flip side is that the integrity of the election can be compromised by adversarial attacks and malfunctioning voting infrastructure. Individual verifiability aims to protect against such risks by letting voters verify that their votes are correctly registered in the electronic ballot box. Therefore, voters need to carry out additional tasks making human factors crucial for security. In this article, we establish a categorization of individually verifiable Internet voting schemes based on voter interactions. For each category in our proposed categorization, we evaluate a voting scheme in a user study with a total of 100 participants. In our study, we assessed usability, user experience, trust, and further qualitative data to gain deeper insights into voting schemes. Based on our results, we conclude with recommendations for developers and policymakers to inform the choices and design of individually verifiable Internet voting schemes.
Karola Marky, Marie-Laure Zollinger, Peter B. Rønne, Peter Y. A. Ryan, Tim Grube, Kai Kunze
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.2
2019 Security - Visible, Yet Unseen?
abstract
An unsolved debate in the field of usable security concerns whether security mechanisms should be visible, or black-boxed away from the user for the sake of usability. However, tying this question to pragmatic usability factors only might be simplistic. This study aims at researching the impact of displaying security mechanisms on User Experience (UX) in the context of e-voting. Two versions of an e-voting application were designed and tested using a between-group experimental protocol (N=38). Version D displayed security mechanisms, while version ND did not reveal any security-related information. We collected data on UX using stan-dardised evaluation scales and semi-structured interviews. Version D performed better overall in terms of UX and need fulfilment. Qualitative analysis of the interviews gives further insights into factors impacting perceived security. Our study adds to existing research suggesting a conceptual shift from usability to UX and discusses implications for designing and evaluating secure systems.
Verena Distler, Marie-Laure Zollinger, Carine Lallemand, Peter B. Rønne, Peter Y. A. Ryan, Vincent Koenig
CHI2