EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan Sharman
dblp:239/8088
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 77% Authentication and access control · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research
security usability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Usability of HTTPS Deployment · CHI 2019 |
Network security
HTTPS deployment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Usability of HTTPS Deployment · CHI 2019 |
Authentication and access control
certificate management |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | On the Usability of HTTPS Deployment · CHI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
within-subjects study · 0.8between-subjects study · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | On the Usability of HTTPS DeploymentabstractHTTPS and TLS are the backbone of Internet security, however setting up web servers to run these protocols is a notoriously difficult process. In this paper, we perform two live subjects usability studies on the deployment of HTTPS in a real-world setting. Study 1 is a within subjects comparison between traditional HTTPS configuration (purchasing a certificate and installing it on a server) and Let's Encrypt, which automates much of the process. Study 2 is a between subjects study looking at the same two systems, examining why users encounter usability issues. Overall we confirm past results that HTTPS is difficult to deploy, and we find some evidence that suggests Let's Encrypt is an easier, more efficient method for deploying HTTPS. Matthew Bernhard, Jonathan Sharman, Claudia Ziegler Acemyan, Philip T. Kortum, Dan S. Wallach, J. Alex Halderman |
CHI | 2 |