Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nico Lang

dblp:239/8412 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8434-027XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 42% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23% Vision and language · 11%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › open-world recognition
open-set recognition
1.622025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025
From Coarse to Fine-Grained Open-Set Recognition · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.912025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation
0.912025
Taxonomy-Aware Evaluation of Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
category discovery
0.812024
Labeled Data Selection for Category Discovery · ECCV (55) 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › domain-aware representation learning
geospatial representation learning
0.812024
MMEarth: Exploring Multi-modal Pretext Tasks for Geospatial Representation Learning · ECCV (64) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
From Coarse to Fine-Grained Open-Set Recognition · CVPR 2024
Environmental and earth informatics
biodiversity monitoring
0.312025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
species classification
0.312025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation
hierarchical representation learning
0.212024
From Coarse to Fine-Grained Open-Set Recognition · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

training-time regularization · 1.7post-hoc OSR · 1.7auxiliary data training · 1.7text similarity measures · 0.9taxonomy mapping · 0.9multi-modal pretext tasks · 0.8hierarchy-adversarial learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Taxonomy-Aware Evaluation of Vision-Language Models
abstract
When a vision–language model (VLM) is prompted to identify an entity depicted in an image, it may answer "I see a conifer," rather than the specific label NORWAY SPRUCE. This raises two issues for evaluation: Firstly, the unconstrained generated text needs to be mapped to the evaluation label space (i.e., CONIFER). Secondly, a useful classification measure should give partial credit to lessspecific, but not incorrect, answers (NORWAY SPRUCE being a type of CONIFER). To meet these requirements, we propose a framework for evaluating unconstrained text predictions such as those generated from a vision–language model against a taxonomy. Specifically, we propose the use of hierarchical precision and recall measures to assess the level of correctness and specificity of predictions with regard to a taxonomy. Experimentally, we first show that existing text similarity measures do not capture taxonomic similarity well. We then develop and compare different methods to map textual VLM predictions onto a taxonomy. This allows us to compute hierarchical similarity measures between the generated text and the ground truth labels. Finally, we analyze modern VLMs on fine-grained visual classification tasks based on our proposed taxonomic evaluation scheme. Data and code are made available at https://github.com/vesteinn/vlm-eval.
Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Kevin Du, Niklas Stoehr, Serge J. Belongie, Ryan Cotterell, Nico Lang, Stella Frank
CVPR6
2025 Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring
abstract
Global biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, yet little information isknown about most species and how their populations are changing. Indeed, some90% Earth’s species are estimated to be completely unknown. Machine learning hasrecently emerged as a promising tool to facilitate long-term, large-scale biodiversitymonitoring, including algorithms for fine-grained classification of species fromimages. However, such algorithms typically are not designed to detect examplesfrom categories unseen during training – the problem of open-set recognition(OSR) – limiting their applicability for highly diverse, poorly studied taxa such asinsects. To address this gap, we introduce Open-Insect, a large-scale, fine-graineddataset to evaluate unknown species detection across different geographic regionswith varying difficulty. We benchmark 38 OSR algorithms across three categories:post-hoc, training-time regularization, and training with auxiliary data, finding thatsimple post-hoc approaches remain a strong baseline. We also demonstrate how toleverage auxiliary data to improve species discovery in regions with limited data.Our results provide timely insights to guide the development of computer visionmethods for biodiversity monitoring and species discovery.
Yuyan Chen, Nico Lang, B. Christian Schmidt, Yves Basset, Sara Beery, Maxim Larrivée, David Rolnick
NeurIPS2
2024 From Coarse to Fine-Grained Open-Set Recognition
abstract
Open-set recognition (OSR) methods aim to identify whether or not a test example belongs to a category observed during training. Depending on how visually similar a test example is to the training categories, the OSR task can be easy or extremely challenging. However, the vast majority of previous work has studied OSR in the presence of large, coarse-grained semantic shifts. In contrast, many real-world problems are inherently fine-grained, which means that test examples may be highly visually similar to the training categories. Motivated by this observation, we investigate three aspects of OSR: label granularity, similarity between the open- and closed-sets, and the role of hierarchical supervision during training. To study these dimensions, we curate new open-set splits of a large fine-grained visual categorization dataset. Our analysis results in several interesting findings, including: (i) the best OSR method to use is heavily dependent on the degree of semantic shift present, and (ii) hierarchical representation learning can improve coarse-grained OSR, but has little effect on fine-grained OSR performance. To further enhance fine-grained OSR performance, we propose a hierarchy-adversarial learning method to discourage hierarchical structure in the representation space, which results in a perhaps counter-intuitive behaviour, and a relative improvement in fine-grained OSR of up to 2% in AUROC and 7% in AUPR over standard training. Code and data are available: langnico.github. io/fine-grained-osr.
Nico Lang, Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Elijah Cole, Oisin Mac Aodha, Christian Igel, Serge J. Belongie
CVPR1
2024 MMEarth: Exploring Multi-modal Pretext Tasks for Geospatial Representation Learning
Vishal Nedungadi, Ankit Kariryaa, Stefan Oehmcke, Serge J. Belongie, Christian Igel, Nico Lang
ECCV (64)6
2024 Labeled Data Selection for Category Discovery
Bingchen Zhao, Nico Lang, Serge J. Belongie, Oisin Mac Aodha
ECCV (55)2