Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiyang Hu
dblp:239/8741
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
10since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7269-3828ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 1 first-author · 8 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 47% Graph learning · 19% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Data mining · 73% Information retrieval · 27% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 54% Systems and software security · 46% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
2.6 | 5 | 2024 | PyGOD: A Python Library for Graph Outlier Detection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark · NeurIPS 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
outlier detection |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier Detection · ICDM 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Causal Reasoning · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Causal Reasoning · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Lost in Execution: On the Multilingual Robustness of Tool Calling in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
tool use |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Lost in Execution: On the Multilingual Robustness of Tool Calling in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval › reranking
LLM-based reranking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Are LLMs Reliable Rankers? Rank Manipulation via Two-Stage Token Optimization · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval
reranking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Are LLMs Reliable Rankers? Rank Manipulation via Two-Stage Token Optimization · ACL (1) 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
adversarial attack on retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Are LLMs Reliable Rankers? Rank Manipulation via Two-Stage Token Optimization · ACL (1) 2026 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
graph anomaly detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PyGOD: A Python Library for Graph Outlier Detection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ADGym: Design Choices for Deep Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2023 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › outlier detection
unsupervised outlier detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BOND: Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Node Detection on Static Attributed Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BOND: Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Node Detection on Static Attributed Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph anomaly detection
node anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BOND: Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Node Detection on Static Attributed Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
algorithm benchmarking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark · NeurIPS 2022 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Optimal Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Optimal Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Optimal Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › decision tree
optimal decision tree |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Optimal Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
supervised fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Causal Reasoning · AAAI 2026 |
Data mining
high-dimensional data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
token optimization · 2.0greedy coordinate gradient · 2.0matrix factorization · 1.1graph neural network · 1.1supervised fine-tuning · 1.0multilingual evaluation · 1.0chain-of-thought · 1.0causal DAG construction · 1.0bit-vector library · 0.8analytical bounds · 0.8nonparametric estimation · 0.7empirical cumulative distribution functions · 0.7benchmarking · 0.7automated design selection · 0.7copula modeling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Causal ReasoningabstractLarge language models (LLMs) exhibit logically inconsistent hallucinations that appear coherent yet violate reasoning principles, with recent research suggesting an inverse relationship between causal reasoning capabilities and such hallucinations. However, existing reasoning approaches in LLMs, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its graph-based variants, operate at the linguistic token level rather than modeling the underlying causal relationships between variables, lacking the ability to represent conditional independencies or satisfy causal identification assumptions. To bridge this gap, we introduce causal-DAG construction and reasoning (CDCR-SFT), a supervised fine-tuning framework that trains LLMs to explicitly construct variable-level directed acyclic graph (DAG) and then perform reasoning over it. Moreover, we present a dataset comprising 25,368 samples (CausalDR), where each sample includes an input question, explicit causal DAG, graph-based reasoning trace, and validated answer. Experiments on four LLMs across eight tasks show that CDCR-SFT improves the causal reasoning capability with the state-of-the-art 95.33% accuracy on CLADDER (surpassing human performance of 94.8% for the first time) and reduces the hallucination on HaluEval with 10% improvements. It demonstrates that explicit causal structure modeling in LLMs can effectively mitigate logical inconsistencies in LLM outputs. Yuangang Li 0002, Yiqing Shen 0003, Yi Nian, Jiechao Gao, Ziyi Wang 0012, Chenxiao Yu, Li Li 0006, Jie Wang 0006, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao 0016 |
AAAI | 9 |
| 2026 | Lost in Execution: On the Multilingual Robustness of Tool Calling in Large Language ModelsabstractZheng Luo, T Pranav Kutralingam, Ogochukwu N. Okoani, Wanpeng Xu, Hua Wei, Xiyang Hu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Thirulogasankar Pranav Kutralingam, Ogochukwu N. Okoani, Wanpeng Xu, Hua Wei 0001, Xiyang Hu |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2026 | Are LLMs Reliable Rankers? Rank Manipulation via Two-Stage Token OptimizationabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as rerankers in information retrieval, yet their ranking behavior can be steered by small, natural-sounding prompts.To expose this vulnerability, we present Rank Anything First (RAF), a two-stage token optimization method that crafts concise textual perturbations to consistently promote a target item in LLMgenerated rankings while remaining hard to detect.Stage 1 uses Greedy Coordinate Gradient to shortlist candidate tokens at the current position by combining the gradient of the rank-target with a readability score; Stage 2 evaluates those candidates under exact ranking and readability losses using an entropy-based dynamic weighting scheme, and selects a token via temperature-controlled sampling.RAF generates ranking-promoting prompts tokenby-token, guided by dual objectives: maximizing ranking effectiveness and preserving linguistic naturalness.Experiments across multiple LLMs show that RAF significantly boosts the rank of target items using naturalistic language, with greater robustness than existing methods in both promoting target items and maintaining naturalness.These findings underscore a critical security implication: LLMbased reranking is inherently susceptible to adversarial manipulation, raising new challenges for the trustworthiness and robustness of modern retrieval systems. Tiancheng Xing, Xiyang Hu |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | Secure On-Device Video OOD Detection without Backpropagation
Shawn Li, Peilin Cai, Yuxiao Zhou 0006, Zhiyu Ni, Renjie Liang, You Qin, Yi Nian, Zhengzhong Tu, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao 0016 |
ICCV | 9 |
| 2024 | Flood Simulation: Integrating UAS Imagery and Ai-Generated Data With Diffusion ModelabstractThe primary goal of early disaster impact assessments is to gather georeferenced data about affected areas. Floods, a major natural calamity, pose challenges in data collection and response coordination. The use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) has significantly improved data acquisition in flood-impacted regions, offering a cost-effective method for obtaining high-quality images. However, issues like accurate image description and data scarcity remain. Addressing these, we propose two novel methods: GPT models for precise image-to-text conversion and diffusion models for flood data simulation. GPT models enhance data quality with accurate descriptions, while diffusion models extend our dataset by simulating diverse flood scenarios, enriching our training resources. Further analysis of this augmented dataset for similarity demonstrates a wide-ranging variety in the data, highlighting a diverse array of elements within images. Xiyang Hu, Maryam Rahnemoonfar |
IGARSS | 1 |
| 2024 | PyGOD: A Python Library for Graph Outlier DetectionabstractPyGOD is an open-source Python library for detecting outliers in graph data. As the first comprehensive library of its kind, PyGOD supports a wide array of leading graph-based methods for outlier detection under an easy-to-use, well-documented API designed for use by both researchers and practitioners. PyGOD provides modularized components of the different detectors implemented so that users can easily customize each detector for their purposes. To ease the construction of detection workflows, PyGOD offers numerous commonly used utility functions. To scale computation to large graphs, PyGOD supports functionalities for deep models such as sampling and mini-batch processing. PyGOD uses best practices in fostering code reliability and maintainability, including unit testing, continuous integration, and code coverage. To facilitate accessibility, PyGOD is released under a BSD 2-Clause license at https://pygod.org and at the Python Package Index (PyPI). Kay Liu, Yingtong Dou, Xueying Ding, Xiyang Hu, Ruitong Zhang 0001, Hao Peng 0001, Lichao Sun 0001, Philip S. Yu |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2023 | ADGym: Design Choices for Deep Anomaly DetectionabstractDeep learning (DL) techniques have recently found success in anomaly detection (AD) across various fields such as finance, medical services, and cloud computing. However, most of the current research tends to view deep AD algorithms as a whole, without dissecting the contributions of individual design choices like loss functions and network architectures. This view tends to diminish the value of preliminary steps like data preprocessing, as more attention is given to newly designed loss functions, network architectures, and learning paradigms. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by asking two key questions: (i) Which design choices in deep AD methods are crucial for detecting anomalies? (ii) How can we automatically select the optimal design choices for a given AD dataset, instead of relying on generic, pre-existing solutions? To address these questions, we introduce ADGym, a platform specifically crafted for comprehensive evaluation and automatic selection of AD design elements in deep methods. Our extensive experiments reveal that relying solely on existing leading methods is not sufficient. In contrast, models developed using ADGym significantly surpass current state-of-the-art techniques. Minqi Jiang, Chaochuan Hou, Ao Zheng, Songqiao Han, Hailiang Huang 0003, Qingsong Wen, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao 0016 |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2023 | ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution FunctionsabstractOutlier detection refers to the identification of data points that deviate from a general data distribution. Existing unsupervised approaches often suffer from high computational cost, complex hyperparameter tuning, and limited interpretability, especially when working with large, high-dimensional datasets. To address these issues, we present a simple yet effective algorithm calledECOD(Empirical-Cumulative-distribution-based Outlier Detection), which is inspired by the fact that outliers are often the “rare events” that appear in the tails of a distribution. In a nutshell,ECODfirst estimates the underlying distribution of the input data in a nonparametric fashion by computing the empirical cumulative distribution per dimension of the data.ECODthen uses these empirical distributions to estimate tail probabilities per dimension for each data point. Finally,ECODcomputes an outlier score of each data point by aggregating estimated tail probabilities across dimensions. Our contributions are as follows: (1) we propose a novel outlier detection method calledECOD, which is both parameter-free and easy to interpret; (2) we perform extensive experiments on 30 benchmark datasets, where we find thatECODoutperforms 11 state-of-the-art baselines in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and scalability; and (3) we release an easy-to-use and scalable (with distributed support) Python implementation for accessibility and reproducibility. Yue Zhao 0016, Xiyang Hu, Nicola Botta, Cezar Ionescu, George H. Chen |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 3 |
| 2022 | ADBench: Anomaly Detection BenchmarkabstractGiven a long list of anomaly detection algorithms developed in the last few decades, how do they perform with regard to (i) varying levels of supervision, (ii) different types of anomalies, and (iii) noisy and corrupted data? In this work, we answer these key questions by conducting (to our best knowledge) the most comprehensive anomaly detection benchmark with 30 algorithms on 57 benchmark datasets, named ADBench. Our extensive experiments (98,436 in total) identify meaningful insights into the role of supervision and anomaly types, and unlock future directions for researchers in algorithm selection and design. With ADBench, researchers can easily conduct comprehensive and fair evaluations for newly proposed methods on the datasets (including our contributed ones from natural language and computer vision domains) against the existing baselines. To foster accessibility and reproducibility, we fully open-source ADBench and the corresponding results. Songqiao Han, Xiyang Hu, Hailiang Huang 0003, Minqi Jiang, Yue Zhao 0016 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | BOND: Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Node Detection on Static Attributed GraphsabstractDetecting which nodes in graphs are outliers is a relatively new machine learning task with numerous applications. Despite the proliferation of algorithms developed in recent years for this task, there has been no standard comprehensive setting for performance evaluation. Consequently, it has been difficult to understand which methods work well and when under a broad range of settings. To bridge this gap, we present—to the best of our knowledge—the first comprehensive benchmark for unsupervised outlier node detection on static attributed graphs called BOND, with the following highlights. (1) We benchmark the outlier detection performance of 14 methods ranging from classical matrix factorization to the latest graph neural networks. (2) Using nine real datasets, our benchmark assesses how the different detection methods respond to two major types of synthetic outliers and separately to “organic” (real non-synthetic) outliers. (3) Using an existing random graph generation technique, we produce a family of synthetically generated datasets of different graph sizes that enable us to compare the running time and memory usage of the different outlier detection algorithms. Based on our experimental results, we discuss the pros and cons of existing graph outlier detection algorithms, and we highlight opportunities for future research. Importantly, our code is freely available and meant to be easily extendable: https://github.com/pygod-team/pygod/tree/main/benchmark Kay Liu, Yingtong Dou, Yue Zhao 0016, Xueying Ding, Xiyang Hu, Ruitong Zhang 0001, Kaize Ding, Canyu Chen, Hao Peng 0001, Kai Shu, Lichao Sun 0001, Jundong Li, George H. Chen, Philip S. Yu |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2020 | COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier DetectionabstractOutlier detection refers to the identification of rare items that are deviant from the general data distribution. Existing approaches suffer from high computational complexity, low predictive capability, and limited interpretability. As a remedy, we present a novel outlier detection algorithm called COPOD, which is inspired by copulas for modeling multivariate data distribution. COPOD first constructs an empirical copula, and then uses it to predict tail probabilities of each given data point to determine its level of “extremeness”. Intuitively, we think of this as calculating an anomalous p-value. This makes COPOD both parameter-free, highly interpretable, and computationally efficient. In this work, we make three key contributions, 1) propose a novel, parameter-free outlier detection algorithm with both great performance and interpretability, 2) perform extensive experiments on 30 benchmark datasets to show that COPOD outperforms in most cases and is also one of the fastest algorithms, and 3) release an easy-to-use Python implementation for reproducibility. Yue Zhao 0016, Nicola Botta, Cezar Ionescu, Xiyang Hu |
ICDM | 5 |
| 2019 | Optimal Sparse Decision TreesabstractDecision tree algorithms have been among the most popular algorithms for interpretable (transparent) machine learning since the early 1980's. The problem that has plagued decision tree algorithms since their inception is their lack of optimality, or lack of guarantees of closeness to optimality: decision tree algorithms are often greedy or myopic, and sometimes produce unquestionably suboptimal models. Hardness of decision tree optimization is both a theoretical and practical obstacle, and even careful mathematical programming approaches have not been able to solve these problems efficiently. This work introduces the first practical algorithm for optimal decision trees for binary variables. The algorithm is a co-design of analytical bounds that reduce the search space and modern systems techniques, including data structures and a custom bit-vector library. We highlight possible steps to improving the scalability and speed of future generations of this algorithm based on insights from our theory and experiments. Xiyang Hu, Cynthia Rudin, Margo I. Seltzer |
NeurIPS | 1 |