Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
June Xu
dblp:239/9680
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 50% Usability and user experience research · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction › interactive machine learning
machine teaching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Crowdsourcing the Perception of Machine Teaching · CHI 2020 |
Usability and user experience research › mental models
user misconceptions |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Crowdsourcing the Perception of Machine Teaching · CHI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deployment · 0.4crowdsourcing · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Crowdsourcing the Perception of Machine TeachingabstractTeachable interfaces can empower end-users to attune machine learning systems to their idiosyncratic characteristics and environment by explicitly providing pertinent training examples. While facilitating control, their effectiveness can be hindered by the lack of expertise or misconceptions. We investigate how users may conceptualize, experience, and reflect on their engagement in machine teaching by deploying a mobile teachable testbed in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Using a performance-based payment scheme, Mechanical Turkers (N=100) are called to train, test, and re-train a robust recognition model in real-time with a few snapshots taken in their environment. We find that participants incorporate diversity in their examples drawing from parallels to how humans recognize objects independent of size, viewpoint, location, and illumination. Many of their misconceptions relate to consistency and model capabilities for reasoning. With limited variation and edge cases in testing, the majority of them do not change strategies on a second training attempt. Jonggi Hong, Kyungjun Lee 0001, June Xu, Hernisa Kacorri |
CHI | 3 |