Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karl Frank

dblp:24/2031 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence similarity search
sequence database search
0.122010
COPS Benchmark: interactive analysis of database search methods · Bioinform. 2010
High-performance signal peptide prediction based on sequence alignment techniques · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.112010
COPS Benchmark: interactive analysis of database search methods · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein sequence analysis
0.112008
High-performance signal peptide prediction based on sequence alignment techniques · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis › protein sequence annotation
signal peptide prediction
0.112008
High-performance signal peptide prediction based on sequence alignment techniques · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure classification
0.012010
COPS Benchmark: interactive analysis of database search methods · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.012008
High-performance signal peptide prediction based on sequence alignment techniques · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ROC analysis · 0.1BLASTP · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 COPS Benchmark: interactive analysis of database search methods
abstract
SUMMARY: The performance of sequence database search methods is usually judged by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The proper interpretation of the results obtained and a fair comparison across different methods critically depends on the properties of the data set used for such an analysis; in particular, each query must have the same number of true positives and true negatives. Here, we present a novel web service based on a dataset specifically designed for ROC analysis and the investigation of alignment quality. The data set is derived from a quantitative classification of protein structures (COPS), while analysis and results are presented through an intuitive web interface. The analysis provides details such as false positives per query, and visualization of the structural similarity between query and targets. Most importantly, results obtained for a specific alignment method are immediately related to those obtained for several popular standard sequence alignment methods.
Karl Frank, Markus Gruber, Manfred J. Sippl
Bioinform.1
2008 High-performance signal peptide prediction based on sequence alignment techniques
abstract
UNLABELLED: The accuracy of current signal peptide predictors is outstanding. The most successful predictors are based on neural networks and hidden Markov models, reaching a sensitivity of 99% and an accuracy of 95%. Here, we demonstrate that the popular BLASTP alignment tool can be tuned for signal peptide prediction reaching the same high level of prediction success. Alignment-based techniques provide additional benefits. In spite of high success rates signal peptide predictors yield false predictions. Simple sequences like polyvaline, for example, are predicted as signal peptides. The general architecture of learning systems makes it difficult to trace the cause of such problems. This kind of false predictions can be recognized or avoided altogether by using sequence comparison techniques. Based on these results we have implemented a public web service, called Signal-BLAST. Predictions returned by Signal-BLAST are transparent and easy to analyze. AVAILABILITY: Signal-BLAST is available online at http://sigpep.services.came.sbg.ac.at/signalblast.html.
Karl Frank, Manfred J. Sippl
Bioinform.1