Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Melissa P. Chase
dblp:24/2328
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 37% Learning theory · 22% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 22% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
reverse engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture Views · ICSE 1997 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture Views · ICSE 1997 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › software architecture analysis
software architecture recovery |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture Views · ICSE 1997 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | On Analytical and Similarity-Based Classification · AAAI 1990 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
similarity-based classification |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | On Analytical and Similarity-Based Classification · AAAI 1990 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
case-based reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions · KR 1989 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
search control |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Approximating Learned Search Control Knowledge · ML 1989 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning
default reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions · KR 1989 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
nonmonotonic reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions · KR 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
view simplification · 0.0view combination · 0.0source code cross-referencing · 0.0approximation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Recovering Software Architecture from Multiple Source Code AnalysesabstractWe describe the experiences we have had in using ManSART - a software architecture recovery tool that we developed and are employing in the analysis of large scale legacy software systems. ManSART uses a battery of standard data flow, control flow, and program slicing capabilities to automatically recover architectural features from source code. This source code analysis is enabled by representations called analysis. Analysis modules describe the interfaces of each component in a multiple component system. ManSART uses these modules to focus source code analysis and to store the results. Melissa P. Chase, Steven M. Christey, David R. Harris 0001, Alexander S. Yeh |
PASTE | 1 |
| 1997 | Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture ViewsabstractAutomatically recovered (reverse engineered) architectural views of legacy software are valuable for carrying out many software engineering tasks.However, while directly recovered views provide some relevant information, they often are either too fragmented or complex to be really useful in practice.This paper describes methods for making views more useful.We automatically combine and/or simplify views to produce hierarchies, hybrids, and abstractions.The methods we use take advantage of the source code fragments underlying the views to cross-reference between parts from different views. Alexander S. Yeh, David R. Harris 0001, Melissa P. Chase |
ICSE | 3 |
| 1990 | On Analytical and Similarity-Based Classification
Marc B. Vilain, Phyllis Koton, Melissa P. Chase |
AAAI | 3 |
| 1989 | Approximating Learned Search Control Knowledge
Melissa P. Chase, Monte Zweben, Richard L. Piazza, John D. Burger, Paul P. Maglio, Haym Hirsh |
ML | 1 |
| 1989 | Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions
Phyllis Koton, Melissa P. Chase |
KR | 2 |