Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Melissa P. Chase

dblp:24/2328 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 37% Learning theory · 22% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 22%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
reverse engineering
0.011997
Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture Views · ICSE 1997
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.011997
Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture Views · ICSE 1997
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › software architecture analysis
software architecture recovery
0.011997
Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture Views · ICSE 1997
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.011990
On Analytical and Similarity-Based Classification · AAAI 1990
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
similarity-based classification
0.011990
On Analytical and Similarity-Based Classification · AAAI 1990
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
case-based reasoning
0.011989
Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions · KR 1989
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
search control
0.011989
Approximating Learned Search Control Knowledge · ML 1989
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning
default reasoning
0.011989
Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions · KR 1989
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
nonmonotonic reasoning
0.011989
Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions · KR 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

view simplification · 0.0view combination · 0.0source code cross-referencing · 0.0approximation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Recovering Software Architecture from Multiple Source Code Analyses
abstract
We describe the experiences we have had in using ManSART - a software architecture recovery tool that we developed and are employing in the analysis of large scale legacy software systems. ManSART uses a battery of standard data flow, control flow, and program slicing capabilities to automatically recover architectural features from source code. This source code analysis is enabled by representations called analysis. Analysis modules describe the interfaces of each component in a multiple component system. ManSART uses these modules to focus source code analysis and to store the results.
Melissa P. Chase, Steven M. Christey, David R. Harris 0001, Alexander S. Yeh
PASTE1
1997 Manipulating Recovered Software Architecture Views
abstract
Automatically recovered (reverse engineered) architectural views of legacy software are valuable for carrying out many software engineering tasks.However, while directly recovered views provide some relevant information, they often are either too fragmented or complex to be really useful in practice.This paper describes methods for making views more useful.We automatically combine and/or simplify views to produce hierarchies, hybrids, and abstractions.The methods we use take advantage of the source code fragments underlying the views to cross-reference between parts from different views.
Alexander S. Yeh, David R. Harris 0001, Melissa P. Chase
ICSE3
1990 On Analytical and Similarity-Based Classification
Marc B. Vilain, Phyllis Koton, Melissa P. Chase
AAAI3
1989 Approximating Learned Search Control Knowledge
Melissa P. Chase, Monte Zweben, Richard L. Piazza, John D. Burger, Paul P. Maglio, Haym Hirsh
ML1
1989 Knowledge Representation in a Case-Based Reasoning System: Defaults and Exceptions
Phyllis Koton, Melissa P. Chase
KR2