Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yunying Wu

dblp:24/3482 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › contact control › contact task control
robot force control
0.021996
On robust impact control via positive acceleration feedback for robot manipulators · ICRA 1996
Force and Transition Control with Enviromental Uncertainties · ICRA 1995
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › force control
impact control
0.011995
Force and Transition Control with Enviromental Uncertainties · ICRA 1995
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.021996
On robust impact control via positive acceleration feedback for robot manipulators · ICRA 1996
Force and Transition Control with Enviromental Uncertainties · ICRA 1995
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › hybrid control
switching control
0.011996
On robust impact control via positive acceleration feedback for robot manipulators · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
feedback linearization
0.011995
Force and Transition Control with Enviromental Uncertainties · ICRA 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

positive acceleration feedback · 0.0lyapunov stability analysis · 0.0feedback linearization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 An Interpretable and Generalizable Speech Detector Based on a CNN-LSTM Framework
abstract
Speech brain-computer interface (speech BCI) aims to reconstruct speech from recorded brain signals. Real-time speech BCI relies on speech detection, which is greatly impacted by the selection of speech-related neural frequency features. However, most studies did not investigate this aspect when designing speech detectors. In this study, both electrocorticography (ECoG) dataset and stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) dataset were utilized to investigate the impact of brain signal type on the contribution of frequency bands to speech detection. We calculated the mutual information (MI) between neural frequency bands and the audio envelope and found that the distributions of frequency bands varied between the two types of brain signals. Specifically, the 40-60Hz of ECoG signal and 0-20Hz of sEEG signal got the highest MI values. To address this, we propose a two-module detector that combines convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) for feature extraction and speech prediction. Our detector outperformed three commonly used detectors, including Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and LSTM. Notably, a high correlation was found between CNN output and the frequency bands, and high MI values were observed in both types of brain signals. These findings confirm the interpretability and generalizability of our proposed speech detector.
Zijun Wan, Yunying Wu, Mohamed Baha Ben Ticha, Gaël Le Godais, Philippe Kahane, Stéphan Chabardès, Weidong Chen 0002, Shaomin Zhang, Blaise Yvert
ICASSP2
1996 On robust impact control via positive acceleration feedback for robot manipulators
abstract
In this paper, a long outstanding problem, robust impact control and force regulation with guaranteed stability is solved by adding a novel positive acceleration, feedback to the feedback loop in the direction of impact and force control for robot manipulators working in an unknown environment. A quick and stable transition can be accomplished with a nonzero impact velocity, and the transient force response can be controlled with minimum impact forces and minimum bouncing. In addition, a switching control strategy is designed to guarantee the stability of the impact control. Unexpected bouncing can be eliminated after finite switches. The output force and motion can be regulated simultaneously with high accuracy after contact is established. Rigorous stability analysis based on the Liapunov-like method is presented for the proposed control scheme. The control scheme was implemented and tested on a 6 DOF PUMA 560 robot arm. The experimental comparisons with other force control strategies were given to demonstrate the advantage of the proposed method. The result obtained in this paper can be applied to any system requiring impact control and force regulation.
Yunying Wu, Tzyh Jong Tarn, Ning Xi 0001, Alberto Isidori
ICRA1
1995 Force and Transition Control with Enviromental Uncertainties
abstract
A new sensor-referenced control method for robot impact control and force regulation with environmental uncertainties is developed in this paper. The robot dynamic model is feedback linearized and decoupled for the free motion mode, the phase transition, mode as well as the constrained motion mode. After introducing an impact model, together with the proposed positive acceleration feedback control scheme, a stable contact can be made with a nonzero impact velocity. During the impact, large impact forces and bouncing can be avoided. Moreover, the output force can be regulated after contact is established. The scheme was implemented and tested on a 6 DOF PUMA 560 robot arm. The comparison with other control methods for robot phase transition is presented. The experimental results clearly demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method.
Yunying Wu, Tzyh Jong Tarn, Ning Xi 0001
ICRA1