Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Reece K. Hart
dblp:24/3688 · also Reece Hart
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3463-0775ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 85% Medical and health informatics · 15% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics
clinical diagnosis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | A Python package for parsing, validating, mapping and formatting sequence variants using HGVS nomenclature · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
high-throughput sequencing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | A Python package for parsing, validating, mapping and formatting sequence variants using HGVS nomenclature · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › motif discovery
pattern discovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Systematic and automated discovery of patterns in PROSITE families · RECOMB 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
protein classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Systematic and automated discovery of patterns in PROSITE families · RECOMB 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein family analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Systematic and automated discovery of patterns in PROSITE families · RECOMB 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
validation · 0.2parsing · 0.2supervised learning · 0.0statistical significance assessment · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | The GA4GH Variation Representation Specification (VRS): a Computational Framework for the Precise Representation of Molecular Variation
Alex H. Wagner, Lawrence J. Babb, Melissa S. Cline, Helen Schuilenburg, Tristan Nelson, Robert R. Freimuth, Reece K. Hart |
AMIA | 7 |
| 2015 | A Python package for parsing, validating, mapping and formatting sequence variants using HGVS nomenclatureabstractUNLABELLED: Biological sequence variants are commonly represented in scientific literature, clinical reports and databases of variation using the mutation nomenclature guidelines endorsed by the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS). Despite the widespread use of the standard, no freely available and comprehensive programming libraries are available. Here we report an open-source and easy-to-use Python library that facilitates the parsing, manipulation, formatting and validation of variants according to the HGVS specification. The current implementation focuses on the subset of the HGVS recommendations that precisely describe sequence-level variation relevant to the application of high-throughput sequencing to clinical diagnostics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The package is released under the Apache 2.0 open-source license. Source code, documentation and issue tracking are available at http://bitbucket.org/hgvs/hgvs/. Python packages are available at PyPI (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/hgvs). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Reece K. Hart, Rudolph Rico, Emily Hare, John Garcia, Jody Westbrook, Vincent A. Fusaro |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2000 | Systematic and automated discovery of patterns in PROSITE familiesabstractPROSITE is a method for protein classification which relies on a database of biologically significant sites and patterns in protein sequences. Most patterns in PROSITE have been gathered by a a labor intensive combination of experimental characterization of functional residues and sequence alignment. In this paper we present a new and efficient supervised learning procedure, based on the Splash deterministic pattern discovery algorithm and on a framework to assess the statistical significance of patterns. We demonstrate its application to the fully automatic discovery of patterns in 974 PROSITE families. For these families, Splash generates patterns with better specificity and/or sensitivity in 28%, identical statistics in 48%, and worse statistics in 15% of the cases; for the remaining families, patterns exhibited mixed behavior. Second, we have characterized the amount of overlap, on the sequences, between newly discovered patterns and those in PROSITE. In about 75% of the cases, Splash patterns identify sequence sites that overlap more than 50% with those reported in PROSITE. Of the 272 patterns which perform strictly better than the corresponding PROSITE pattern, 178 show more than 70% overlap with the PROSITE pattern. Third, our results suggest that the statistical significance of discovered patterns correlates well with their biological significance. Finally, we use the trypsin subfamily of serine proteases to illustrate the use of this method to exhaustively discover all motifs in a family that are statistically and biologically significant. The complete analysis is sufficiently rapid, taking less than a day for all PROSITE families, to enable the use this methodology for routine curation of existing motif and profile databases. Reece K. Hart, Ajay K. Royyuru, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Andrea Califano |
RECOMB | 1 |