Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harry R. Tennant

dblp:24/376 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
5 papers
Human-AI interaction · 57% User interface design and tools · 20% Interaction techniques and input · 15%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Programming languages and type systems · 54% Software testing · 23% Operating systems · 16%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 82% Trustworthy machine learning · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › large language model interaction › language-based interaction
natural language interface
0.041983
Building Usable Menu-Based Natural Language Interfaces To Databases · VLDB 1983
Usable natural language interfaces through menu-based natural language understanding · CHI 1983
Menu-Based Natural Language Understanding · ACL 1983
Programming languages and type systems
language design
0.011985
Software innovations for the texas instruments explorer computer · Proc. IEEE 1985
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding
0.011983
Menu-Based Natural Language Understanding · ACL 1983
Interaction techniques and input › selection techniques › command selection
menu interaction
0.011983
Menu-Based Natural Language Understanding · ACL 1983
Software testing
test coverage
0.011979
JETS: Achieving Completeness through Coverage and Closure · IJCAI 1979
Data models and query languages › natural language interface
natural language interface to database
0.011983
Menu-Based Natural Language Understanding · ACL 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic grammar · 0.0predictive left-corner parsing · 0.0lexicon · 0.0menu-based natural language interface · 0.0evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Natural Language Interfaces - Ready for Commercial Success?
Wolfgang Wahlster, Jaime G. Carbonell, Gary G. Hendrix, Harry R. Tennant
COLING4
1985 Software innovations for the texas instruments explorer computer
abstract
Explorer is a LISP Machine from Texas Instruments. Its software starts with a vast body of software developed at MIT. Texas Instruments has stabilized that software and added more packages and utilities. This paper describes certain innovations in Texas Instrument's software for the Explorer. TI's software innovations were in two areas: increasing the learnability of this sophisticated system and adding software components as an aid to prototypers and software developers. Learning aid innovations are embodied in Suggestions Menus and the Universal Command Loop. Software component innovations are embodied in the Universal Command Loop, the Graphics Window System and Graphics Editor, the Relational Table Manager, and the Menu-Based Natural Language Interface. The innovations represented are of two kinds: innovations in concept(Suggestions Menus, Universal Command Loop, and Menu-Based Natural Language Interface) and innovations in design (Graphics Window System, Relational Table Manager).
Harry R. Tennant, Roger R. Bate, Stephen M. Corey, Lawrence Davis, Paul Kline, Lamott G. Oren, M. Rajinikanth, Richard M. Saenz, Daniel Stenger, Craig W. Thompson
Proc. IEEE1
1983 Menu-Based Natural Language Understanding
abstract
This paper describes the NLMenu System, a menu-based natural language understanding system. Rather than requiring the user to type his input to the system, input to NLMenu is made by selecting items from a set of dynamically changing menus. Active menus and items are determined by a predictive left-corner parser that accesses a semantic grammar and lexicon. The advantage of this approach is that all inputs to the NLMenu System can be understood thus giving a 0% failure rate. A companion system that can automatically generate interfaces to relational databases is also discussed.
Harry R. Tennant, Kenneth M. Ross, Richard M. Saenz, Craig W. Thompson, James R. Miller
ACL1
1983 Usable natural language interfaces through menu-based natural language understanding
abstract
Conventional natural language interfaces suffer from several ease-of-use problems. They require a user to type and to formulate questions in a way that the system can understand. They have high failure rates which often frustrate users, and users often do not use features of the systems because they are unaware of them or don't trust them. In addition, conventional natural language systems are expensive to build and require large amounts of storage to use. This paper describes a new approach to natural language interfaces called menu-based natural language understanding. This new approach solves the problems listed above. The paper compares the menu-based natural language approach to conventional natural language interfaces and to other forms of interface and discusses the advantages and limitations of this new approach.
Harry R. Tennant, Kenneth M. Ross, Craig W. Thompson
CHI1
1983 Building Usable Menu-Based Natural Language Interfaces To Databases
Craig W. Thompson, Kenneth M. Ross, Harry R. Tennant, Richard M. Saenz
VLDB3
1981 What Makes Evaluation Hard?
abstract
No abstract available.
Harry R. Tennant
ACL1
1981 Issues for Ease of Use in personal computing (abstract only)
abstract
It has been demonstrated that interactive natural language dialog is remarkably unruly, with many misspellings and grammatical errors. Although progress has been made in getting computers to process pristine English text, the day when computers will be able to process unlimited interactive natural language dialog is still very far off.The vast majority of the effort that has gone into designing interactive natural language systems has concentrated on the computer half of the human-computer dyad. Our approach concentrates on the human half. Specifically, the goal of our research is to define a human engineered subset of natural language that retains all of the user-oriented benefits of unrestricted natural language dialog, while greatly reducing the processing burden that true natural language interaction places on the computer. This paper is a preliminary examination of the possibility that these criteria may be satisfied by simply asking usres to be concise.
Harry R. Tennant
CHI (2)1
1979 JETS: Achieving Completeness through Coverage and Closure
Tim Finin, Bradley A. Goodman, Harry R. Tennant
IJCAI3
1979 Experience with the Evaluation of Natural Language Question Answerers
Harry R. Tennant
IJCAI1