Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eleni Giannoulatou
dblp:24/3936
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7084-6736ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.9 | 3 | 2020 | dv-trio: a family-based variant calling pipeline using DeepVariant · Bioinform. 2020 Spliceogen: an integrative, scalable tool for the discovery of splice-altering variants · Bioinform. 2019 GenoSNP: a variational Bayes within-sample SNP genotyping algorithm that does not require a reference population · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant calling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | dv-trio: a family-based variant calling pipeline using DeepVariant · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant annotation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Spliceogen: an integrative, scalable tool for the discovery of splice-altering variants · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome sequencing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | SVPV: a structural variant prediction viewer for paired-end sequencing datasets · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | SVPV: a structural variant prediction viewer for paired-end sequencing datasets · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genotyping |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | GenoSNP: a variational Bayes within-sample SNP genotyping algorithm that does not require a reference population · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | GenoSNP: a variational Bayes within-sample SNP genotyping algorithm that does not require a reference population · Bioinform. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mendelian genetic model · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4maxentscan · 0.4genesplicer · 0.4branchpointer · 0.4ESRseq · 0.4graphical user interface · 0.3batch processing · 0.3variational bayes · 0.1mixture model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Systematic evaluation of de novo mutation calling tools using whole genome sequencing dataabstractDe novo mutations (DNMs) are genetic alterations that occur for the first time in an offspring. DNMs have been found to be a significant cause of severe developmental disorders. With the widespread use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, accurate detection of DNMs is crucial. Several bioinformatics tools have been developed to call DNMs from NGS data, but no study to date has systematically compared these tools. We used both real whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from a trio from the 1000 Genomes Project (1000G) and an in-house simulated trio dataset to evaluate five DNM calling tools: DeNovoGear, TrioDeNovo, PhaseByTransmission, VarScan 2, and DeNovoCNN. For DNMs called in the real dataset, we observed 8.4% concordance of variants between all tools, while 83.8% of DNMs variants were identified by only one caller. For simulated trio WGS dataset spiked with 100 DNMs, the concordance rate was also low at 3.9%. DeNovoGear achieved the highest F1 score on the real 1000G dataset, while DeNovoCNN had the highest F1 score on the simulated data. Our study provides valuable recommendations for the selection and application of DNM callers on WGS trio data. Anushi Shah, Steven Monger, Michael Troup, Eddie Ip, Eleni Giannoulatou |
Briefings Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2023 | ConanVarvar: a versatile tool for the detection of large syndromic copy number variation from whole-genome sequencing dataabstractBACKGROUND: A wide range of tools are available for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. However, none of them focus on clinically-relevant CNVs, such as those that are associated with known genetic syndromes. Such variants are often large in size, typically 1-5 Mb, but currently available CNV callers have been developed and benchmarked for the discovery of smaller variants. Thus, the ability of these programs to detect tens of real syndromic CNVs remains largely unknown. RESULTS: Here we present ConanVarvar, a tool which implements a complete workflow for the targeted analysis of large germline CNVs from WGS data. ConanVarvar comes with an intuitive R Shiny graphical user interface and annotates identified variants with information about 56 associated syndromic conditions. We benchmarked ConanVarvar and four other programs on a dataset containing real and simulated syndromic CNVs larger than 1 Mb. In comparison to other tools, ConanVarvar reports 10-30 times less false-positive variants without compromising sensitivity and is quicker to run, especially on large batches of samples. CONCLUSIONS: ConanVarvar is a useful instrument for primary analysis in disease sequencing studies, where large CNVs could be the cause of disease. Mikhail Gudkov, Loïc Thibaut, Matloob Khushi, Gillian M. Blue, David S. Winlaw, Sally L. Dunwoodie, Eleni Giannoulatou |
BMC Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2020 | dv-trio: a family-based variant calling pipeline using DeepVariantabstractMOTIVATION: In 2018, Google published an innovative variant caller, DeepVariant, which converts pileups of sequence reads into images and uses a deep neural network to identify single-nucleotide variants and small insertion/deletions from next-generation sequencing data. This approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art tools. However, DeepVariant was designed to call variants within a single sample. In disease sequencing studies, the ability to examine a family trio (father-mother-affected child) provides greater power for disease mutation discovery. RESULTS: To further improve DeepVariant's variant calling accuracy in family-based sequencing studies, we have developed a family-based variant calling pipeline, dv-trio, which incorporates the trio information from the Mendelian genetic model into variant calling based on DeepVariant. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: dv-trio is available via an open source BSD3 license at GitHub (https://github.com/VCCRI/dv-trio/). CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Eddie Ip, Clinton Hadinata, Joshua W. K. Ho, Eleni Giannoulatou |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2019 | Spliceogen: an integrative, scalable tool for the discovery of splice-altering variantsabstractMOTIVATION: In silico prediction tools are essential for identifying variants which create or disrupt cis-splicing motifs. However, there are limited options for genome-scale discovery of splice-altering variants. RESULTS: We have developed Spliceogen, a highly scalable pipeline integrating predictions from some of the individually best performing models for splice motif prediction: MaxEntScan, GeneSplicer, ESRseq and Branchpointer. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Spliceogen is available as a command line tool which accepts VCF/BED inputs and handles both single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels (https://github.com/VCCRI/Spliceogen). SNV databases with prediction scores are also available, covering all possible SNVs at all genomic positions within all Gencode-annotated multi-exon transcripts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Steven Monger, Michael Troup, Eddie Ip, Sally L. Dunwoodie, Eleni Giannoulatou |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2017 | SVPV: a structural variant prediction viewer for paired-end sequencing datasetsabstractMOTIVATION: A wide range of algorithms exist for the prediction of structural variants (SVs) from paired-end whole genome sequencing (WGS) alignments. It is essential for the purpose of quality control to be able to visualize, compare and contrast the data underlying the predictions across multiple different algorithms. RESULTS: We provide the structural variant prediction viewer, a tool which presents a visual summary of the most relevant features for SV prediction from WGS data. SV calls from multiple prediction algorithms may be visualized together, along with annotation of population allele frequencies from reference SV datasets. Gene annotations may also be included. The application is capable of running in a Graphical User Interface (GUI) mode for visualizing SVs one by one, or in batch mode for processing many SVs serially. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SVPV is available at GitHub ( https://github.com/VCCRI/SVPV/ ). CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jacob E. Munro, Sally L. Dunwoodie, Eleni Giannoulatou |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2014 | Verification and validation of bioinformatics software without a gold standard: a case study of BWA and BowtieabstractBACKGROUND: Bioinformatics software quality assurance is essential in genomic medicine. Systematic verification and validation of bioinformatics software is difficult because it is often not possible to obtain a realistic "gold standard" for systematic evaluation. Here we apply a technique that originates from the software testing literature, namely Metamorphic Testing (MT), to systematically test three widely used short-read sequence alignment programs. RESULTS: MT alleviates the problems associated with the lack of gold standard by checking that the results from multiple executions of a program satisfy a set of expected or desirable properties that can be derived from the software specification or user expectations. We tested BWA, Bowtie and Bowtie2 using simulated data and one HapMap dataset. It is interesting to observe that multiple executions of the same aligner using slightly modified input FASTQ sequence file, such as after randomly re-ordering of the reads, may affect alignment results. Furthermore, we found that the list of variant calls can be affected unless strict quality control is applied during variant calling. CONCLUSION: Thorough testing of bioinformatics software is important in delivering clinical genomic medicine. This paper demonstrates a different framework to test a program that involves checking its properties, thus greatly expanding the number and repertoire of test cases we can apply in practice. Eleni Giannoulatou, Shin-Ho Park, David T. Humphreys, Joshua W. K. Ho |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2008 | GenoSNP: a variational Bayes within-sample SNP genotyping algorithm that does not require a reference populationabstractUNLABELLED: Current genotyping algorithms typically call genotypes by clustering allele-specific intensity data on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) by SNP basis. This approach assumes the availability of a large number of control samples that have been sampled on the same array and platform. We have developed a SNP genotyping algorithm for the Illumina Infinium SNP genotyping assay that is entirely within-sample and does not require the need for a population of control samples nor parameters derived from such a population. Our algorithm exhibits high concordance with current methods and >99% call accuracy on HapMap samples. The ability to call genotypes using only within-sample information makes the method computationally light and practical for studies involving small sample sizes and provides a valuable independent quality control metric for other population-based approaches. AVAILABILITY: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~giannoul/GenoSNP/. Eleni Giannoulatou, Christopher Yau, Stefano Colella, Jiannis Ragoussis, Christopher C. Holmes |
Bioinform. | 1 |