Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eda Baykan

dblp:24/4001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 52% Information retrieval · 48%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › text mining › text classification
web page classification
0.112009
Purely URL-based topic classification · WWW 2009
Data mining › text mining › text classification
URL classification
0.112008
Web page language identification based on URLs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008
Information retrieval › search engines
web crawling
0.112008
Web page language identification based on URLs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008
Information retrieval
web search
0.112008
Web page language identification based on URLs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.1binary classifier · 0.1machine learning algorithms · 0.1country-code top-level domain analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 A Comprehensive Study of Techniques for URL-Based Web Page Language Classification
abstract
Given only the URL of a Web page, can we identify its language? In this article we examine this question. URL-based language classification is useful when the content of the Web page is not available or downloading the content is a waste of bandwidth and time. We built URL-based language classifiers for English, German, French, Spanish, and Italian by applying a variety of algorithms and features. As algorithms we used machine learning algorithms which are widely applied for text classification and state-of-art algorithms for language identification of text. As features we used words, various sized n-grams, and custom-made features (our novel feature set). We compared our approaches with two baseline methods, namely classification by country code top-level domains and classification by IP addresses of the hosting Web servers. We trained and tested our classifiers in a 10-fold cross-validation setup on a dataset obtained from the Open Directory Project and from querying a commercial search engine. We obtained the lowest F1-measure for English (94) and the highest F1-measure for German (98) with the best performing classifiers. We also evaluated the performance of our methods: (i) on a set of Web pages written in Adobe Flash and (ii) as part of a language-focused crawler. In the first case, the content of the Web page is hard to extract and in the second page downloading pages of the “wrong” language constitutes a waste of bandwidth. In both settings the best classifiers have a high accuracy with an F1-measure between 95 (for English) and 98 (for Italian) for the Adobe Flash pages and a precision between 90 (for Italian) and 97 (for French) for the language-focused crawler.
Eda Baykan, Monika Henzinger, Ingmar Weber
ACM Trans. Web1
2011 A Comprehensive Study of Features and Algorithms for URL-Based Topic Classification
abstract
Given only the URL of a Web page, can we identify its topic? We study this problem in detail by exploring a large number of different feature sets and algorithms on several datasets. We also show that the inherent overlap between topics and the sparsity of the information in URLs makes this a very challenging problem. Web page classification without a page’s content is desirable when the content is not available at all, when a classification is needed before obtaining the content, or when classification speed is of utmost importance. For our experiments we used five different corpora comprising a total of about 3 million (URL, classification) pairs. We evaluated several techniques for feature generation and classification algorithms. The individual binary classifiers were then combined via boosting into metabinary classifiers. We achieve typical F-measure values between 80 and 85, and a typical precision of around 86. The precision can be pushed further over 90 while maintaining a typical level of recall between 30 and 40.
Eda Baykan, Monika Henzinger, Ludmila Marian, Ingmar Weber
ACM Trans. Web1
2009 A Comparison of Techniques for Sampling Web Pages
abstract
As the World Wide Web is growing rapidly, it is getting increasingly challenging to gather representative information about it. Instead of crawling the web exhaustively one has to resort to other techniques like sampling to determine the properties of the web. A uniform random sample of the web would be useful to determine the percentage of web pages in a specific language, on a topic or in a top level domain. Unfortunately, no approach has been shown to sample the web pages in an unbiased way. Three promising web sampling algorithms are based on random walks. They each have been evaluated individually, but making a comparison on different data sets is not possible. We directly compare these algorithms in this paper. We performed three random walks on the web under the same conditions and analyzed their outcomes in detail. We discuss the strengths and the weaknesses of each algorithm and propose improvements based on experimental results.
Eda Baykan, Monika Henzinger, Stefan F. Keller, Sebastian De Castelberg, Markus Kinzler
STACS1
2009 Purely URL-based topic classification
abstract
Given only the URL of a web page, can we identify its topic? This is the question that we examine in this paper. Usually, web pages are classified using their content, but a URL-only classifier is preferable, (i) when speed is crucial, (ii) to enable content filtering before an (objection-able) web page is downloaded, (iii) when a page's content is hidden in images, (iv) to annotate hyperlinks in a personalized web browser, without fetching the target page, and (v) when a focused crawler wants to infer the topic of a target page before devoting bandwidth to download it. We apply a machine learning approach to the topic identification task and evaluate its performance in extensive experiments on categorized web pages from the Open Directory Project (ODP). When training separate binary classifiers for each topic, we achieve typical F-measure values between 80 and 85, and a typical precision of around 85. We also ran experiments on a small data set of university web pages. For the task of classifying these pages into faculty, student, course and project pages, our methods improve over previous approaches by 13.8 points of F-measure.
Eda Baykan, Monika Henzinger, Ludmila Marian, Ingmar Weber
WWW1
2008 Web page language identification based on URLs
abstract
Given only the URL of a web page, can we identify its language? This is the question that we examine in this paper. Such a language classifier is, for example, useful for crawlers of web search engines, which frequently try to satisfy certain language quotas. To determine the language of uncrawled web pages, they have to download the page, which might be wasteful, if the page is not in the desired language. With URL-based language classifiers these redundant downloads can be avoided. We apply a variety of machine learning algorithms to the language identification task and evaluate their performance in extensive experiments for five languages: English, French, German, Spanish and Italian. Our best methods achieve an F-measure, averaged over all languages, of around .90 for both a random sample of 1,260 web page from a large web crawl and for 25k pages from the ODP directory. For 5k pages of web search engine results we even achieve an F-measure of .96. The achieved recall for these collections is .93, .88 and .95 respectively. Two independent human evaluators performed considerably worse on the task, with an F-measure of .75 and a typical recall of a mere .67. Using only country-code top-level domains, such as .de or .fr yields a good precision, but a typical recall of below .60 and an F-measure of around .68.
Eda Baykan, Monika Henzinger, Ingmar Weber
Proc. VLDB Endow.1