Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wei Wei 0015

dblp:24/4105-15 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
model checking
0.212013
Integer Linear Programming-Based Property Checking for Asynchronous Reactive Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013
Program verification
property checking
0.212013
Integer Linear Programming-Based Property Checking for Asynchronous Reactive Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013
Automated reasoning and model checking
abstraction refinement
0.212013
Integer Linear Programming-Based Property Checking for Asynchronous Reactive Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013
Automated reasoning and model checking › abstraction refinement
counterexample-guided abstraction refinement
0.212013
Integer Linear Programming-Based Property Checking for Asynchronous Reactive Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

integer linear programming · 0.3counterexample-guided abstraction refinement · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Integer Linear Programming-Based Property Checking for Asynchronous Reactive Systems
abstract
Asynchronous reactive systems form the basis of a wide range of software systems, for instance in the telecommunications domain. It is highly desirable to rigorously show that these systems are correctly designed. However, traditional formal approaches to the verification of these systems are often difficult because asynchronous reactive systems usually possess extremely large or even infinite state spaces. We propose an integer linear program (ILP) solving-based property checking framework that concentrates on the local analysis of the cyclic behavior of each individual component of a system. We apply our framework to the checking of the buffer boundedness and livelock freedom properties, both of which are undecidable for asynchronous reactive systems with an infinite state space. We illustrate the application of the proposed checking methods to Promela, the input language of the SPIN model checker. While the precision of our framework remains an issue, we propose a counterexample guided abstraction refinement procedure based on the discovery of dependences among control flow cycles. We have implemented prototype tools with which we obtained promising experimental results on real-life system models.
Stefan Leue, Wei Wei 0015
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
2010 Formal Analysis of BPMN Models Using Event-B
Jeremy W. Bryans, Wei Wei 0015
FMICS2
2006 A Livelock Freedom Analysis for Infinite State Asynchronous Reactive Systems
Stefan Leue, Alin Stefanescu, Wei Wei 0015
CONCUR3
2006 A Region Graph Based Approach to Termination Proofs
Stefan Leue, Wei Wei 0015
TACAS2
2004 A Scalable Incomplete Test for the Boundedness of UML RT Models
Stefan Leue, Richard Mayr, Wei Wei 0015
TACAS3