Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sikandar Samar

dblp:24/4347 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.112006
Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
linear classification
0.112006
Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.012006
Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
pareto optimality
0.012006
Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel-based classification · 0.1gaussian class-conditional distributions · 0.1tradeoff analysis · 0.1trade-off analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Pareto optimal linear classification
abstract
We consider the problem of choosing a linear classifier that minimizes misclassification probabilities in two-class classification, which is a bi-criterion problem, involving a trade-off between two objectives. We assume that the class-conditional distributions are Gaussian. This assumption makes it computationally tractable to find Pareto optimal linear classifiers whose classification capabilities are inferior to no other linear ones. The main purpose of this paper is to establish several robustness properties of those classifiers with respect to variations and uncertainties in the distributions. We also extend the results to kernel-based classification. Finally, we show how to carry out trade-off analysis empirically with a finite number of given labeled data.
Seung-Jean Kim, Alessandro Magnani, Sikandar Samar, Stephen P. Boyd, Johan Lim
ICML3