Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sikandar Samar
dblp:24/4347
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
linear classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
pareto optimality |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Pareto optimal linear classification · ICML 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kernel-based classification · 0.1gaussian class-conditional distributions · 0.1tradeoff analysis · 0.1trade-off analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Pareto optimal linear classificationabstractWe consider the problem of choosing a linear classifier that minimizes misclassification probabilities in two-class classification, which is a bi-criterion problem, involving a trade-off between two objectives. We assume that the class-conditional distributions are Gaussian. This assumption makes it computationally tractable to find Pareto optimal linear classifiers whose classification capabilities are inferior to no other linear ones. The main purpose of this paper is to establish several robustness properties of those classifiers with respect to variations and uncertainties in the distributions. We also extend the results to kernel-based classification. Finally, we show how to carry out trade-off analysis empirically with a finite number of given labeled data. Seung-Jean Kim, Alessandro Magnani, Sikandar Samar, Stephen P. Boyd, Johan Lim |
ICML | 3 |